Skip to main content

Evaluating the distribution and density of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in selected areas in German waters

  • Chapter
Progress in Marine Conservation in Europe

Abstract

The harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) is a small cetacean species occurring both in the German North Sea and Baltic Sea. In the process of designating marine protected areas in the framework of the European Habitats Directive (NATURA 2000), the German Federal Agency of Nature Conservation (BfN) identified candidate areas to be eventually proposed as Sites of Community Importance (pSCI). To evaluate the importance of these sites for harbour porpoises, their distribution and density were studied by conducting aerial surveys in the sites from May 2002 to September 2003 (further surveys are ongoing). Densities in the study areas were compared between study years as well as between the selected areas. The relative importance of sites was assessed by taking into account the overall distribution of porpoises in German waters. Surveys followed the standard line-transect methodology for aerial surveys. Only summer flights in the period from May to August were used for further analysis since the coverage by flights in autumn and winter was very low due to unfavourable weather conditions. In the German North Sea, 338 sightings of porpoise groups (440 individuals in total) were recorded in the summer of 2002, and 656 sightings (812 individuals in total) in the summer of 2003. In the Baltic Sea, sighting numbers in the same period were much smaller: 50 sightings (110 individuals) in 2002 and 34 sightings (43 individuals) in 2003. The main results showed clear aggregations and high densities of porpoises in the areas off the North Friesian islands of Sylt and Amrum, where there are high concentrations of the species in the summer months, which is their reproduction period. There seems to be a sharp gradient of density running from north to south. The highest density in both years was found in the study area Sylt Outer Reef (Sylter Außenriff), followed by the Doggerbank. Lowest densities were calculated for Borkum Reef Ground (Borkum-Riffgrund). The mean density did not differ significantly between study years in the same area. Harbour porpoise distribution in the Baltic Sea showed higher densities in the western part, namely in the Kiel Bight (Kieler Bucht) and Flensburg Fjord (Flensburger Förde), and in the eastern part close to the border of Poland. But all sightings east of the island of Rügen (study area Pommeranian Bay (Pommersche Bucht)) were only made in 2002. Thus, there is an enormous variation in the presence of habour porpoise in this area between the years. Currently surveys continue to determine how this area is used by harbour porpoises. Besides this, a clear west-east gradient in harbour porpoise density could be ascertained. The other two Baltic Sea study areas Fehmarn Belt (Fehmarnbelt) and Kadet Trench (Kadetrinne) are also used by porpoises, especially the area around the island of Fehmarn, but due to the small sizes of the areas additional investigation methods are applied, such as stationary acoustics (see chapter 12).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ascobans (2000) Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas. Proceedings of the third meeting of parties to ASCOBANS. Bristol, UK, 26–28 July 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke H, Siebert U (1994) Zur Situation der Kleinwale im Wattenmeer und in der südlichen Nordsee. In: Lozán JL, Rachor E, Reise K, v. Westernhagen H, Lenz W (eds) Warnsignale aus dem Wattenmeer. Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag, Berlin, pp 309–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke H, Siebert U, Lick R, Bandomir B, Weiss R (1998) The current status of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in German waters. Archive for Fishery and Marine Research 46(2):97–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren P (1995) A preliminary assessment of the status of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Swedish Skagerrak, Kattegat and Baltic seas. Paper SC/47/SM50 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 1995 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson P, Berggren P (1997) Morphometric comparisons of skulls of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the Baltic, Kattegat and Skagerrak seas. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75:280–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson P, Read AJ (2003) Variation in timing of conception between populations of the harbour porpoise. Journal of Mammalogy 84:948–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boye P, Hutterer R, Benke H (1998) Rote Liste der Säugetiere (Mammalia). In: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (eds) Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Deutschlands. Münster (Landwirtschaftsverlag). Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 55:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake J, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans PGH (1990) European cetaceans and seabirds in an oceanographic context. Lutra 33(2):95–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie D, Brown S, Lewis T, Matthews J, McLanaghan R, Moscrop A (2002) Preliminary results from acoustic and visual surveys for harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in German, Danish, Swedish and Polish waters during summer 2002. IFAW “Quick Look” Report. Song of the Whale Research Team, International Fund for Animal Welfare, London, UK (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PS, Benke H, Berggren P, Borchers DL, Buckland ST, Collet A, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Heimlich Boran S, Hiby AR, Leopold MF, Øien N (1995) Distribution and abundance of harbour porpoises and other small cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters. European Community LIFE Programme, Life, LIFE 92-2/IL/027

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PS, Berggren P, Benke H, Borchers DL, Buckland ST, Collet A, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Heimlich S, Hiby AR, Leopold MF, Øien N (2002) Abundance of harbour porpoise and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiby AR, Hammond PS (1989) Survey techniques for estimating the abundance of cetaceans. Reports of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 11:47–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiby AR, Lovell P (1998) Using aircraft in tandem formation to estimate abundance of harbour porpoise. Biometrics 54:1280–1289

    Google Scholar 

  • Hislop JRG, Harris MP, Smith JGM (1991) Variation in the calorific value and total energy content of the lesser sandeel (Ammodytes marinus) and other fish preyed on by seabirds. Journal of Zoology 224:501–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggenberger S, Benke H, Kinze CC (2002) Geographical variation in harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) skulls: support for a separate non-migratory population in the Baltic Proper. Ophelia 56(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson PD, Baker JR, Allchin CR, Law RJ, Kuiken T, Baker JR, Rogan E, Kirkwood JK (1999) Investigating potential associations between chronic exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and infectious disease mortality in harbour porpoises from England and Wales. The Science of the Total Environment 243/244:339–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinze CC (1994) Phocoena phocoena (Linnaeus 1758) — Schweinswal oder Kleintümmler (auch Braunfisch). In: Niethammer J, Krapp F (eds) Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Band 6: Meeressäuger. Aula Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 242–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer C, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Jensen J, Kinze CC. Sørensen TB (2001) Age, length and reproductive parameters of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena (L.) from West Greenland. ICES Journal of Marine Science 58:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae BB (1965) The food of the common porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). Journal of Zoology London 146:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read AJ (1990) Reproductive seasonality of harbour porpoises from the Bay of Fundy. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:284–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read AJ (2001) Trends in the maternal investment of harbour porpoises are uncoupled from the dynamics of their primary prey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:573–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Read AJ, Hohn AA (1995) Life in the fast lane: The life history of harbor porpoises from the Gulf of Maine. Marine Mammal Science 11:423–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders PJH (1992) Harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena in the North Sea: Numerical responses to changes in environmental conditions. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 26(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidat M, Kock K-H, Siebert U (2004) Summer distribution of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the German North and Baltic Sea. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 6(3):251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze G (1996) Die Schweinswale. Neue Brehm Bücherei, Magdeburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert U, Joiris C, Holsbeek L, Benke H, Failing K, Frese K, Petzinger E (1999) Potential relation between mercury concentrations and necropsy findings in cetaceans from German waters of the North and Baltic Seas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38:285–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann R, Harder J, Gmeiner C, Haase E (1996). Mitochondrial DNA patterns of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the North and the Baltic Sea. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 61:104–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinther M (1999) Bycatches of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena L.) in Danish set-net fisheries. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 1(2):123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PJ, Begg GS (1997) A spatial comparison of common guillemots and sandeels in Scottish waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54:578–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright PJ, Jensen H, Tuck I (2000) The influence of sediment type on the distribution of the lesser sandeel, Ammodytes marinus. Journal of Sea Research 44:243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheidat, M., Gilles, A., Siebert, U. (2006). Evaluating the distribution and density of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in selected areas in German waters. In: von Nordheim, H., Boedeker, D., Krause, J.C. (eds) Progress in Marine Conservation in Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33291-X_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics