Skip to main content

Interactive Decision Support Based on Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms

  • Conference paper
Operations Research Proceedings 2005

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP,volume 2005))

4 Conclusions

Although, we do not yet have practical experiences with using the new approach for multicriteria decision support and optimization, it is appealing because the interaction between navigation interface and MOEA solves two problems at the same time. First, the MOEA provides a new and effective means for feeding the navigtion interface with data on solutions to a hard-to-solve multiobjective optimization problem in an on-line fashion. The usage of solution interpolation or a database resulting from a computationally expensive apriori calculation of solutions can be avoided, at least in part.

Secondly, information from the navigation interface allows the MOEA to concentrate on a preferable subset of solutions which is frequently much smaller than the whole set of Pareto-optimal solutions. Thus, the computational effort of the MOEA may decrease drastically.

The asynchronous concept of the communication between user interface and MOEA avoids waiting times both for the human user and for the computer. A user has still the possibility to let the MOEA run autonomously for a longer time (or until a stopping criterion for the MOEA is reached) and then navigate through the final result of the algorithm. Thus, complexity of user input and frequency may be kept to an acceptable amount.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchanan JT (1994) An experimental evaluation of interactive MCDM methods and the decision making process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45,9, 1050–1059

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchanan JT, Daellenbach HG (1987) A comparative evaluation of interactive solution methods for multiple objective decision models. European Journal of Operations Research 29:353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coello Coello CA (2000) Handling preferences in evolutionary multiobjective optimization: A survey. In: 2000 Congress Evolutionary Computation Proc. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cvetkovic D, Parmee IC (2002) Preferences and their application in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 6(1):42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehrgott M, Gandibleux X (eds) (2002) Multiple criteria Optimization: State of the art annotated bibliographic surveys. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gal T, Hanne T (1997) On the development and future aspects of vector optimization and MCDM. A tutorial. In: Climaco J (ed) Multicriteria analysis. Springer Berlin, 130–145

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanne T (2001) Selection and mutation strategies in evolutionary algorithms for global multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Optimization 3(1):27–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanne T (2005) On the Scheduling of Construction Sites Using Single-and Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Proceedings of MIC 2005: The Sixth Metaheuristics International Conference. Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hanne T (2004) Five open issues in solving MOCO problems. Discussion of the article Approximative solution methods by for multiobjective combinatorial optimization by M. Ehrgott and X. Gandibleux. TOP 12(1): 70–76

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanne T, Nickel S. (2005) A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for scheduling and inspection planning in software development projects. European Journal of Operational Research 167:663–678

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaskiewicz A (2005) The use of pairwise comparisons in interactive hybrid evolutionary algorithms. Multiple objective knapsack problem case study. In: Proceedings of MIC2005: The Sixth Metaheuristics International Conference. Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  13. Küfer K-H, Monz M, Scherrer A, Süss P, Alonso F, Sultan ASA, Bortfeld T, Craft D, Thieke C (2005) Multicriteria optimization in intensity modulated radiotherapy planning. Report of the Fraunhofer ITWM 77

    Google Scholar 

  14. Phelps SP, Köksalan M (2003) An Interactive Evolutionary Metaheuristic for Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization Management Science 49,12, 2003, 1726–1738

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart T (1999) Concepts of interactive programming. In: Gal T, Stewart T, Hanne T (eds): Multicriteria decision making Advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory, and applications. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwefel H-P (1994) On the evolution of evolutionary computation. In: Zurada JM, Marks II RJ, Robinson CJ (eds): Computational intelligence-Imitating life. IEEE Press, Piscataway NJ, 116–124

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steuer RE (1986) Multiple criteria optimization. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan KC, Khor EF, Lee TH (2005) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Trinkaus HL, Hanne T (2005) knowCube: a visual and interactive support for multicriteria decision making. Computers & Operations Research 32:1289–1309

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria decision-aid. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wierzbicki AP (1999) Reference point approaches. In: Gal T, Stewart T, Hanne T (eds):Multicriteria decision making. Advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory, and applications. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hanne, T. (2006). Interactive Decision Support Based on Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Haasis, HD., Kopfer, H., Schönberger, J. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2005. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32539-5_119

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics