Advertisement

Gender

  • Kaija H. Lammintausta

Keywords

Atopic Dermatitis Contact Dermatitis Hand Eczema Acta Derm Irritant Contact Dermatitis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrup G. Hand eczema and other hand dermatoses in South Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol 1969; 49:61Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lantinga H, Nater JP, Coenraads JP. Prevalence, incidence and course of eczema on the hands and forearms in a sample of the general population. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 10:135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    city. Disseration. University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden, 1990Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryld LE, Kyvik KO, Brönsted L, Hindsberger C, Agner T, Menne T. Hand eczema in twins: a questionnaire investigation. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fregert S, Hjorth N, Magnusson B, Bandmann H-J, Calnan CD, Cronin E, Malten K, Meneghini CL, Pirilä V, Wilkinson DS. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc 1969; 55:17–35Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goon AT, Goh CL. Epidemiology of occupational skin disease in Singapore 1989–1998. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 43:133–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rivett J, Merrick C. Prevalence of occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 22:304–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Majorie JML, Blomberg BME, Bruynzeel DP. Dvelopment of hand eczema in junior hairdressers: an 8-year follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conde-Salazaar L, Baz M, Guimaraens D, Cannavo A. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: patch test results in 379 hairdressers (1980–93) Am J Cont Derm 1995; 6:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hansen KS. Occupational dermatoses in hospital cleaning women. Contact Dermatitis 1983; 9:343–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tacke J, Schmidt A, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL. Occupational contact dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and cooks. Contact Dermatitis 1983; 9:343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nilsson E. Individual and environmental risk factors for hand eczema in hospital workers. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 1986; 128:1–63Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lammintausta K, Kalimo K. Atopy and hand dermatitis in hospital wet work. Contact Dermatitis 1981, 7:301–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P. Occupational hand dermatitis in hospital environments. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33:172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nielsen J. The occurrence and course of skin symptoms on the hands among female cleaners. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34:284–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nilsson E, Mikaelsson B, Andersson S. Atopy, occupation and domestic work as risk factors for hand eczema in hospital workers. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13:216–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meding B, Barregård L, Marcus K. Hand eczema in car mechanics. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30:129–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coenraads PJ, Nater JP, Jansen HA, Lantinga H. Prevalence of eczema and other dermatoses of the hands and forearms in construction workers in the Netherlands. Clin Exp Dermatol 1984; 9:149–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goh CL, Gan SL, Ngui SJ. Occupational dermatitis in a prefabrication construction factory. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 15:235–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Elsner P. Hand eczema in metalworker trainees-an analysis of risk factors. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 43:327–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lyon CC, Smith AJ, Griffiths CE, Beck MH. The spectrum of skin disorders in abdominal stoma patients. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143:1248–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hellman J, Lago CP. Dermatologic complications in colostomy and ileostomy patients. Int J Dermatol 1990; 29:129–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Munson KA, Bare DE, Hoath SB. Development of diaper rash in the newborn. Pediatr Dermatol 2000; 17:52–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schultz-Larsen F. Atopic dermatitis: a genetic-epidemiologic study in a population-based twin sample. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28:719–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lichtenstein P, Svartengren M. Genes, environments and sex: factors of importance in atopic diseases in 7-9 year old Swedish twins. Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 52:1079–1086Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moritz CG, Mauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and hand and contact dermatitis in adolescents. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis. Brit J Dermatol 2001; 144:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yngveson M, Svensson A, Johansson A, Isacsson A. Hand dermatosis in upper secondary school pupils: 2-year comparison and follow-up, Br J Dermatol 2000; 142:485–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dotterud LK, Falk ES. Contact allergy in relation to hand eczema in atopic diseases in north Norwegian schoolchildren. Acta Pediatr 1995; 84:402–406Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Christensen OB. Nickel allergy and hand eczema in females. Dissertation, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden, 1982Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ednman B. Sites of contact dermatitis in relationship to particular allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Banfeld CC, Basketter DA, Powell SM. Cutaneous reactivity of the hands in nickel-sensitive patients with hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38:316–318Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nielsen NH, Menne T, Kristiansen J, Christensen JM, Borg L, Poulsen LK. Effects of repeated skin exposure to low nickel concentrations: a model for allergic contact dermatitis to nickel in the hands. Brit J Dermatol 1999; 141:676–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Elsner P, Burg G. Irritant reactivity is a better risk marker for nickel sensitization than atopy. Acta Derm Venereol 1993; 73:214–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Palacio S, Schmitt D, Viac J. Contact allergens and sodium lauryl sulphate upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor in normal keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:540–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wakem P, Burns RP Jr, Ramirez F, Zlotnick D, Ferbel B, Haidaris CG, Gaspari AA. Allergens and irritants transcriptionally upregulate CD80 gene expression in human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 114:1085–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Larsson-Stymme B, Widström L. Ear-piercing: a cause of nickel-allergy in schoolgirls? Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mattila L, Kilpeläinen M, Terho EO, Koskenvuo M, Helenius H, Kalimo K. Prevalence of nickel allergy among Finnish university students in 1995. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44:218–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vine MF, Stein L, Weigle K. Gender differences in response to the multitest CMI skin test in the general population. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000; 84:445–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Agner T. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. Acta Derm Venereol 1992; 173:1–26Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eisenbeiss C, Wlzel J, Schmeller W. The influence of female sex hormones on skin thickness: evaluation using 20-MHz sonography. Brit J Dermatol 1998; 139:462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Wilson D. Irritant reactivity in males and females. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 17:276–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kjaergaard S, Pedersen OF, Molhave L. Sensitivity of the eyes to airborne irritant stimuli: influence of individual characteristics. Arch Environ Health 1992; 47:45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Magerl W, Westerman RA, Mohner B, Handwerker HO. Properties of transdermal histamine iontophoresis: differential effects of season, gender and body region. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 94:347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gonzalez RR, Blanchard LA. Thermoregulatory responses to cold transients: effects of menstrual cycle in resting women. J Appl Physiol 1998; 85:543–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stern UM, Hornstein OP, Salzer B. Do training-dependent differences in perspiration exist between healthy and atopic subjects? J Dermatol 2000; 27:491–499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zackheim HS. Effect of prolonged administration of testosterone on the epidermis of female rats. J Invest Dermatol 1968; 50:401–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tammi R, Santti R. Morphometric analysis of human epidermis treated with testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone in organ culture. Arch Dermatol Res 1989; 281:417–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Williams M, Hanley K, Elias P, Feingold K. Ontogeny of the epidermal permeability barrier. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc 1998; 3:75–79Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hanley K, Rassner U, Jiang Y et al. Hormonal basis of the gender difference in epidermal barrier formation in the fetal rat. Acceleration by estrogen and delay by testosterone. J Clin Invest 1996; 97:2576–2584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kao J, Garg A, Mao-Qiang M, Crumrine D, Ghadially R, Feingold K, Elias P. Testosterone perturbs epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 116:443–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaija H. Lammintausta
    • 1
  1. 1.Turku University Central HospitalTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations