4 Conclusions
The main purpose of the present study was to test the reliability and sensitivity of mechanical data obtained from human cervices with respect to a possible clinical application for diagnostic purposes. Future studies will be performed with the goal of using the proposed method for the detection of early cervical changes associated with pathologic conditions.
The investigation of the mechanical behavior of the human uterine cervices was based on the use of an aspiration device. Intra-operative in vivo measurements were performed on eight organs without delaying the surgical procedure. The quality of the in vivo data is comparable with that obtained ex vivo, and with the experience of previous ex vivo bench top applications of the aspiration device.
A comparison of measurements of the same organ in vivo and ex vivo has shown that: (i) the ex vivo mechanical response of the uterine cervix tissue, measured approximately 1.5 hours after extraction, did not differ considerably from that observed in vivo; (ii) a stronger history dependence in tissue pre-conditioning was identified in the ex vivo situation when compared with in vivo; (iii) the differences in the time dependence of the mechanical response (parameters δ and τ) were not significant and might be masked by the variability of the measured data.
Our preliminary data indicate that the proposed stiffness parameter η can be used for the characterization of human uterine cervices since the experimental procedure enables detection of changes of 30% with respect to a reference stiffness value.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aoki, T., Ohashi, T., Matsumoto, T., and Sato, M. (1997). The pipette aspiration applied to the local stiffness measurement of soft tissues. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 25:581–587.
Bishop, E. H. (1964). Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet. Gynecol. 24:266–268.
Brown, J. D., Rosen, J., Kim, Y. S., Chang, L., Sinananand, M., and Hannaford, B. (2003). In-vivo and in-situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues. In Westwood, J. D., Hoffman, H. M., Mogel, G. T., Phillips, R., Robb, R. A., and Stredney, D., eds., Medicine Meets Virtual Reality11, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, volume 94, 26–32.
Carter, F. J., Frank, T. G., Davies, P. J., McLean, D., and Cuschieri, A. (2001). Measurement and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs. Med. Image Anal. 5:231–236.
Fung, Y. C. (1993). Biomechanics. Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition.
Gefen, A., and Margulies, S. S. (2004). Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? J. Biomech. 37:1339–1352.
Hendriks, F. M., Brokken, D., van Eemeren, J., Oomens, C. W. J., Baaijens, F. P. T., and Horsten, J. B. A. M. (2004). A numerical-experimental method to characterize the non-linear mechanical behaviour of human skin. Skin Res. Technol. 9:274–283.
Holzapfel, G. A., and Ogden, R. W., eds. (2003). Biomechanics of Soft Tissue in Cardiovascular Systems. Wien — New York: Springer-Verlag.
Humphrey, J. D. (2002). Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics. Cells, Tissues, and Organs. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kauer, M., Vuskovic, V., Dual, J., Szekely, G., and Bajka, M. (2002). Inverse finite element characterization of soft tissues. Med. Image Anal. 6:275–287.
Manduca, A., Oliphant, T. E., Dresner, M. A., Mahowald, J. L., Kruse, S. A., Amromin, E., Felmlee, J. P., Greenleaf, J. F., and Ehman, R. L. (2001). Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med. Image Anal. 5:237–254.
Mazza, E., Nava, A., Bauer, M., Winter, R., Bajka, M., and Holzapfel, G. A. (2005). Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med. Image Anal. in press.
Miller, K., Chinzei, K., Orssengo, G., and Bednarz, P. (2000). Mechanical properties of brain tissue in vivo: experiment and computer simulation. J. Biomech. 33:1369–1376.
Nasseri, S., Bilston, L. E., and Phan-Thien, N. (2002). Viscoelastic properties of pig kidney in shear, experimental results and modeling. Rheol. Acta 41:180–192.
Nava, A., Mazza, E., Häfner, O., and Bajka, M. (2004a). Experimental observation and modelling of preconditioning in soft biological tissues. In Metaxas, D., and Cotin, S., eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3078, 1–8.
Nava, A., Mazza, E., Kleinermann, F., Avis, N. J., McClure, J., and Bajka, M. (2004b). Evaluation of the mechanical properties of human liver and kidney through aspiration experiments. Technol. Health Care 12:269–280.
Ophir, J., Cespedes, I., Ponnekanti, H., Yazdi, Y., and Li, X. (1991). Elastography-a quantitative method for imaging elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason. Imaging 13:111–134.
Ottensmeyer, M. P. (2002). TeMPeST I-D: An instrument for measuring solid organ soft tissue properties. Exp. Techn. 26:48–50.
Rechberger, T., Uldbjerg, N., and Oxlund, H. (1988). Connective tissue changes in the cervix during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by cervical incompetence. Obstet. Gynecol. 71:563–567.
Tonuk, E., and Silver-Thorn, M. B. (2004). Nonlinear viscoelastic material property estimation of lower extremity residual limb tissues. J. Biomech. Eng. 126:289–300.
Vuskovic, V. (2001). Device for in vivo measurement of mechanical properties of internal human soft tissues. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich. No. 14222.
Zheng, Y., and Mak, A. F. T. (1996). An ultrasound indentation system for biomechanical properties assessment of soft tissues in vivo. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43:912–918.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mazza, E., Nava, A., Bauer, M., Winter, R., Bajka, M., Holzapfel, G.A. (2006). In Vivo Experiments to Characterize the Mechanical Behavior of the Human Uterine Cervix. In: Holzapfel, G.A., Ogden, R.W. (eds) Mechanics of Biological Tissue. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31184-X_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31184-X_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25194-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31184-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)