Advertisement

Metalworking Fluids

  • Johannes Geier
  • Holger Lessmann

Keywords

Contact Dermatitis Allergic Contact Dermatitis Contact Allergy Hand Eczema Irritant Contact Dermatitis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allenby CF, Basketter DA (1989) Minimum eliciting patch test concentrations of cobalt. Contact Dermatitis 20:185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alomar A, Conde-Salazar L, Romaguera C (1985) Occupational dermatoses from cutting oils. Contact Dermatitis 12:129–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anonymous (1991) DIN 51385 Schmierstoffe; Kühlschmierstoffe; Begriffe. Beuth, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anonymous (1993) Technische Regeln für Gefahrstoffe (TRGS) 611, Verwendungsbeschränkungen für wassermischbare bzw. wassergemischte Kühlschmierstoffe, bei deren Einsatz N-Nitrosamine auftreten können. Heymanns, Cologne, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anonymous (1999) Berufsgenossenschaftliche Regeln für Sicherheit und Gesundheit bei der Arbeit, BGR 143. Heymanns, Cologne, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anonymous (2000) Kühlschmierstoffe. In: Greim H (ed) Gesundheitsschädliche Arbeitsstoffe. Toxikologisch-arbeitsmedizinische Begründungen von MAK-Werten. 31. Lieferung. VCH, Weinheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arnold WP, van Joost T, van der Valk PGM (1995) Adding p-aminoazobenzene may increase the sensitivity of the European standard series in detecting contact allergy to dyes, but carries the risk of active sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 33:444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bauer A, Geier J, Lessmann H, Elsner P (2004) Kontaktallergien gegen Textilfarbstoffe. Ergebnisse des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK). Aktuel Dermatol 30:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Elsener P (2000) Hand eczema in metalworker trainees — an analysis of risk factors. Contact Dermatitis 43:327–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brasch J, Schnuch A, Geier J, Aberer W, Uter W: German Contact Dermatitis Research Group; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (2004) Iodopropynylbutyl carbamate (IPBC) 0.2% is suggested for patch testing of patients with eczema possibly related to preservatives. Br J Dermatol 151:608–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brinkmeier T, Geier J, Lepoittevin JP, Frosch PJ (2002) Patch test reactions to Biobans in metalworkers are often weak and not reproducible. Contact Dermatitis 47:27–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruze M, Hradil E, Eriksohn IL, Gruvberger B, Widström L (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from alkanolamineborates in metalworking fluids. Contact Dermatitis 332:24–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crow KD, Peachey RDG, Adams JE (1978) Coolant oil dermatitis due to ethylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 4:359–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Boer EM, van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP (1989) Dermatoses in metal workers. (I). Irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 20:212–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Boer EM, van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP (1989) Dermatoses in metal workers. (II). Allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 20:280–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Einarsson Ö, Kylin B, Lindstedt G, Wahlberg JE (1975) Chromium, cobalt and nickel in used cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 1:182–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Einarsson Ö, Eriksson E, Lindstedt G, Wahlberg JE (1979) Dissolution of cobalt from hard metal alloys by cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 5:129–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fewings J, Menné T (1999) An update of the risk assessment for methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) with focus on rinse-off products. Contact Dermatitis 41:1–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fisher AA (1998) Ethylenediamine hydrochloride versus amines in cutting oils. Am J Contact Dermat 9:139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foulds IS (2000) Cutting fluids. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology, Chap 86. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 691–700Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Peiler D, Dreier B, Rabenhorst S (1997) Die Epikutantestung mit patienteneigenen Produkten. In: Plewig G, Przybilla B (eds) Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie 15. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 166–181Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Funke U, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL (2001) Incidence of work-related hand eczema during apprenticeship: first results of a prospective cohort study in the car industry. Contact Dermatitis 44:166–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Geier J, Schnuch A (1996) No cross sensitization between MCI/MI, benzisothiazolinone and octylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis 34:148–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geier J, Fuchs T, Schnuch A (1996) Zunahme der Kontaktallergien gegen Methyldibromoglutaronitril in Deutschland. Allergologie 19:399–402Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Fuchs T (1997) Kontaktallergien durch formaldehydabspaltende Biozide. Eine Analyse der Daten des IVDK aus den Jahren 1992 bis 1995. Allergologie 20:215–224Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geier J, Lessmann H, Schumacher T, Eckert C, Becker D, Boveleth W, Buß M, Eck E, Englitz H-G, Koch P, Müller J, Nöring R, Rocker M, Rothe A, Schmidt A, Uter W, Warfolomeow I, Zoellner G (2000) Vorschlag für die Epikutantestung bei Verdacht auf Kontaktallergie durch Kühlschmierstoffe. 1. Kommerziell erhältliche Testsubstanzen. Derm Beruf Umwelt 48:232–23Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Geier J, Schnuch A, Brasch J, Gefeller O (2000) Patch testing with methyldibromoglutaronitrile. Am J Contact Dermat 11:207–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Geier J, Lessmann H, Graefe A, Fuchs T (2002) Contact allergy to diglycolamine in a water-based metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 46:121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Geier J, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ, Pirker C, Koch P, Aschoff R, Richter G, Becker D, Eckert C, Uter W, Schnuch A, Fuchs T (2003) Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids. Contact Dermatitis 49:85–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Geier J, Lessmann H, Schmidt A, Englitz HG, Schnuch A (2003) Kontaktekzeme durch Kühlschmierstoffe in der Metallindustrie. Aktuel Dermatol 29:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Geier J, Lessmann H, Dickel H, John SM, Frosch PJ, Koch P, Becker D, Jappe U, Aberer W, Schnuch A, Uter W (2004) Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Contact Dermatitis 51:118–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Uter W (2004) Contact sensitizations in metalworkers with occupational dermatitis exposed to water-based metalworking fluids: results of the research project “FaSt”. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:543–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ (2004) Patch testing with metalworking fluids from the patient’s workplace. Contact Dermatitis 51:172–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grattan CEH, English JSC, Foulds IS, Rycroft RJG (1989) Cutting fluid dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 20:372–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gruvberger B, Isaksson M, Frick M, Pontén A, Bruze M (2003) Occupational dermatoses in a metalworking plant. Contact Dermatitis 48:80–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hausen BM, Krohn K, Budianto E (1990) Contact allergy due to colophony. (VII). Sensitizing studies with oxidation products of abietic and related acids. Contact Dermatitis 23:352–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hausen BM, Börries M, Budianto E, Krohn K (1993) Contact allergy due to colophony. (IX). Sensitization studies with further products isolated after oxidative degradation of resin acids and colophony. Contact Dermatitis 29:234–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hausen BM, Brinkmann J, Dohn W (1998) Lexikon der Kontaktallergene, 6. Ergänzungs-Lieferung, Kolophonium, K 4. Ecomed, Landsberg, Germany, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hornstein OP (1984) Ekzemkrankheiten. Therapiewoche 34:400–409Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ippen H (1979) Allergische Hautschäden bei der Metallbearbeitung. Derm Beruf Umwelt 27:71–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Isaksson M (2002) Delayed diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis from sodium pyrithione in a metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 47:248–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Isaksson M, Frick M, Gruvberger B, Pontén A, Bruze M (2002) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from the extreme pressure (EP) additive, zinc, bis ((O,O’-di-2-ethylhexyl) dithiophosphate) in neat oils. Contact Dermatitis 46:248–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jensen CD, Andersen KE (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from a condensate of boric acid, monoethanolamine and fatty acids in a metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 49:45–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K, Kanerva L (2000) Patch testing with a patient’s own materials handled at work. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology, Chap 47. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 375–383Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kanerva L, Tupasela O, Jolanki R (2001) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethylhexylzinc dithiophosphate and fatty acid polydiethanolamide in cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 44:193–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Karlberg A-T (1991) Air oxidation increases the allergenic potential of tall oil rosin. Colophony contact allergens also identified in tall oil resin. Am J Contact Dermat 2:43–49Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Koch P (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from oleyl alcohol and monoethanolamine in a metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 33:273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Krbek F, Schäfer Th (1991) Untersuchungen an Tropfen und Rückständen von wassermischbaren Kühlschmierstoffen. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Präventivmed 26:411–416Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    le Coz C-J (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from sodium pyrithione in metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 45:58–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lehmann E, Fröhlich N (1993) Kühlschmierstoffe —Zusätzliche Belastungen durch Metallionen? Amtliche Mitteilungen der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz, Januar 1993, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Majoie IML, van Ginkel CJW (2000) The biocide iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC) as an allergen in cutting oils. Contact Dermatitis 43:238–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Malten KE (1981) Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 7:238–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Malten KE (1987) Old and new, mainly occupational dermatological problems in the production and processing of plastics. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn. Yearbook Medical, Chicago, Ill., p 310Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Meding B (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis from tertiary-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) in a cutting fluid. Contact Dermatitis 34:224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Minkwitz R, Fröhlich N, Lehmann E (1983) Untersuchungen von Schadstoffbelastungen an Arbeitspl↦zen bei der Herstellung und Verarbeitung von Metallen — Beryllium, Cobalt und deren Legierungen. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz, Fb 367, Dortmund, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mowad CM (2000) Methylchloro-isothiazolinone revisited. Am J Contact Dermat 11:114–118Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nethercott JR, Rothman N, Holness DL, O’Toole T (1990) Health problems in metal workers exposed to a coolant oil containing Kathon 886 MW. Am J Contact Dermat 1:94–99Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Owen CM, August PJ, Beck MH (2000) Contact allergy to oak moss resin in a soluble oil. Contact Dermatitis 43:112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pfeiffer W, Breuer D, Blome H, Deninger C et al (1996) BIA-Report 7/96 Kühlschmierstoffe. Herausgegeben vom Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften (HVBG), Sankt Augustin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Piebenga WP, van der Walle HB (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from 1-[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-(2-propenyloxy) ethyl]-1H-imidazole in a water-based metalworking fluid. Contact Dermatitis 48:285–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pryce DW, Irvine D, English JSC, Rycroft RJG (1989) Soluble oil dermatitis: a follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis 21:28–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Pryce DW, White I, English JSC, Rycroft RJG (1989) Soluble oil dermatitis: a review. J Soc Occup Med 39:93–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Robinson MK, Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, McNamee P, White IR, Basketter DA (2000) The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 42:251–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rycroft RJG (1987) Cutting fluids, oil, and lubricants. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn. Yearbook Medical, Chicago, Ill., p 289Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rystedt I (1979) Evaluation and relevance of isolated test reactions to cobalt. Contact Dermatitis 5:233–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Scheinman PL (1996) Multiple sensitizations in a machinist using a new cooling fluid. Am J Contact Dermat 7:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Schnuch A, Geier J, Brasch J, Uter W (2002) The preservative iodopropynyl butylcarbamate: frequency of allergic reactions and diagnostic considerations. Results from the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 46:153–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ (1996) Prognosis of occupational hand dermatitis in metalworkers. Contact Dermatitis 34:27–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Skudlik C, Schwanitz H-J (2003) Berufsbedingte Handekzeme — Ätiologie und Prävention. Allergo J 12:513–52Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sonnenschein G (1998) Kühlschmierstoffe. In: Konietzko J, Dupuis H (eds) Handbuch der Arbeitsmedizin, 20. Ergänzungslieferung 5/98, Kap IV-2.47.1. Ecomed, Landsberg, Germany, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Thamm H (1997) Formaldehyd und Formaldehydabspalter in Kühlschmierstoffen: aktueller Stand. Allergologie 20:232–238Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Tiedemann K-H, Zoellner G, Adam M, Becker D, Boveleth W, Eck E, Eckert C, Englitz H-G, Geier J, Koch P, Lessmann H, Müller J, Nöring R, Rocker M, Rothe A, Schmidt A, Schumacher T, Uter W, Warfolomeow I, Wirtz C (2002) Empfehlungen für die Epikutantestung bei Verdacht auf Kontaktallergie durch Kühlschmierstoffe. 2. Hinweise zur Arbeitsstofftestung. Derm Beruf Umwelt 50:180–189Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Uter W, Schaller S, Bahmer FA, Brasch J et al (1993) Contact allergy in metal workers — a one-year analysis based on data collected by the “Information Network of Dermatological Clinics” (IVDK) in Germany. Derm Beruf Umwelt 41:220–22Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Uter W, Geier J, Ippen H (1996) Nachrichten aus dem IVDK: Aktuelle Sensibilisierungshäufigkeiten bei der DKG-Testreihe “Metallverarbeitung”. Derm Beruf Umwelt 44:34–36Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A (1999) Unverträglichkeitsreaktionen gegen Körperpflege-und Haushaltsprodukte: was ist zu tun? Die Informations-und Dokumentationsstelle für Kontaktallergien (IDOK) des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK). Deutsche Dermatologe 47:211–214Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Uter W, Gefeller O, Geier J, Lessmann H, Pfahlberg A, Schnuch A (2002) Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit der Sensibilisierung gegen wichtige Allergene von arbeitsbedingten sowie individuellen Faktoren. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Forschung, Fb 949. Wissenschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Becker D, Fuchs Th, Richter G; IDVK Study Group; German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) (2002) The spectrum of allergic (cross-)sensitivity in clinical patch testing with “para amino” compounds. Allergy 7:319–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wahlberg JE (1973) Thresholds of sensitivity in metal contact allergy. 1. Isolated and simultaneous allergy to chromium, cobalt, mercury and-or nickel. Berufsdermatosen 21:22–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wahlberg JE, Lindstedt G, Einarsson cobalt and nickel in Swedish cement, detergents, mould and cutting oils. Berufsdermatosen 25:220–228Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Camarasa JM, Diepgen TL, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, Goossens A, Lachappelle JM, Lahti A, Menne T, Seidenari S, Tosti A, Wahlberg JE (2002) Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991–2000). Contact Dermatitis 46:207–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Geier
    • 1
  • Holger Lessmann
    • 2
  1. 1.IVDK, Universitäts-HautklinikGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.IVDK, Universitäts HautklinikGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations