Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 703))

Abstract

The Metropolis (Markov Chain) Monte Carlo method is simple and powerful. Since 1953, many extensions of the original Markov Chain Monte Carlo method have been proposed, but they are all based on the original Metropolis prescription that only states belonging to the Markov Chain should be sampled. In particular, if trial moves to a potential target state are rejected, that state is not included in the sampling. I will argue that the efficiency of effectively all Markov Chain MC schemes can be improved by including the rejected states in the sampling procedure. Such an approach requires only a trivial (and cheap) extension of existing programs. I will demonstrate that the approach leads to improved estimates of the energy of a system and that it leads to better estimates of free-energy landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. Metropolis et al. (1953) Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J. Chem. Phys., 21, p. 1087

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Ulam and N. Metropolis (1949) The Monte Carlo Method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 44, p. 335

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. V. I. Manousiouthakis and M. W. Deem (1999) Strict detailed balance is unnecessary in Monte Carlo simulation. J. Chem. Phys., 110, p. 2753

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Barker (1965) Monte Carlo calculations of the radial distribution functions for a proton-electron plasma. Aust. J. Phys., 18, p. 119

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Understanding Molecular Simulations: from Algorithms to Applications (2nd Edition). (Academic Press, San Diego, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. H. Swendsen and J. S. Wang (1987) Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, p. 86

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Frenkel (2004) Speed-up of Monte Carlo simulations by sampling of rejected states. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 101, p. 17571

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. I. Coluzza and D. Frenkel (2005) Virtual-move parallel tempering. Chem. Phys. Chem., 6(9), p. 1779

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Boulougouris and D. Frenkel (2005) Monte Carlo sampling of a Markov web. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 1, p. 389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frenkel, D. (2006). Waste-Recycling Monte Carlo. In: Ferrario, M., Ciccotti, G., Binder, K. (eds) Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter Systems: From Materials to Chemical Biology Volume 1. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 703. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35273-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics