Endoleak: Definition, Diagnosis, and Management

  • David Valenti
  • Jafar Golzarian
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

14.5 Conclusion

It seems certain that EVAR will continue to be a primary treatment for many years. Endoleak is an ongoing problem associated with EVAR. Imaging plays a critical role in detecting endoleak. CTA is the first line diagnostic modality. Optimal CTA protocol needs to include a delayed acquisition. There are many endovascular options available for treatment of persistent endoleaks. The optimal treatment depends on the type of the endoleak.


Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Inferior Mesenteric Artery Endovascular Repair Lumbar Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cuypers P, Buth J, Harris PL, et al (1999) Realistic expectations for patients with stent-graft treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results of a European multicentre registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 17:507–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parent FN, Meier GH, Godziachvili V et al (2002) The incidence and natural history of type I and II endoleak: a 5-year follow-up assessment with color duplex ultrasound scan. J Vasc Surg 35:474–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan CM, Rafferty EA, Geller EC et al (2001) Endovascular stent-graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms: The relationship between patent vessels that arise from the aneurismal sac and early endoleak. Radiology 218:176–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Golzarian J, Struyven J, Abada HT, et al (1997) Endovascular aortic stent-grafts: transcatheter embolization of persistent perigraft leaks. Radiology 22:731–734Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T, et al (2002) Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg 35:1029–1035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malina M, Lindblad B, Ivancev K, et al (1998) Endovascular AAA exclusion: Will stents with hooks and barbs prevent stent-graft migration? J Endovasc Surg 5:310–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    White GH, Yu W, May J, et al (1997) Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg 4:152–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buth J, Harris PL, van Marrewijk C, Fransen G (2003) The significance and management of different types of endoleaks. Semin Vasc Surg 16:95–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, et al (2000) Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 32:90–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Harris PL, et al (2002) Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the Eurostar experience. J Vasc Surg 35:461–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fransen GA, Vallabhaneni SR Sr, Van Marrewijk CJ, et al (2003) Rupture of infrarenal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: A series from EUROSTAR registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26:487–493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilling-Smith G, Brennan J, Harris P, Bakran A, Gould D, McWilliams R (1999) Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: definition, classification, and strategies for surveillance and intervention. J Endovasc Surg 6:305–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White GH, May W, Petrasek P, Waugh R, Stephen M, Harris J (1999) Endotension: an explanation for continued AAA growth after successful endoluminal repair. J Endovasc Surg 6:308–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilling-Smith GL, Martin J, Sudhindran S, et al (2000) Freedom from endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair does not equal treatment success. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19:421–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meier GH, Parker FM, Godziachvili V, et al (2001) Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: The Ancure experience. Vasc Surg 34:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Risberg B, Delle M, Lonn L, Syk I (2004) Management of aneurysm sac hygroma. J Endovasc Ther 11:191–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gorich J, Rilinger N, Sokiranski R et al (1999) Leakages after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: classification based on findings at CT, angiography, and radiography. Radiology 213:767–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorich J, Rilinger N, Kramer S, et al (2000) Angiography of leaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:811–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT, et al (1998) Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:329–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosenblit AM, Patlas M, Rosenbaum AT, et al (2003) Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: value of unenhanced and delayed CT acquisitions. Radiology 227:426–433Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sawhney R, Kerlen RK, Wall SD et al (2001) Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Radiology 220:157–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elkouri S, Panneton JM, Andrews JC, et al (2004) Computed tomography and ultrasound in follow-up of patients after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 18:271–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolf YG, Johnson BL, Hill BB, et al (2000) Duplex ultrasound scanning versus computed tomographic angiography for post-operative evaluation of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 32:1142–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zannetti S, De Rango P, Parente B, et al (2000) Role of duplex scan in endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19:531–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pages, S, Favre JP, Cerisier A, et al (2001) Comparison of color duplex ultrasound and computed tomography scan for surveillance after aortic endografting. Ann Vasc Surg 15:155–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Golzarian J, Murgo S, Dussaussois L, et al (2002) Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endoluminal treatment: comparison of color Doppler sonography with biphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:623–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McWilliams RG, Martin J, White D, et al (2002) Detection of endoleak with enhanced ultrasound imaging: comparison with biphasic computed tomography. J Endovasc Ther 9:170–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McLafferty RB, McCrary BS, Mattos MA, et al (2002) The use of color-flow duplex scan for the detection of endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 36:1–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Raman KG, Missing-Carroll N, Richardson T, et al (2003) Color-flow duplex ultrasound scan versus computed tomographic scan in the surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 38:645–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bendick PJ, Bove PG, Long GW, et al (2003) Efficacy of ultrasound scan contrast agents in the noninvasive followup of aortic stent grafts. J Vasc Surg 37:381–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Napoli V, Bargellini I, Sardella SG, et al (2004) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: contrast-enhanced US for missed endoleaks after endoluminal repair. Radiology 233:217–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haulon S, Lions C, McFadden EP, Koussa M, et al (1998) Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Endovasc Surg 22:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ayuso JR, de Caralt TM, Pages M, Riambau V, et al (2004) MRA is useful as a follow-up technique after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with nitinol endoprostheses. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:803–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cejna M, Loewe C, Schoder M, et al (2002) MR angiography vs CT angiography in the follow-up of Nitinol stent grafts in the endoluminally treated aortic aneurysms. Eur Radiology 12:2443–2450Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lutz AM, Willmann JK, Pfammatter T, Lachat M (2003) Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool. J Vasc Surg 37:619–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ersoy H, Jacobs P, Kent KK, Prince MR (2004) Blood pool MR angiography of aortic stentgraft endoleak. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1181–1186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lookstein RA, Goldman J, Pukin L, Marin ML (2004) Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography as a noninvasive method to characterize endoleaks: initial results compared with conventional angiography. J Vasc Surg 39:27–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hellinger JC, Draney M, Markl M, Pelc NJ, et al (2003) Application of cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging and SPAMM-tagging for assessment of endoleaks and aneurysm sac motion. Radiology 229:SS573, (Abstract)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amesur NB, Zajko AB, Orons PD, Makaroun MS (1999) Embolotherapy of persistent endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with the ancureendovascular technologies endograft system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:1175–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gorich J, Rilinger N, Sokiranski R et al (2000) Treatment of leaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. Radiology 215:414–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Faries PL, Cadot H, Agarwal G et al (2003) Management of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: cuffs, coils, and conversion. J Vasc Surg 37:1155–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sheehan M, Barbato j, Compton NC et al (20004) Effectiveness of coiling in the treatment of endoleak after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 40:430–434Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baum RA, Stavropoulos SW, Fairman RM, Carpenter JP (2003) Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1111–1117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA et al (2002) Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg 35:23–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL (1981) Complications of angiography. Radiology 138:273–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Martin ML, Dolmatch BL, Fry PD, Machan LS (2001) Treatment of Type II endoleaks with Onyx. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2:629–632Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schmid R, Gurke L, Aschwanden M, et al (2002) CT-guided percutaneous embolization of a lumbar artery maintaining a Type II endoleak. J Endovasc Ther 9:198–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    van den Berg JC, Nolthenius RP, Casparie JW et al (2001) CT-guided thrombin injection into aneurysm sac in a patient with endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1649–1651Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ellis PK, Kennedy PT, Collins AJ, Blair PH (2003) The use of direct thrombin injection to treat a Type II endoleak following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:482–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gambaro E, Abou-Zamzam AM Jr, Teruya TH et al (2004) Ischemic colitis following translumbar thrombin injection for treatment of endoleak. Ann Vasc Surg 18:74–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Numan F, Omeroglu A, Kara B, Cantasdemir M, Adaletli I, Kantarci F (2004) Embolization of peripheral vascular malformations with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx). J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:939–946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Steinmetz E, Rubin BG, Sanchez LA, et al (2004) Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg 39:306–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thoo CHC, Bourke BM, May J (2004) Symptomatic sac enlargement and rupture due to seroma after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with polytetrafluoroethylene graft: Implications for endovascular repair and Endotension. J Vasc Surg 40:1089–1094CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Valenti
    • 1
  • Jafar Golzarian
    • 2
  1. 1.Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of RadioloVascular and Interventional Radiology, University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations