Skip to main content

The Role of Interval Initialization in a GBML System with Rule Representation and Adaptive Discrete Intervals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 551 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2504))

Abstract

This paper examines some initialization methods for a genetic based machine learning (GBML) rule representation [2] which works with adaptive discretization intervals. The methods studied apply different degrees of uniformness to the initial intervals of the population. The tests done show that except the test problems with more attributes, the differences between the tested methods accuracies are not significant. This proves that we only have to be aware of it in a limited kind of problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jesús Aguilar, José Riquelme, and Miguel Toro. Three geometric approaches for representing decision rules in a supervised learning system. In Late Breaking Papers of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO’99), pages 8–15, 19919999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jaume Bacardit and Josep M. Garrell. Evolution of adaptive discretization intervals for a rule-based genetic learning system. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2002) (to appear), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jaume Bacardit and Josep M. Garrell. Métodos de generalización para sistemas clasificadores de Pittsburgh. In Proceedings of the “Primer Congreso Iberoamericano de Algoritmos Evolutivos y Bioinspirados (AEB’02)”, pages 486–493, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Blake, E. Keogh, and C. Merz. Uci repository of machine learning databases, 1998. Blake, C., Keogh, E., & Merz, C.J. (1998). UCI repository of machine learning databases (http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html).

  5. O. Cordón, M. del Jesus, and F. Herrera. Genetic learning of fuzzy rule-based classification systems co-operating with fuzzy reasoning methods, 1998. Cordn, O., del Jesus, M.J and Herrera, F. (1998), Genetic learning of fuzzy rule-based classification systems co-operating with fuzzy reasoning methods, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 13 (10/11), pp.1025–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kenneth A. DeJong and William M. Spears. Learning concept classification rules using genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 651–656, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Usama M. Fayyad and Keki B. Irani. Multi-interval discretization of continuousvalued attributes for classification learning. In IJCAI, pages 1022–1029, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elisabet Golobardes, Xavier Llorá, Josep Maria Garrell, David Vernet, and Jaume Bacardit. Genetic classifier system as a heuristic weighting method for a case-based classifier system. Butlletί de l’Associació Catalana d’Intel.ligéncia Artificial, 22:132–141, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John H. Holland. Escaping Brittleness: The possibilities of General-Purpose Learning Algorithms Applied to Parallel Rule-Based Systems. In Mitchell, Michalski, and Carbonell, editors, Machine learning, an artificial intelligence approach. Volume II, pages 593–623. Morgan Kaufmann, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ron Kohavi. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In IJCAI, pages 1137–1145, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander V. Kozlov and Daphne Koller. Nonuniform dynamic discretization in hybrid networks. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in AI (UAI), pages 314–325, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Liu and R. Setiono. Chi2: Feature selection and discretization of numeric attributes. In Proceedings of 7th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 388–391. IEEE Computer Society, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xavier Llorá and Josep M. Garrell. Knowledge-independent data mining with fine-grained parallel evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), pages 461–468. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Martί, X. Cufί, J. Regincós, and et al. Shape-based feature selection for microcalcification evaluation. In Imaging Conference on Image Processing, 3338:1215–1224, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Martίnez Marroquίn, C. Vos, and et al. Morphological analysis of mammary biopsy images. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’96), pages 943–947, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ronald L. Rivest. Learning decision lists. Machine Learning, 2(3):229–246, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stephen F. Smith. Flexible learning of problem solving heuristics through adaptive search. In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83), pages 421–425, Los Altos, CA, 1983. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Terence Soule and James A. Foster. Effects of code growth and parsimony pressure on populations in genetic programming. Evolutionary Computation, 6(4):293–309, Winter 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart W. Wilson. Get real! XCS with continuous-valued inputs. In L. Booker, Stephanie Forrest, M. Mitchell, and Rick L. Riolo, editors, Festschrift in Honor of John H. Holland, pages 111–121. Center for the Study of Complex Systems, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bacardit, J., Maria Garrell, J. (2002). The Role of Interval Initialization in a GBML System with Rule Representation and Adaptive Discrete Intervals. In: Escrig, M.T., Toledo, F., Golobardes, E. (eds) Topics in Artificial Intelligence. CCIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2504. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36079-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36079-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00011-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36079-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics