Skip to main content

Advanced Sensor Technologies

  • Conference paper
Verifying Treaty Compliance
  • 791 Accesses

5 Conclusion

Many technologies are already available that could improve verification. Others are on the horizon, in particular using advances in microsystems- and nanotechnology. Intensified and widened research would help, even though not all projects will lead to practicable verification means or methods.

Even though the availability of means and methods for adequate verification is a necessary prerequisite for agreements that limit military capabilities in the interest of peace and international security, ultimately, the decision to enter such agreements is a political one. A task of major importance is thus to improve the conditions for such decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, J. (1992): On-Site Verification Technologies-An Overview. In: Altmann, J., H. van der Graaf, P. Lewis and P. Markl (eds.) (1992), Verification at Vienna-Monitoring Reductions of Conventional Armed Forces, Gordon & Breach, New York etc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. START 1 (1991): Protocol on Inspections and Continuous Monitoring Activities, Annexes 8, 9; Protocol on Telemetric Information. In: START-Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms. U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zwilling, M. (2006): Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunay, P. M. Krasznai, H. Spitzer, R. Wiemker and W. Wynne, (2004): Open Skies-A Cooperative Approach to Military Transparency and Confidence Building. UN Institute for Disarmament Research/UNO, Geneva/New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson, J. (2006): Experience and challenges in WMD treaty verification: a comparative view. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kalinowski, M. B. (2006) Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty CTBT Verification. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boese, W. and J.P. Scoblic (2002): The Jury Is Still Out. Arms Control Today, Vol. 32(5), pp. 4–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nixdorff, K. (2006): Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Altmann, J. (2001): Military Uses of Microsystem Technologies — Dangers and Preventive Arms Control. Agenda, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  10. Altmann, J. (2006): Military Nanotechnology: Potential Applications and Preventive Arms Control. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blumrich, R. (1998): Technical Potential, Status and Costs of Ground Sensor Systems. In: Altmann, J., H. Fischer and H. van der Graaf (eds.) (1998): Sensors for Peace — Applications, Systems and Legal Requirements for Monitoring in Peace Operations. UN Institute for Disarmament Research/UNO, Geneva/New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Altmann, J. (2004): Acoustic and Seismic Signals of Heavy Military Vehicles for Co-operative Verification, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 273(4–5), pp. 713–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Altmann, J., S. Linev and A. Weiß (2002): Acoustic-Seismic Detection and Classification of Military Vehicles — Developing Tools for Disarmament and Peacekeeping. Applied Acoustics, Vol. 63(10), pp. 1085–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blumrich, R., (1998a): Sound Propagation and Seismic Signals of Aircraft Used for Airport Monitoring — Investigations for Peace-Keeping and Verification. Verification — Research Reports, no. 10. ISL, Hagen

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blumrich, R. and J. Altmann (1999): Aircraft Sound Propagation Near to the Ground: Measurements and Calculations. ACUSTICA — acta acustica, Vol. 85(4), pp. 495–504

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blumrich, R. and J. Altmann (2000): Medium-range localisation of aircraft via triangulation. Applied Acoustics, Vol. 61(1), pp. 65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Altmann, J. (2005): Acoustic-Seismic Detection of Ballistic-Missile Launches for Cooperative Early Warning of Nuclear Attack. Science and Global Security, Vol. 13(3), pp. 129–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nixdorff K., M. Hotz, D. Schilling and M. Dando (2003): Biotechnology and the Biological Weapon Convention. agenda, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacFaul, L. (2006): Developing the climate change regime: the role of verification. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Altmann, J. (2006). Advanced Sensor Technologies. In: Avenhaus, R., Kyriakopoulos, N., Richard, M., Stein, G. (eds) Verifying Treaty Compliance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33854-3_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics