Advertisement

Quality Assurance in Radiation Oncology

  • James A. Purdy
  • Eric Klein
  • Srinivasan Vijayakumar
  • Carlos A. Perez
  • Seymour H. Levitt
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Keywords

Radiation Oncology Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Monitor Unit Electronic Portal Imaging Device Gantry Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AAPM (1983) Task Group 21, Radiation Therapy Committee, American Association of Physicists in Medicine: A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys 10:741–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AAPM (1990) Report number 36: essentials and guidelines for hospital-based medical physics residency training programsGoogle Scholar
  3. AAPM (2005) Report 87: diode in vivo dosimetry for patients receiving external beam radiation therapy: report of Task Group 62 of the Radiation Therapy CommitteeGoogle Scholar
  4. Abt Associates (1995) Abt study of medical physicist work effort. Prepared for the American College of Medical Physics and American Association of Physicists in Medicine by Abt Associates Inc., 1110 Vermont Avenue NW, Suite 610, Washington DC, 20005Google Scholar
  5. Abt Associates (2003) Abt study of medical physicist work values for radiation oncology physics services: round II(final report). Prepared for American College of Medical Physics and American Association of Physicists in Medicine by Abt Associates Inc., 1110 Vermont Avenue NW, Suite 610, Washington DC, 20005Google Scholar
  6. ACR (2004) American College of Radiology: practice guidelines and technical standards. American College of Radiology, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R, Rogers DWO (1999) AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys 26:1847–1870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyer A, Ochran TG, Nyerick CE, Waldron TJ, Huntzinger CJ (1992) Clinical dosimetry for implementation of a multileaf collimator. Med Phys 19:1255–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyer A, Biggs P, Galvin J, Klein E, LoSasso T, Low D, Mah K, Yu C (2001) AAPM report 72: basic applications of multileaf collimators, report of Task Group 50. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  10. Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, Palta JR, Rosen I, Sharpe MB, Xia P, Xiao Y, Xing L, Yu CX (2003) Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys 30:2089–2115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, Kutcher G, Starkschall G, Stern R, van Dyk J (1998) AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys 25:1773–1829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galvin JM, Ezzell G, Eisbrauch A, Yu C, Butler B, Xiao Y, Rosen I, Rosenman J, Sharpe M, Xing L, Xia P, Lomax T, Low DA, Palta J (2004) Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: a joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1616–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herman MG, Balter JM, Jaffray DA, McGee KP, Munro P, Shalev S, van Herk M, Wong JW (2001) Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. Med Phys 28:712–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herman MG, Mills MD, Gillin MT (2003) Reimbursement versus effort in medical physics practice in radiation oncology. J Appl Clin Med Phys 4:179–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herman MG, Klein EE, Mills MD, Boyer A (2005) Estimating medical physicist FTE using the 2003 Abt Survey and procedure volumes in radiation therapy (Abstract). Med Phys 32:2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herring DF, Compton DMJ (1971) The degree of precision required in radiation dose delivered in cancer radiotherapy. In: Glicksman AJ, Cohen M, Cunningham JR (eds) Computers in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol Special Report Series No. 5Google Scholar
  17. Holmes T, McCullough EC (1983) Acceptance testing and quality assurance of automated scanning film densitometers used in dosimetry of electron and photon therapy beams. Med Phys 10:698–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. HPA (1970) Hospital Physics Association Report: a suggested procedure for the mechanical alignment of telegamma and megavoltage X-ray beam unitsGoogle Scholar
  19. ICRU (1976) Report no. 24: Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of X or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  20. ICRU (1993) Report no. 50: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  21. IMRTCWG (2001) NCI IMRT Collaborative Working Group: intensity modulated radiation therapy: current status and issues of interest. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:880–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ISCRO (1991) Radiation oncology in integrated cancer management: report of the Inter-Society Council for Radiation Oncology. Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacky J, White CP (1990) Testing a 3-D radiation therapy planning program. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:253–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Joyce E (1986) “Malfunction 54”: unraveling deadly medical mystery of computerized accelerator gone awry. Am Med NewsGoogle Scholar
  25. Karzmark CJ (1987) Procedural and operator error aspects of radiation accidents in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:1599–1602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein EE, Low DA (2001) Interleaf leakage for 5-and 10-mm dynamic multileaf collimiation systems incorporating patient motion. Med Phys 28:1703–1710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein EE, Taylor M, Michaletz-Lorenz M, Zoeller D, Umfleet W (1994) A mono-isocentric technique for breast and regional nodal therapy using dual asymmetric jaws. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 28:753–760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein EE, Harms WB, Low DA, Willcut V, Purdy JA (1995) Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: dosimetry, networking, simulation, and quality assurance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33:1195–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein EE, Low DA, Maag D, Purdy JA (1996) A quality assurance program for ancillary high technology devices on a dual-energy accelerator. Radiother Oncol 38:51–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klein EE, Gerber RG, Zhu XR, Oehmke F, Purdy JA (1998) Mutliple machine implementation of enhanced dynamic wedge. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol PhysGoogle Scholar
  31. Klein EE, Drzymala RE, Purdy JA, Michalski J (2005) Errors in radiation oncology: a study in pathways and dosimetric impact. J Appl Clin Med Phys 6:81–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, Hanson WF, Leibel S, Morton RJ, Palta JR, Purdy JA, Reinstein LE, Svensson GK, Weller M, Wingfield L (1994) Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys 21:581–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leavitt DD, Martin M, Moeller JH, Lee WL (1990) Dynamic wedge field techniques through computer-controlled collimator motion and dose delivery. Med Phys 17:87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leunens G, van Dam J, Dutreix A, van der Schueren A (1990) Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in vivo dosimetry. I. Entrance dose measurements, a reliable procedure. Radiother Oncol 17:141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Low DA, Klein EE, Maag DK, Umfleet WE, Purdy JA (1996) Commissioning and periodic quality assurance of a clinical electronic portal imaging device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 34:117–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCullough EC, Holmes TW (1985) Acceptance testing computerized radiation therapy treatment planning systems: direct utilization of CT scan data. Med Phys 12:237–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mellenberg DE, Dahl RA, Blackwell CR (1990) Acceptance testing of an automated scanning water phantom. Med Phys 17:311–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mutic S, Low DA (1998) Whole-body dose from tomotherapy delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:229–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mutic S, Palta JR, Butker EK, Das IJ, Huq MS, Loo L-H D, Salter BJ, McCollough CH, van Dyk J (2003) Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group no 68. Med Phys 30:2762–2792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nath R, Biggs PJ, Bova FJ, Ling CC, Purdy JA, van de Geijn J, Weinhous MS (1994) AAPM code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Task Group no 45. Med Phys 21:1093–1121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. NRC (2003) Nuclear Regulatory Commission 10 CFR part 35, medical use of byproduct materialGoogle Scholar
  42. Palta JR, Ayyangar KM, Suntharalingam N (1988) Dosimetric characteristics of a 6-mV photon beam from a linear accelerator with asymmetric collimator jaws. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14:383–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Parrino PA, Purdy JA (1983) The role of maintenance in quality assurance. In: Starkschall G (ed) Proc Symposium on Quality Assurance of Radiotherapy Equipment. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp 157–168Google Scholar
  44. Patton GA, Gaffney DK, Moeller JH (2003) Facilitation of radiotherapeutic error by computerized record and verify systems. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:50–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Purdy JA (1983) Quality assurance of electron linear accelerators. In: Starkschall G (ed) Proc Symposium on Quality Assurance of Radiotherapy Equipment. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp 86–106Google Scholar
  46. Purdy JA (1991a) Organization of a quality assurance program: a large radiotherapy facility with affiliated clinics. In: Starkschall G, Horton J (eds) Quality assurance in radiotherapy physics. Proc American College of Medical Physics Symposium. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 299–317Google Scholar
  47. Purdy JA (1991b) QA of external beam megavoltage radiotherapy equipment. In: Starkschall G, Horton J (eds) Quality assurance in radiotherapy physics. Proc American College of Medical Physics Symposium. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 23–43Google Scholar
  48. Purdy JA, Harms WB, Gerber RG (1986) Report on a long-term quality assurance program. In: Kereiakes JG, Elson HR, Born CG (eds) Radiation oncology physics 1986. American Institute of Physics, New York, NY, pp 91–109Google Scholar
  49. Purdy JA, Biggs PJ, Bowers C, Dally E, Downs W, Fraass BA, Karzmark CJ, Khan F, Morgan P, Morton R, Palta J, Rosen II, Thorson T, Svensson G, Ting J (1993) Medical accelerator safety considerations: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group no 35. Med Phys 20:1261–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Purdy JA, Klein EE, Low DA (1995) Quality assurance and safety of new technologies for radiation oncology. Semin Radiat Oncol 5:156–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Purdy JA, Grant W, Palta JR, Butler EB, Perez CA (2001) 3-D conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy: physics and clinical applications. Advanced Medical Publishing, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosen II, Purdy JA (1992) Computer controlled medical accelerators. In: Purdy JA (ed) Advances in radiation oncology physics: dosimetry, treatment planning, and brachytherapy. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  53. Slessinger ED, Gerber RG, Harms WB, Klein EE, Purdy JA (1993) Independent collimator dosimetry for a dual photon energy linear accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27:681–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Dyk J, Purdy JA (1999) Clinical implementation of technology and the quality assurance process. In: Dyk JV (ed) The modern technology of radiation oncology: a compendium for medical physicists and radiation oncologists. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 19–51Google Scholar
  55. Van Dyk J, Barrett RB, Cygler JE, Shraggo PC (1993) Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26:261–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Weinhous MS, Purdy JA, Granda CO (1990) Testing of a medical linear accelerator’s computer-control system. Med Phys 17:95–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. World Health Organization (1988) Quality assurance in radiotherapy. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  58. Williamson JF, Khan FM, Sharma SC (1981) Film dosimetry of megavoltage photon beams: a practical method of isodensity-to-isodose curve conversion. Med Phys 8:94–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Purdy
    • 1
  • Eric Klein
    • 2
  • Srinivasan Vijayakumar
    • 1
  • Carlos A. Perez
    • 2
  • Seymour H. Levitt
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of California Davis Medical CenterSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiation Oncology, Mallinckrodt Institute of RadiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Therapeutic Radiation OncologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations