Abstract
Human history is often seen as an inexorable march towards greater complexity — in ideas, artifacts, social, political and economic systems, technology, and in the structure of life itself. While we do not have detailed knowledge of ancient times, it is reasonable to conclude that the average resident of New York City today faces a world of much greater complexity than the average denizen of Carthage or Tikal. A careful consideration of this change, however, suggests that most of it has occurred recently, and has been driven primarily by the emergence of technology as a force in human life. In the 4000 years separating the Indus Valley Civilization from 18th century Europe, human transportation evolved from the bullock cart to the hansom, and the methods of communication used by George Washington did not differ significantly from those used by Alexander or Rameses. The world has moved radically towards greater complexity in the last two centuries. We have moved from buggies and letter couriers to airplanes and the Internet — an increase in capacity, and through its diversity also in complexity, orders of magnitude greater than that accumulated through the rest of human history. In addition to creating iconic artifacts — the airplane, the car, the computer, the television, etc. — this change has had a profound effect on the scope of experience by creating massive, connected and multiultra- level systems — traffic networks, power grids, markets, multinational corporations — that defy analytical understanding and seem to have a life of their own. This is where complexity truly enters our lives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, R. and A-L. Barabasi (2002) “Statistical mechanics of complex networks,” Review of Modern Physics 74, pp. 47–97.
Bak, P. (1996) How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality, Springer-Verlag Telos.
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997) Dynamics of Complex Systems, Perseus Press.
Bar-Yam, Y. (2002a) General features of complex Systems, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), EOLSS Publishers.
Bar-Yam, Y. (2002b) Enlightened Evolutionary Engineering / Implementation of Innovation in FORCEnet, Report to Chief of Naval Operations Strategic Studies Group (May 1, 2002) http://www.necsi.org/projects/yaneer/SSG_NECSI_ 2_E3_2.pdf
Bar-Yam, Y. (2003a) Unifying principles in complex systems, in Converging Technology (NBIC) for Improving Human Performance, M. C. Roco and W. S. Bainbridge eds, Kluwer.
Bar-Yam, Y. (2003b) When systems engineering fails—toward complex systems engineering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 2003, Vol. 2, 2021–2028, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
Bar-Yam Y. and Kuras M, (2004) Complex systems and evolutionary engineering, AOC Concept Paper, http://www.necsi.org/projects/yaneer/AOCs_ as_complex_systems.pdf
Bar-Yam, Y. (2005) Making Things Work, NECSI Knowledge Press.
Barabasi, A.-L. and E. Bonabeau (2003) “Scale-free networks” Scientific American 288, pp. 60–69.
Barabasi, A.-L. (2002) Linked: the New Science of Networks, Perseus Books.
Bonabeau, E., M. Dorigo and G. Theraulaz (1999) Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bornholdt, S. and H. G. Schuster (Eds.) (2002) Handbook of graphs and networks: from the genome to the Internet, Berlin: Wiley-VCH.
Braha, D. and Y. Bar-Yam (2006) “The Statistical Mechanics of Complex Product Development: Empirical and Analytical Results,” Management Science (forthcoming).
Braha, D. and Y. Bar-Yam (2004) “The Topology of Large-Scale Engineering Problem-Solving Networks,” Physical Review E. 69, 016113.
Braha, D. and O. Maimon (1998a) A Mathematical Theory of Design: Foundations, Algorithms and Applications, Kluwer, Boston.
Braha, D. and O. Maimon (1998b) “The Measurement of a Design Structural and Functional Complexity” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetic. Part A. 28 (4), pp.527–535.
Carlson, J.M and J.C. Doyle (2000) “Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and design in complex systems,” Physical Review Letters 84, pp. 2529–2532.
Carlson, J. M. and J.C. Doyle (2002) “Complexity and robustness,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 44 (suppl. 1), pp. 2539–2545.
Dawkins, R. (1986) The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design, London, UK: W.W. Norton and Co.
Dorigo, M., G. Di Caro and L.M. Gambardella (1999) “Ant algorithms for discrete optimization,” Artificial Life 5, pp. 137–172.
Dorogovtsev, S.N. and J.F.F. Mendes (2003) Evolution of networks: from biological nets to the Internet and WWW, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Klein, M., H. Sayama, P. Faratin, and Y. Bar-Yam. (2002) A Complex Systems Perspective on Computer-Supported Collaborative Design Technology. Communications of the ACM, 45, No. 11, pp. 27–31.
Kube, C.R. and H. Zhang (1992) “Collective robotic intelligence,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pp. 460–468.
Li, L., D. Alderson, R. Tanaka, J.C. Doyle and W. Willinger (2004) “Towards a theory of scale-free fraphs: definition, properties and implications (extended version),” arXiv:cond-mat/0501169v1.
Mataric, M.J. (2001) “Learning in behavior-based multi-robot systems: policies, models, and other agents,” Cognitive Systems Research (special issue on multidisciplinary studies of multi-agent learning) 2, pp. 81–93.
Maimon, O. and D. Braha (1996) “On the Complexity of the Design Synthesis Problem,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetic. Part A. 26 (1), pp.142–150.
Nagpal, R. (2001) Programmable Self-Assembly: Constructing Global Shape using Biologically-inspired Local Interactions and Origami Mathematics, PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT.
Sole, R.V., R. Ferrer, J. M. Montoya, and S. Valverde. (2002) “Selection, tinkering, and emergence in complex networks,” Complexity 8, pp. 20–33.
Stauffer, D. and A. Aharony (1994) Introduction to Percolation Theory, London: Taylor & Francis.
Tanaka, R. and Doyle, J.C. (2004) “Scale-rich metabolic networks: background and introduction,” arXiv:q-bio.MN/0410009 v1.
Weiss, G. (1999) Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wooldridge, M. (2002) Introduction to MultiAgent Systems, John Wiley & Sons.
Yassine, A. N. Joglekar, D. Braha, S. Eppinger, and D. Whitney (2003) “Information Hiding in Product Development: The Design Churn Effect,” Research in Engineering Design 14 (3), pp. 131–144.
Zhao, F. and L. Guibas (2004) Wireless sensor networks, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Braha, D. and Y. Reich (2003) “Topological Structures for Modeling Complex Engineering Design Processes,” Research in Engineering Design 14 (4), pp. 185–199.
Edelman, G.M. and J.A. Gally, (2001) “Degeneracy and complexity in biology systems,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, pp. 13763–13768.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mina, A., Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y. (2006). Complex Engineered Systems: A New Paradigm. In: Braha, D., Minai, A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Complex Engineered Systems. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32834-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32834-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32831-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32834-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)