Skip to main content

Characterizing Land Cover Structure with Semantic Variograms

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper introduces the semantic variogram, which is a measure of spatial variation based upon semantic similarity metrics calculated for nominal land cover class definitions. Traditional approaches for measuring spatial autocorrelation for nominal geographical data compare classes between pairs of observations to determine a simple binary measure of similarity (identical/different). These binary values are summarized over many sample pairs separated by various distances to characterize some spatial metric of correlation, or variation. The use of binary similarity measures ignores potentially substantial ranges in similarity between different classes. Through the development of category representations capable of producing quantifiable measures of pair wise class similarity, descriptive spatial statistics that operate upon ratio data may be employed. These measures, including the semantic variogram proposed in this work, may characterize spatial variability of categorical maps more sensitively than traditional measures. We apply the semantic variogram to National Land Cover Data (NLCD) for three different study sites, and compare results to those from a multiple class indicator semivariogram. We demonstrate that substantial differences exist in observed short-range variability for the two metrics in all sites. The semantic variograms detect much lower short-range variability due to the tendency of semantically similar classes to be closer together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlqvist O (2004) A parameterized representation of uncertain conceptual spaces. Transactions in GIS 8(4):493–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault G, Marcotte D (1991) Multivariable variogram and its application to the linear model of coregionalization. Mathematical Geology 23(7):899–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, King AW, Mann LK, Washington-Allen RA, McCord RA (1998) Assessing Land-Use Impacts on Natural Resources. Environmental Management 22(2):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFrie RS, Field CB, Fung I, Justice CO, Los S, Matson PA, Matthews E, Mooney HA, Potter CS, Prentice K, Sellers PJ, Townshend JRG, Tucker CJ, Ustin SL, Vitousek PM (1995) Mapping the land surface for global atmosphere-biosphere models: toward continuous distributions of vegetation’s functional properties. J of Geophysical Research: Atmosphere 100:20867–20882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio A, Jansen LJM (1998) Land Cover Classification System: Classification Concepts And User Manual. FAO, Rome, 179 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman A, Gupta MM (1985) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 351 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E, Turner B, Geist H, Agbola S, Angelsen A, Bruce J, Coomes O, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George P, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Lin X, Moran E, Mortimorep M, Ramakrishnan P, Richards J, Skanes H, Steffen W, Stone G, Svedin U, Veldkamp T, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes C, Augé JI (eds) (1999) Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC): implementation strategy. IGBP report(48), IHDP report (10). International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, Stockholm, 125 p

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan DO, Unwin DJ (2004) Geographic Information Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. URL: http://www.R-project.org/. R Foundation, Vienna, Austria. Accessed 12/1/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • USGSa (2005) National Land Cover Dataset 1992. http://landcover.usgs.gov/natllandcover.asp. United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Accessed 12/1/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • USGSb (2005) Seamless Data Distribution System. http://seamless.usgs.gov/ United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Accessed 12/1/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Hall CAS, Cornell JD (2002) Spatial dependence and the relationship of soil organic carbon and soil moisture in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Landscape Ecology 17(8):671–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Webster CJ (1998) Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B 25:103–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Norvell WA, Hopkins DG, Welch RM (2002) Spatial variability of grain cadmium and soil characteristics in a durum wheat field. Soil Science Society of America J 66:268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Stehman SV, Smith JH, Wickham JD (2001) Thematic sccuracy of MRLC land cover for the eastern United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 76:418–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahlqvist, O., Shortridge, A. (2006). Characterizing Land Cover Structure with Semantic Variograms. In: Riedl, A., Kainz, W., Elmes, G.A. (eds) Progress in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35589-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics