Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Skin Penetration

  • Chapter
Contact Dermatitis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Higuchi T (1960) Physical chemical analysis of percutaneous absorption process from creams and ointments. J Soc Cosmet Chem 11:85

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guy RH, Hadgraft J (1989) Mathematical models of percutaneous absorption. In: Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI (eds) Percutaneous absorption. Dekker, New York, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guy RH, Hadgraft J, Maibach AJ (1982) A pharmacokinetic model for percutaneous absorption. Int J Pharmaceut 11:119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta SK et al (1993) Pharmokinetic and pharmodynamic modeling of transdermal products: in vivo methods, problems, and pitfalls. In: Shah VP, Maibach HI (eds) Topical drug bioavailability: bioequivalence and penetration. Plenum, New York, p 311

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuboto K et al (1993) Percutaneous absorption: a single model. J Pharm Sci 82:450

    Google Scholar 

  6. Williams PL, Riviere JE (1995) A biophysically based dermatopharmokinetic compartment model for quantifying percutaneous penetration and absorption of topically applied agents. 1. Theory. J Pharm Sci 84:599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain MK (1980) In: Jain MK, Wagner RC (eds) Introduction to biological membranes. Wiley, Toronto, p 117

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gennis RB (1989) Biomembranes: molecular structure and function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barry BW (1983) Dermatological formulations: percutaneous absorption. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scheuplein RJ (1967) Mechanism of percutaneous absorption. II. Transient diffusion and the relative importance of various routes of skin penetration. J Invest Dermatol 45:334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lieb WR, Stein WD (1986) Non-stokesian nature of transverse diffusion within human red blood cell membranes. J Membr Biol 92:111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatcher ME, Plachy WZ (1993) Dioxygen diffusion in the stratum corneum: an EPR study. Biochim Biophys Acta 1149:73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Packer KJ, Sellwood TC (1978) Proton magnetic resonance studies of hydrated stratum corneum, part 2. Self diffusion. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2:1592

    Google Scholar 

  14. Francoeur ML, Potts RO (1988) The perturbation of stratum corneum lipids affects the diffusive but not partitioning aspects of water vapor permeability. Pharm Res 5:S130

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown S, Diffey BL (1986) The effect of applied thickness on sunscreen protection: in vivo and in vitro studies. Photochem Photobiol 44:509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Flynn GL (1993) General introduction and conceptual differentiation of topical and transdermal drug delivery systems. In: Shaw VP, Maibach HI (eds) Topical drug bioavailability: bioequivalence and penetration. Plenum, New York, p 369

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reifenrath WG (1995) Volatile substances. Cosmet Toil 110:85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rolland A et al (1993) Site-specific drug delivery to pilosebaceous structures using polymeric microspheres. Pharm Res 10:1738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rolland A (1993) Particulate carriers in dermal and transdermal drug delivery: myth or reality. In: Walters KA, Hadgraft J (eds) Pharmaceutical particulate carriers: therapeutic applications. Dekker, New York, p 1983

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schaefer H, Redelmeier TE (1996) Skin barrier principle of percutaneous absorption. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reichert U et al (1993) The cornified envelope: a key structure of terminally differentiating keratinocytes. In: Darmon M, Blumenberg M (eds) The keratinocytes. Academic, San Diego, p 107

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elias PM, Menon GK (1991) Structural and lipid biochemical correlates of the epidermal permeability barrier. Adv Lipid Res 24:1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Madison KC et al (1987) Presence of intact intercellular lipid lamallae in the upper layers of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 88:714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hou SYE et al (1991) Membranes structures in normal and essential fatty acid deficient stratum corneum: characterization by ruthenium tetroxide staining and x-ray diffraction. J Invest Dermatol 96:215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bouwstra JA et al (1991) Structure of human stratum corneum by small-angle x-ray scattering. J Invest Dermatol 97:1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bouwstra JA et al (1992) Structure of human stratum corneum as a function of temperature and hydration: a wide angle x-ray diffraction study. Int J Pharm 84:205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rolland A et al (1993) Site-specific drug delivery to pilose-baceous structures using polymeric microspheres. Pharm Res 10:1738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lademann J et al (2001) Investigation of follicular penetration of topically applied substances. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 14:17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Flynn GL (1990) Physiochemical determinants of skin absorption. In: Gerrity TR, Henry CJ (eds) Principles of route-to-route extrapolation for risk assessment. Elsevier, New York, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tayar EL et al (1991) Percutaneous penetration of drugs: a quantitative structure-permeability relationship study. J Pharm Sci 80:744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kastings GB et al (1987) Effect of lipid sollubility and molecular size on percutaneous absorption. In: Shroot B, Schaefer H (eds) Skin pharmakinetics, vol 1. Karger, Basel, p 138

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guy RH, Potts RO (1992) Structure-permeability relationships in percutaneous absorption. J Pharm Sci 81:603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nemaniac MK, Elias PM (1980) In situ precipitation: a novel cytochemical technique for visualization of permeability pathways in mammalian stratum corneum. J Histol Cytochem 28:573

    Google Scholar 

  34. Squier CA, Lesch CA (1988) Penetration pathways of different compounds through epidermis and oral epithelial. J Oral Pathol 17:512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinnagoda J et al (1990) Guidelines for transepithelial water loss (TEWL) measurements. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Derm 22:164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lavrijsen APM et al (1993) Barrier function parameters in various keratization disorders: transepithelial water loss and vascular response to hexyl nicotinate. Br J Dermatol 129:547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rougier A, Lotte C (1993) Predictive approaches: I. The stripping technique. In: Shaw VP, Maibach HI (eds) Topical drug bioavailability: bioequivalence and penetration. Plenum, New York, p 163

    Google Scholar 

  38. Scheuplein RJ (1967) Mechanism of percutaneous absorption. II. Transient diffusion and the relative importance of various routes of skin penetration. J Invest Dermatol 45:33

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boukhman MP, Maibach HI (2001) Thresholds in contact sensitisation: immunologic mechanisms and experimental evidence in humans — an overview. Food Chem Tox 39:1125–1134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Berard F, Marty JP, Nicolas JF (2003) Allergen penetration through the skin. Eur J Dermatol 13:324–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kao J, Carver MP (1990) Cutaneous metabolism of xenobiotics. Drug Metab Rev 22:363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mukhtar H, Khan WA (1989) Cutaneous cytochrome P-450. Drug Metab Rev 20:657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith CK, Moore CA, Elahi EN, Smart AT, Hotchkiss SA (2000) Human skin absorption and metabolism of the contact allergens, cinnamic aldehyde, and cinnamic alcohol. Toxical Appl Pharmacol 168:189–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bodin A, Li Ping Shao J, Nilsson LG, Karlberg AT (2001) Identification and allergenic activity of hydroxyaldehydes-a new type of oxidation product from an ethoxylated non-ionic surfactant. Contact Dermatitis 44:207–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ryan TJ (1983) Cutaneous circulation. In: Goldsmith LA (eds) Biochemistry and physiology of the skin, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, p 817

    Google Scholar 

  46. Riviere JE, Williams PL (1992) Pharmokinetic implication of changing blood flow in skin. J Pharm Sci 81:601

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Monteiro-Riviere NA et al (1990) Interspecies and interregional analysis of the comparative histological thickness and laser Doppler blood flow measurements af five cutaneous sites in nine species. J Invest Dermatol 95:582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Riviere JE et al (1991) The effect of vasoactive drugs on transdermal lidocaine iontophoresis. J Pharm Sci 80:615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bos JD, Meinardi MMHM (2000) The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol 9:165–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Smith Pease CK, White IR, Basketter DA (2002) Skin as route of exposure to protein allergens. Clin Exp Dermatol 27:296–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhai H, Maibach HI (2001) Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 44:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pedersen LK et al (2004) Augmentation of skin response by exposure to a combination of allergens and irritants — a review. Contact Dermatitis 50:265–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hosoi J et al (2000) Regulation of the cutaneous allergic reaction by humidity. Contact Dermatitis 42:81–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Cross SE, Roberts MS (2000) The effect of occlusion on epidermal penetration of parabens from a commercial allergy test ointment, acetone and ethanol vehicles. J Invest Derm 115:914–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams ML, Elias PM (1993) From basket weave to barrier: unifying concepts for the pathogenesis of the disorders of cornification. Arch Dermatol 129:626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Oestmann E et al (1993) Skin barrier function in healthy volunteers as assessed by transepidermal water loss and vascular response to hexyl nicotinate: intra-and inter-individual variability. Br J Dermatol 128:130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Blichmann CW, Serup J (1989) Reproducibility and variability of transdermal water loss measurements. Acta Derm Venereol 67:206

    Google Scholar 

  58. Imokawa G et al (1991) Decreased levels of ceramides in stratum corneum of atopic dermatitis: an etiologic factor in atopic dry skin? J Invest Dermatol 96:523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Werner Y, Linberg M (1985) Transepidermal water loss in dry and clinically normal skin in patients with atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 65:102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Takenouchi M, Suzuki H, Tagami H (1986) Hydration characteristics of pathological stratum corneum: evaluation of bound water. J Invest Dermatol 87:574–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Werner Y, Linberg M (1985) Transepidermal water loss in dry and clinically normal skin in patients with atopic dermatitis. Acta Derma Venereol 65:102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wilhelm KP et al (1991) Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate-induced skin irritation on in vivo percutaneous absorption of four drugs. J Invest Dermatol 97:927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lavrijsen APM et al (1993) Barrier function parameters in various keratization disorders: transepithelial water loss and vascular response to hexyl nicotinate. Br J Dermatol 129:547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Lavrijsen APM et al (1995) Reduced skin barrier function parallels abnormal stratum corneum lipid organization in patients with lamellar ichtyosis. J Invest Dermatol 105:619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Fartasch M, Schnetz E, Diepgen TL (1998) Characterization of detergent-induced barrier alterations — effect of barrier cream on irritation. J Invest Dermatol 3:121–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wall LM (1980) Nickel penetration through rubber gloves. Contact Dermatitis 6:461–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kalimo K, Lammintausa K, Maki J, Teuho J, Jensen CT (1985) Nickel penetration in allergic individuals: bioavailability versus X-ray microanalysis detection. Contact Dermatitis 12:255–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Fullerton A, Andersen JR, Hoelgaard A (1988) Permeation of nickel through human skin in vitro-effect of vehicles. Br J Dermatol 118:509–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Fullerton A, Andersen JR, Hoelgaard A, Menne T (1986) Permeation of nickel salts through human skin in vitro. Contact Dermatitis 15:173–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Sherertz EF, Sloan KB (1988) Percutaneous penetration of squaric acid and its esters in hairless mouse and human skin in vitro. Arch Dermatol Res 280:57–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Surber C, Itin P, Buchner S, Maibach HI (1992) Effect of a new topical cyclosporin formulation on human allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 26:116–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Loden M (1986) The effect of 4 barrier creams on the absorption of water, benzene, and formaldehyde into excised human skin. Contact Dermatitis 14:292–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Boman A, Mellstrom G (1989) Percutaneous absorption of 3 organic solvents in the guinea pig. (III). Effect of barrier cream. Contact Dermatitis 21:134–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Frosch PJ, Kurte A (1994) Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 31:161–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhai H, Maibach HI (1996) Effect of barrier creams: human skin in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 35:92–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhai H, Maibach HI (1996) Percutaneous penetration (dermatopharmcokinetics) in evaluating barrier creams. Curr Prob Dermatol 25:193–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Gawkrodger DJ, Healy J, Howe AM (1995) The prevention of nickel contact dermatitis. A review of the use of binding agents and barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 32:257–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Blumenweg 8, 12105, Berlin, Germany

    Hans Schaefer & Thomas E. Redelmeier

Authors
  1. Hans Schaefer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas E. Redelmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Hautklinik Lehrstuhl Dermatologie der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Beurhausstr. 40, 44137, Dortmund, Germany

    Peter J. Frosch (Professor) (Professor)

  2. Dermatologisk afdeling K, Amtssygehuset Gentofte, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark

    Torkil Menné (Professor Dr.) (Professor Dr.)

  3. Laboratoire de Dermato-Chimie Clinique Dermatologique, CHU, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France

    Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin (Professor) (Professor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaefer, H., Redelmeier, T.E. (2006). Skin Penetration. In: Frosch, P.J., Menné, T., Lepoittevin, JP. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24471-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31301-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation