Skip to main content

Apportionment: Uni- and Bi-Dimensional

  • Conference paper
Book cover Mathematics and Democracy

Part of the book series: Studies in Choice and Welfare ((WELFARE))

Abstract

This paper characterizes divisor methods for vector and matrix apportion problems with very simple properties. For the vector problem—a vector gives the votes of parties or the populations of states, a single number the size of the house—they are shown to be the only methods that are coherent with the definition of the corresponding divisor method when applied to only two states or parties. For the matrix problem—rows correspond to districts, columns to parties, entries to votes for party-lists, and the number of seats due to each row (or district) and each column (or party) is known—one extra property is necessary. The method must be proportional: it must give identical answers to a problem obtained by re-scaling any rows and/or any columns of the matrix of votes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • M. Balinski (2004), Le suffrage universel inachevé, Éditions Belin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski (2002), “Une ‘dose’ de proportionnelle: le système électorale mexicain,” Pour la science, 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski (2005), What is just? American Mathematical Monthly, 112, 502–511.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski and G. Demange (1989a), An axiomatic approach to proportionality between matrices, Mathematics of Operations Research 14, 700–719.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski and G. Demange (1989b), Algorithms for proportional matrices in reals and integers, Mathematical Programming 45, 193–210.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski and S. Rachev (1997), Rounding proportions: methods of rounding, The Mathematical Scientist 22, 1–26.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski and V. Ramírez (1997), Mexican electoral law: 1996 version, Electoral Studies 16, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski and V. Ramírez (1999a), Mexico’s 1997 apportionment defies its electoral law, Electoral Studies 18, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Balinski and V. Ramírez (1999b), Parametric methods of apportionment, rounding and production, Mathematical Social Sciences 37, 107–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M.L. Balinski and H.P. Young (1982), Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote, Yale University Press, New Haven; 2nd ed., Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Pukelsheim and C. Schuhmacher (2004), Das neue Zürcher Zuteilungsverfahren für Parlamentswahlen, Aktuelle Juristichische Praxis 5, 505–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Zachariassen and Martin Zachariassen (2005), A comparison of electoral formulae for the Faroese Palriament (The Løgting), Technical report, NáttúruvÍsindadeildin, Føroya, 1 August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Balinski, M. (2006). Apportionment: Uni- and Bi-Dimensional. In: Simeone, B., Pukelsheim, F. (eds) Mathematics and Democracy. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35605-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics