Advertisement

Shoes

  • James S. Taylor
  • Emel Erkek
  • Patricia Podmore
Chapter

Keywords

Natural Rubber Contact Dermatitis Patch Testing Allergic Contact Dermatitis Natural Rubber Latex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van Coevorden AM, Coenraads PJ, Pas HH, van der Valk PG (2002) Contact allergens in shoe leather among patients with foot eczema. Contact Dermatitis 46:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trattner A, Farchi Y, David M (2003) Shoe contact dermatitis in Israel. Am J Contact Dermat 14:12–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freeman S (1997) Shoe dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 36:247–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roul S, Ducombs G, Leaute-Labrege C (1996) Footwear contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis 34:334–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cronin E (1966) Shoe dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 78:617–625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cockayne SE, Shok M, Messinger AG (1998) Foot dermatitis in children: causative allergens and followup. Contact Dermatitis 38:203–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shackelford KE, Belsito DV (2002) The etiology of allergic-appearing foot dermatitis: A 5-year retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol 47:715–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guenst BJ (1999) Common pediatric foot dermatoses. J Pediatr Health Care 13:68–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lynde CW, Warshawski L, Mitchell JC (1982) Patch test results with a shoe wear screening tray in 119 patients (1977–1980). Contact Dermatitis 8:423–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saha M, Srinivas CR, Shenoy SD (1993) Footwear dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 28:260–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Storrs FJ (1986). Dermatitis from clothing and shoes. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 283–337Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rani Z, Hussain I, Haroon TS (2003) Common allergens in shoe dermatitis: our experience in Lahore, Pakistan. Int J Dermatol 42:605–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strauss RM, Wilkinson SM (2002) Shoe dermatitis due to colophonium used as leather tanning or finishing agent in Portuguese shoes. Contact Dermatitis 47:59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen HH, Sun CC, Tseng MP (2004) Type IV hypersensitivity from rubber chemicals: a 15-year experience in Taiwan. Dermatology 208:319–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Belsito DV (2004) Patch testing with a standard allergen (“screening”) tray: rewards and risks. Derm Ther 17:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Romaguera C, Vilaplana J (1998) Contact dermatitis in children: 6 years experience (1992–1997). Contact Dermatitis 39:277–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goossens A, Bedert R, Zimerson E (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nickel and cobalt in green plastic shoes. Contact Dermatitis 45:172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shoe contact dermatitis (2001) In: Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr (eds) Fisher’s contact dermatitis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 305–319Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oumeish OY, Parish LC (2002) Marching in the army: common cutaneous disorders of the feet. Clin Dermatol 20:445–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brooks C, Kujawska A, Patel D (2003) Cutaneous allergic reactions induced by sporting activities. Sports Med 33:699–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Metelitsa A, Barankin B, Lin AN (2004) Diagnosis of sports-related dermatoses. Int J Dermatol 43:113–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Belsito DV (2003) Common shoe allergens undetected by commercial patch-testing kits: dithiodimorpholine and isocyanates. Am J Contact Dermat 14:95–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hansen MB, Johansen JD, Menne T (2003) Chromium allergy: significance of both Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Contact Dermatitis 49:206–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wolf R, Orion E, Matz H (2002) Contact dermatitis in military personnel. Clin Dermatol 20:439–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fishman TD (2000) Wound assessment and evaluation. Dermatol Nurs 12:194–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Podmore P (1995) Shoes. In: Rycroft RJG et al (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 516–526Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rietschel RL (1984) Role of socks in shoe dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 120:398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maibach H (1984) Panty hose dermatitis resembling and complicating tinea pedis. Contact Dermatitis 1:329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saha M, Srinivas CR, Shenoy SD (1993) Sensitivity to topical medicaments among suspected cases of footwear dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 28:44–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saha M, Srinivas CR (1993) Footwear dermatitis possibly due to para-phenylenediamine in socks. Contact Dermatitis 28:295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Giusti F, Massone F, Bertoni L, Pellacani G, Seidenari S (2000) Contact sensitization to disperse dyes in children. Pediatr Dermatol 20:393–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilkinson SM, Thomson KF (2000) Foot dermatitis due to non-disperse azo dyes. Contact Dermatitis 42:162–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lear JT, English JS (1996) Hand involvement in allergic contact dermatitis from mercaptobenzothiazole in shoes. Contact Dermatitis 34:432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li LF, Wang J (2002) Contact hypersensitivity in hand dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 47:206–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Warshaw EM (2004) Therapeutic options for chronic hand dermatitis. Derm Ther 17:240–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Calnan CD, Peachey RDG (1972) Allergic contact purpura. Clin Allergy 1:287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zaitz ID, Proenca NG, Broste D (1987) Achromatizing contact dermatitis caused by rubber sandals (Portuguese). Medicina Cutanea Ibero-Latino-Americana 15:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pandhi KK, Kumar AS (1985) Contact leukoderma due to “Bindi” and footwear. Dermatologica 170:260–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bajaj AK, Supta SC, Challerjee AK (1996) Footwear depigmentation. Contact Dermatitis 35:117–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Koch P (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis. Recognition and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 2:353–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rutland FH (1991) Environmental compatibility of chromium-containing tannery and other leather product wastes at land disposal sites. J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 86:364–375Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Long AJ, Corey NJ, Wood CB (2000) Potential chemical mechanisms causing false positive results in hexavalent chromium determinations. J Soc Leather Technol Chemists 84:74–78Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Corey NJ (2002) An update on environmental constraints. J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 97:496–505Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Directive 2002/61/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002. Official Journal of the European Communities 11/9/2002 L243:15–18Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Adminis U, Huynh C, Money CA (2002) The need for improved fungicides for wet-blue. J Soc Leather Technol Chemists 86:118–121Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Harvey AJ (1983) Footwear materials and process technology. LASRA (New Zealand Leather and Shoe Research Association), Palmerston North, New Zealand, pp 257Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Podmore P (1995) Shoes. In: Guin JD (ed) Practical contact dermatitis. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 325–332Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Aye M, Masson EA (2002) Dermatological care of the diabetic foot. Am J Clin Dermatol 3:463–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lammintausta K, Kalimi K (1995) Sensitivity to rubber. Study with rubber mixes and individual rubber chemicals. Dermatosen 33:204–208Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fogh A, Pock-Steen B (1992) Contact sensitivity to thiuram in wooden shoes. Contact Dermatitis 27:348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kaniwa MA, Jsoma K, Nakomura O et al (1994) Identification of causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of patch testing in patients and chemical analysis. Application to cases from rubber footwear. Contact Dermatitis 30:26–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Roberts JL, Hanifin JM (1979) Athletic shoe dermatitis, contact allergy to ethylbutylthiourea. J Am Med Assoc 241:275–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Roberts JL, Hanifin JM (1980) Contact allergy and cross-reactivity to substituted thiourea compounds. Contact Dermatitis 6:138–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 738Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Malten K, Seutter E (1985) Allergic degradation products of paratertiary butyl phenol for formaldehyde plastic. Contact Dermatitis 12:222–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Malten KE, Roth R, Pastors PH (1983) Paratertiary butyl phenol formaldehyde and other causes of shoe dermatitis. Derm Beruf Umwelt 31:149–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Malten KE (1967) Contact sensitizations caused by paratertiary butyl phenol and certain phenol formaldehyde-containing glues. Dermatologica 135:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lyon CC, Tucker SC, Gafvert E, Karlberg AT, Beck MH (1999) Contact dermatitis from modified rosin in footwear. Contact Dermatitis 41:102–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Huygens S, Barbaud A, Goossens A (2001) Frequency and relevance of positive patch tests to cyclohexylthiophthalimide, a new rubber allergen. Eur J Dermatol 11:443–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Devos SA, Van Der Valk PG (2001) The risk of active sensitization to PPD. Contact Dermatitis 44:273–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hartmann K, Hunzelmann N (2004) Allergic contact dermatitis from cinnamon as an odour-neutralizing agent in shoe insoles. Contact Dermatitis 50:253–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mancuso G, Reggiani M, Berdonidini RM (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis in shoemakers. Contact Dermatitis 34:17–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bruze M, Bjoskner B, Lepoittevin JP (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 32:156–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ayadi M, Martin P (1999) Pulpitis of the fingers from a shoe glue containing 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT). Contact Dermatitis 40:115–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Vidovic R, Kansky A (1985) Contact dermatitis in workers processing polyvinyl chloride. Derm Beruf Umwelt 33:104–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Henschel R, Agathos M, Breit R (2002) Occupational contact dermatitis from propolis. Contact Dermatitis 47:52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Machado S, Silva E, Sanches M, Massa A (2003) Occupational airborne contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 14:31–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Adams RM (1990) Shoe repairers. In: Adams RM (ed) Occupational skin disease. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 662–663Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    White IR (1990) PTBP resins. In: Adams RM (ed) Occupational skin disease. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 402–403Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Taylor JS (1986) Rubber. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 603–643Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dooms-Goossens A et al (1987) Shoe dermatitis. Boll Dermatol Allergol Profess 2:120–126Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Grimalt F, Romaguera C (1975) New resin allergens in shoe contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1:169–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jelen G, Cavelier C, Protois JP (1989) A new allergen responsible for shoe allergy: chloracetamide. Contact Dermatitis 21:110–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lynch PJ (1969) Indian sandal strap dermatitis. J Am Med Assoc 209:1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Epstein E (1969) Shoe contact dermatitis. J Am Med Assoc 209:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Calnan CD, Sarkany L (1959) Studies in contact dermatitis: IX. Shoe dermatitis. Tran St John Hosp Derm Soc 43:8–26Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Jordan WP (1972) Clothing and shoe dermatitis. Postgrad Med 52:143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bruze M et al (1992) Patch testing with ultrasonic bath extracts. Am J Contact Dermatitis 3:133–137Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jung JH, McLaughlin JL, Stannard J, Guin JD (1988) Isolation, via activity-directed fractionation, of mercaptobenzothiazole and dibenzothiazyl disulfide as 2 allergens responsible for tennis shoe dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 19:254–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Nishioka K et al (1996) Contact dermatitis due to rubber boots worn by Japanese farmers, with special attention to 6-ethoxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (ETMDQ) sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 35:241–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Koch P, Nickolaus G (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis and mercury exanthem due to mercury chloride in plastic boots. Contact Dermatitis 34:405–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Emmett EA, Risby TH, Taylor JS (1994) Skin elicitation threshold of ethylbutylthiourea and mercaptobenzothiazole with relative leaching from sensitizing products (published erratum appears in Contact Dermatitis 1994, 31: 208). Contact Dermatitis 30:85–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Opie J, Lee A, Frowen K, Fewings J, Nixon R (2003) Foot dermatitis caused by the textile dye Basic Red 46 in acrylic blend socks. Contact Dermatitis 49:297–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Steck WD (1983) Juvenile plantar dermatosis: the “wet and dry foot syndrome”. Cleve Clin Q 50:145–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Downs AM, Sansom JE (1999) Severe contact allergy to footwear responding to handmade shoes. Contact Dermatitis 40:218PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • James S. Taylor
    • 1
  • Emel Erkek
    • 1
  • Patricia Podmore
    • 2
  1. 1.A-61 Dermatology, Cleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Anderson HouseAltnagelvin HospitalLondonderryUK

Personalised recommendations