Advertisement

Developing the Climate Change Regime: The Role of Verification

  • Larry MacFaul

Keywords

World Trade Organization Kyoto Protocol Commitment Period Trade Measure Tackle Climate Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    UNFCCC (2003a): Counting emissions and removals: greenhouse gas inventories under the UNFCCC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wiser, G., and D. Goldberg (2000): Restoring the Balance: Using Remedial Measures to Avoid and Cure Non-Compliance under the Kyoto Protocol. Report prepared for the World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grubb, M. (2004) Kyoto and the Future of International Climate Change Responses: From Here to Where? In: International Review for Environmental Strategies (2004), Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 15–38, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corfee Morlot, J. (1998): Ensuring compliance with a global climate change agreement, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Information Paper, ENV/EPOC(98)5/REV1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crossen, T. (2003): Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Compliance Continuum, Berkley Electronic Press, www.law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/36.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chayes, A. and A. Chayes (1995): The New Sovereignty: Compliance with international regulatory agreements, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raustiala, K. and D.G. Victor (1998): Conclusions. In: Victor, D.G., Raustiala, K. and E.B. Skolnikoff (eds) (1998): The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Downs, G., Rocke, D. and P. Barsoom (1996): Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization 50.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Victor, D. (1999): Enforcing international law: implications for an effective global warming regime. Duke Environmental Law and Policy 10.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, X and G. Wiser (2002): The Implementation and Compliance Regimes under the Climate Change Convention and its Kyoto Protocol. RECIEL 11(2) 2002. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK and Malden, USA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Earth Negotiations Bulletin (2001a), Chasek, P. (ed.): Summary of the resumed sixth session of the conference of parties to the UNFCCC: 16–27 July 2001. International Institute of Sustainable Development (IISD), Vol.12, No.176.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Earth Negotiations Bulletin (2001b), Chasek, P. (ed.): Summary of the seventh conference of parties to the UNFCCC: 29 October–10 November 2001, IISD, Vol.12, No.189.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wettestad, J. (2005), Enhancing Climate Compliance-What are the Lessons to Learn from Environmental Regimes and the EU? In: Stokke, O., Hovi, J. and G. Ulfstein (eds.) (2005): Implementing the climate change regime: International Compliance. Earthscan, London, pp.209–231.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hagem, C., Kallbekken, S., Maestad, O. and H. Westskog (2003): Tough justice for small nations: How strategic behaviour can influence the enforcement of the Kyoto Protocol, Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo (CICERO) Working Paper, 2003:01.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagem, C. and H. Westskog (2005): Effective Enforcement and Double-edged Deterrents: How the Impacts of Sanctions also Affect Complying Parties. In: Stokke, O., Hovi, J. and G. Ulfstein (eds.) (2005): Implementing the climate change regime: International Compliance. Earthscan, London, pp. 107–120.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berntsen, T., Fuglestvedt, J. and F. Stordal (2005): Reporting and Verification of Emissions and Removals of Greenhouse Gases. In: Stokke, O., Hovi, J. and G. Ulfstein (eds.) (2005): Implementing the climate change regime: International Compliance. Earthscan, London, pp. 85–105.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barrett, S. (2003): Environment and Statecraft. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C. and D. Brack (1999): The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment, Royal Institute of International Affairs and Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    OECD (2000): Trade Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements. OECD Industry, Services & Trade, 2000, Vol. 1999, No. 26.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stokke, O. (2005): Trade Measures, WTO and Climate Compliance. In: Stokke, O., Hovi, J. and G. Ulfstein (eds.) (2005): Implementing the climate change regime: International Compliance. Earthscan, London, pp. 147–165.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hovi, J. (2005): The Pros and Cons of External Enforcement. In: Stokke, O., Hovi, J and G. Ulfstein (eds.) (2005): Implementing the climate change regime: International Compliance. Earthscan, London, pp.129–145.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    News Release from MEP Caroline Lucas, 9 March 2004, www.carolinelucasmep.org.uk.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (2005): Amendments 1–20, Draft motion for a resolution. The Seminar of Governmental Experts on Climate Change, PE 375.672v01-00, (PE 357.580v01-00).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    European Parliament (2005): Resolution on the Seminar of Governmental Experts on Climate Change, P6T A — PROV (2005)0177, PE 357.354.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    UNFCCC (2004a): Issues relating to greenhouse gas inventories, FCCC/SBSTA/2004/L.17.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    UNFCCC (2004b): Reports of the individual review of greenhouse gas inventories 2004 (Annex I parties) (see www.unfccc.int).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    UNFCCC (2002): Fourth compilation and synthesis of initial national communications from Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention, FCCC/SBI/2002/8 & FCCC/SBI/2002/16.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    UNFCCC (2003b): Fifth compilation and synthesis of national communications from Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention, FCCC/SBI/2003/13.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Herold, A. (2003): Current Status of National Inventory Preparation in Annex I Parties and Non-Annex I Parties, OECD/International Energy Agency (IEA), COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2003)7.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rypdal, K., Stordal, F., Fuglestvedt, Jan S. and T. Berntsen (2003): Assessing compliance with the Kyoto Protocol: Expert reviews, inverse modelling, or both? CICERO Working Paper, 2003:07.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aschbacher, J. (2002): Monitoring environmental treaties using earth observation. In: Verification Yearbook 2002, Verification Research, Training and Information Centre (VERTIC), 2002, London.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosenqvist, A., Imhoff, M., Milne, A. and C. Dobson (eds.) (1999): Remote sensing and the Kyoto Protocol: A Review of Available and Future Technology for Monitoring Treaty Compliance. Workshop Report. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), WG VII/5 and VII/6.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Torvanger, A., Twena, M. and J. Vevatne (2004): Climate policy beyond 2012: A survey of long-term targets and future frameworks. CICERO Report 2004:02.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    EC Communication (2005): Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Winning the Battle Against Global Climate Change. SEC(2005) 180. Brussels, 9.2.2005 COM (2005) 35 Final.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    European Council (2005): Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, 23 March 2005, 7619/1/05 REV 1.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Philibert, C. and J. Pershing (2002): Beyond Kyoto: Energy Dynamics and Climate Stabilisation. OECD/IEA, 2002, IEA Publications, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aldy, J., Ashton, J., Baron, R., Bodansky, D., Charnovich, S., Diringer, E., Heller, T., Pershing, J., Shukla, P., Tubiana, L., Tudela, F. and X. Wang (2003): Beyond Kyoto-Advancing the international effort against climate change. Pew Centre on Global Climate Change, Arlington, USA.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Philibert, C., Pershing, J., Corfee Morlot, J. and S. Willems (2003): Evolution of Mitigation Commitments: Some Key Issues. OECD and IEA Information Paper.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dudek, D. and A. Golub (2003): “Intensity” targets: pathway or roadblock to preventing climate change while enhancing economic growth? Climate Policy, Vol.3(S2), 2003, S21–S28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim, Y. and K. Baumert (2002): Reducing uncertainty through dual intensity targets. In: K. Baumert (ed.) (2002): Building on the Kyoto Protocol, Options for protecting the climate, World Resources Institute, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Philibert, C. (2004): Lessons from the Kyoto Protocol: Implications for the Future. In: International Review for Environmental Strategies (2004), Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 311–322, IGES, Japan.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Höhne, N., Galleguillos, C., Blok, K., Harnisch, J. and D. Phylipsen (2003): Evolution of commitments under the UNFCCC: Involving newly industrialized countries and developing countries. ECOFYS GmbH on behalf of the Federal Environment Agency, Research Report 201 41 255 UBA-FB 000412, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Höhne, N., Phylipsen, S. Ullrich, S., and K. Blok (2005): Options for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, Climate Change 02/05, prepared by Ecofys for the German Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Blok, K., Höhne, N., Torvanger, A., and R. Janzic (2005): Towards a Post-2012 Climate Change Regime. Contracted by DG Environment, Directorate C-Air Quality, Climate Change, Chemicals and Biotechnology.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ott, H., Winkler, H., Brouns, B., Kartha, S., Mace, M. J., Huq, S., Kameyama, Y., Sari, A., Pan, J., Sokona, Y., Bhandari, P., Kassenburg, A., Lbre La Rovere, E. and A. Atiq Rahman (2004): South-North Dialogue on Equity in the Greenhouse. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Groenenberg, H., Blok, K. and J. van der Sluijs (2004): Global Triptych: a bottom-up approach for the differentiation of commitments under the Climate Convention. Climate Policy, Vol. 4, Number 2, (2004), pp.153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Global Commons Institute website (2005): www.gci.org.uk.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin · Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry MacFaul
    • 1
  1. 1.The Verification ResearchTraining and Information Centre (VERTIC)LondonUK

Personalised recommendations