Advertisement

Environmental Sample Analysis

  • Martin B. Kalinowski
  • Johann Feichter
  • Mika Nikkinen
  • Clemens Schlosser

6 Conclusions

Environmental sample analysis is not a new verification method. It has been applied ever since the first nuclear weapons were produced and tested and related national technical means played a major role in verifying compliance with the Partial Test Bean Treaty of 1963. However, scientific progresses in measurement technologies and source location methods as well as major verification applications for nuclear arms control (UNSCOM/UNMOVIC since 1990 and CTBT since 1996) in recent years have brought significant progress. New opportunities are being explored with regard to wide-area environmental sampling according to the NPT Additional Protocol (model agreement of 1997). Further proposals include the to-be-negotiated Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty (Shannon Mandate of 1995) as well as bilateral or regional agreements on cooperative environmental monitoring as confidence building measures.

Keywords

Nuclear Weapon Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometry Cloud Droplet Nuclear Explosion International Monitoring System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sittkus A. und H. Stockburger (1976): Krypton-85 als Indikator des Kernbrennstoffverbrauchs. Naturwissenschaften 63, 266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hippel, F. von, D.H. Albright and B.G. Levi (1986): Quantities of Fissile Materials in US and Soviet Nuclear Weapons Arsenals. Centre for Energy and Environmental Studies. The Engineering Quadrangle, Princeton University, PU/CEES Report No.168.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donohue, D.L. and R. Zeisler (1992): Behind the Scenes: Scientific Analysis of Samples from Nuclear Inspections in Iraq. IAEA Bulletin 34(1).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baute, J. (2006): The Iraq Case. This volume.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    INFCIRC/540 (1997): Model Protocol Additional to the Agreement(s) Between States and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards. INFCIRC-540 corr., Vienna, September 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooley, J. (2006): The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty NPT. This volume.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nicholson, K.W. (2004): Technical Solutions and Directions — Wide Area Monitoring. ESARDA 4th Workshop on Safeguards Perspectives for a Future Nuclear Environment. Cernabbio, Italy, 14–16 October 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalinowski, M.B., H. Sartorius, S. Uhl and W. Weiss (2004): Conclusions on Plutonium Separation from Atmospheric Krypton-85 Measured at Various Distances from the Karlsruhe Reprocessing Plant. J. Environ. Radioactivity 73/2 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalinowski, M.B. (2006): Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty CTBT verification. This volume.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bowyer T.W. (1998): Xenon Radionuclides, Atmospheric Monitoring, in. Encyclopedia of Environmental Analysis and Remediation, Editor Robert A. Meyers, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-11708-0Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foggi, C. and F. Genoni (eds.) (1997): Status of Measurement Techniques for the Identification of Nuclear Signatures, Proceeding of Workshop held in Geel, Belgium, 25–27 February 1997, EUR 17312 EN.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donohue, D.L. (2002): Key tools for nuclear inspections. Advances in environmental sampling strengthen safeguards. IAEA Bulletin 44(2), 17–23.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IAEA (2003): International Conference on Advances in Destructive and Nondestructive Analysis for Environmental Monitoring and Nuclear Forensics, 21.–23.10.2002, Karlsruhe, Germany, IAEA-CN-98/5/08P, IAEA.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch, L. (2003): Traces of Evidence: Nuclear Forensics and Illicit Trafficking. IAEA Bulletin, 45(1) 21–23.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayer, K. (2006): Nuclear Forensics. This volume.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller K.M. and R.J. Larson (2002): The Development of Field-Based Measurement Methods for Radioactive Fallout Assessment, Health Physics 82/5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winger, K., J. Feichter, M.B. Kalinowski, H. Sartorius, C. Schlosser (2005): A new compilation of the atmospheric krypton-85 inventories from 1945 to 2000 and its evaluation in a global transport model. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 80, 183–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stocki, T.J., X. Blanchard, R. D’Amours, R.K. Ungar, J.P. Fontaine, M-Sohier, M. Bean, T. Taffary, J. Racine, B.L. Tracy, G. Brachet, M. Jean, D. Meyerhof (2005): Automated radioxenon monitoring for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty in two distinctive locations: Ottawa and Tahiti. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 80, 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Auer M., A. Axelsson, X. Blanchard, T.W. Bowyer, G. Brachet, I. Bulowski, Y. Dubasov, K. Elmgren, J.P. Fontaine, W. Harms, J.C. Hayes, T.R. Heimbigner, J.I. McIntyre, M.E. Panisko, Y. Popov, A. Ringbom, H. Sartorius, S. Schmid, J. Schulze, C. Schlosser, T. Taffary, W. Weiss and B. Wernsperger (2004): Intercomparison experiments of systems for the measurement of xenon radionuclides in the atmosphere, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 60, 863–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kalinowski, M.B. (2001): Atmospheric transport modelling related to radionuclide monitoring in support of Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty verifi-cation. Kerntechnik 66/3 129–133.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feichter J, Schultz M, Diehl T (2002): Modelling chemical constituents of the atmosphere, Computing in Science & Engineering (5): 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilby, R.L. and T.M.L. Wigley (1997): Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Progress in Physical Geography, 21, 530–548.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giorgi, F., B. Hewitson, J. Christensen, C. Fu, M. Hulme, L. Mearns, H. von Storch, P. Whetton, and contributing authors (2001): Regional Climate Simulation. Evaluation and projections. In IPCC WG1 Third Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    World Meteorological Organization, Global Atmosphere Watch (2004): 1st International Expert Meeting on Sources and Measurements of Natural Radionuclides Applied to Climate and Air Quality Studies, Gif sur Yvette, France, 3–5 June 2003.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reiter, ER (1978): Atmospheric Transport Processes, Part 4: Radioactive Tracers, DOE Critical Review Series, Virginia, U.S.A, pp 605.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heimann, M., P. Monfray, G. Polian (1998): Long-range transport of Rn-222-a test for 3d tracer models, Chemical Geology 70(1–2): 98–98.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weiss W., H. Sartorius, H. Stockburger (1992): Global Distribution of Atmospheric 85Kr, In Isotopes of Noble Gases as Tracers in Environmental Studies, Proceedings of a Consultants Meeting, Vienna, 29 May–2 June 1989, 29–62, IAEA, ISBN 92-0-1000592-XGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wotawa, G.; Denier, Ph.; DeGeer, L.-E.; Kalinowski, M.B.; Toivonen, H.; D’Amours, R.; Desiato, F.; Issartel, J.P.; Langer, M.; Seibert, P.; Frank, A.; Sloan, C.; Yamazawa, H. (2003): Atmospheric transport modelling in support of CTBT verification — Overview and basic concepts. Atmospheric Environment 37,18, 2529–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seibert, P. (2001): Inverse modelling with a Lagrangian particle dispersion model: applications to point releases over limited time intervals. In: Gryning, S.E., Schiermeier, F.A. (Eds.): Air polution modeling and its application XIV. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 381–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin · Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin B. Kalinowski
    • 1
  • Johann Feichter
    • 2
  • Mika Nikkinen
    • 3
  • Clemens Schlosser
    • 4
  1. 1.CTBTO PrepCom Provisional Technical SecretariatViennaAustria
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for MeteorologyHamburgGermany
  3. 3.International Atomic Energy AgencyViennaAustria
  4. 4.Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS)FreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations