Skip to main content

Cervix uteri

  • Chapter
Die Gynäkologie
  • 2172 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bevölkerungsbezogener Krebsregister in Deutschland (1997) Krebs in Deutschland, Häufigkeiten und Trends. Statistisches Landesamt Saarland

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie AGO (1998) Diagnostische und therapeutische Standards beim Cervixkarzinom. Frauenarzt 7: 1043–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Belhocine T, Thille A, Fridman V et al. (2002) Contribution of whole-body 18FDG PET imagining in the management of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 87: 90–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brinton LA, Hoover RN (1997) Epidemiology of gynecologic cancers. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (eds) Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven: 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley SL, Tritz DM, van Le L et al. (1996) Lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynec Oncol 63: 4–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt E, Östör A, Fox H (1997) Editorial: The new FIGO definition of cervical cancer stage IA: a critique. Gynecol Oncol 65: 1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft. www.Krebsgesellschaft.de

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn T, Burke M, Shwayder J (2003) A „see and treat“ management for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion pap smears. J Lower Gen Tract Dis 7: 104–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn TS, Killoran K, Wolf D (2004) Complications of outpatient LLETZ procedures. J Reprod Med 49: 76–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AC, Berschuck A (1997) Tumormarkers. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (eds) Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven: 177–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara H, Tortolero-Luna G, Mitchell MF, Koulos JP, Wright TC (1997) Adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Expression and clinical significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors. Cancer 79: 505–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green et al. (2001) Cochrane Database. Syst Rev (4): CD 00 2225

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich J (1998) Leitlinien der AG Cervixpathologie und Kolposkopie, Sektion der DGGG: Intraepitheliale Neoplasien und frühinvasive Karzinome des unteren Genitaltraktes der Frau (Cervix uteri, Vulva, Vagina). Zentralbl Gynäkol 120: 200–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel H, Kohler C, Michels W et al. (2003) Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy: prospective Evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 90: 505–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgarth M (1998) Münchner Nomenklatur II für die gynäkologische Zytodiagnostik. Frauenarzt 3: 392–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Höckel M, Knapstein PG (1996) Uterine cervix in multimodality therapy. In: Sevin BK, Kapstein PG, Köchli OR (eds) Gynecologic oncology. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme: 82–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang DM, Lickrish GM, Chapman W et al. (2004) Long-term surveillance is required for all women treated for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 8: 125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N, Khalili M, Hirschowitz L et al. (2003) Predicting residual disease after excision of cervical dysplasia. BJOG 110: 952–955

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landoni F, Maneo A, Maggioni A, Milani R, Cormio G, Mangioni C (1997) Randomized study comparing class II and class III radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 7 (Boston), Suppl 2: 3 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine L, Lucci JA III, Dinh TV (2003) Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda terminology and management guidelines. Obstetr Gynecol Surv 58(6): 399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link M (1998) Die Früherkennung des Cervixkarzinoms. Gynäkologe 29: 755–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Look K, Brunetto VL, Clarke-Pearson DL, Averette HE, Major FJ, Alvarez RD, Homesley HD, Zaino RJ (1996) An analysis of cell type in patients with surgically stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 63: 304–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massad SL, Collins YC (2003) Using history and colposcopy to select women for endocervical curettage: results from 2,287 cases. J Reprod Med 48: 1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meigs JV (1945) The Wertheim operation for carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 49: 542–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Meigs JV, Parsons L, Nathanson IT (1949) Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in cancer of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 57: 1087–1097

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute Workshop (1989) The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/Vaginal cytological diagnoses. JAMA 262: 931–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland (eds) (2003) Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188: 1383–1392

    Google Scholar 

  • anoskaltsis T, James, Thomas E et al. (2004) Needle versus loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized, controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 190: 748–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF (1941) The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gyn 42: 193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Park TW, Richart RM, Sun XW, Wright TC (1996) Association between human papillomavirus type and clonal status of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 355–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker MF, Zahn CM, Vogel KM et al. (2002) Discrepancy in the interpretation of cervical histology by gynecologic pathologists. Obstet Gynecol 100: 277–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters WA, Lin PY, Barrett RJ, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, Souharni L, Grigsby P, Gordon W Jr, Alberts DS (2000) Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 8: 1606–1613

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry K-U, Menton S, Menton M, van Loenen-Frosch F, de Carvalho Gomes H, Holz B, Schopp B, Garbreht-Butter S, Davies P, Boemer G, van den Akker E, Iftner T (2003) Inclusion of HPV testing in routine cervical cancer screening for women above 29 years in ermany: results for 8 466 patients. Br J Cancer 88: 1570–1577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richart RM (1997) Cervical cancer precursers and their management. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD (eds) Te Linde’s operative gynecology. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven: 1385–1412

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock JA, Thompson JD (1997) Te Linde’s operative gynecology. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W et al. (2004) Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 291: 2100–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaya GF, McConnell KJ, Kulasingam SL (2003) Risk of cervical cancer associated with extending the interval between cervical-cancer screenings. N Engl J Med 349: 1501–1509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schauta F (1911) Die erweiterte vaginale Operation bei Carcinoma colli uteri aufgrund zehnjähriger Erfahrung. Monatsschr Geburtsh 33: 680–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman MH, Brinton LA, Devesa SS, Fraumeni JF (1996) Cervical cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraimeni JF (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1090–1116

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw E, Sellors J, Kaczorowski J (2003) Prospective Evaluation of colposcopic features in predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: degree of acetowhite change most important. J Low Gen Tract Dis 7: 6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman ME, Lorincz AT, Scott DR et al. (2003) Baseline cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and risk for cervical neoplasia: a 10-year cohort analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Hoyer H, Lotz B, Leistritza S, Kühne-Heid r, Nindl I, Müller B, Haerting J, Dürst M (2000) Screening for High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy. Int J Cancer (Pred Oncol) 89: 529–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shingleton HM, Thompson JD (1997) Cancer of the cervix. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD (eds) Te Linde’s operative gynecology. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven: 1413–1499

    Google Scholar 

  • Skimmer EN, Gehrig PA, van Le L (2004) High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: abbreviating posttreatment surveillance. Obstet Gynecol 103: 488–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman FB, Perez CA, Kurman RJ, Thigpen JT (1997) Uterine cervix. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (eds) Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven: 785–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell S, Houdmont M, Paterson MEL (1997) Ovarian fundion after radical hysterectomy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 7: 46–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tavitz et al. zz (2992) zz zz

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim E (1900) Zur Frage der Operation beim Uteruskrebs. Arch Gynäkol 61: 627–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright TC, Richard RM (1997) Pathogenesis and diagnosis of preinvasive lesions of the lower genital tract. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (eds) Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott-Raven: 675–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Wun T, Law L, Harvey D et al. (2003) Increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis in patients with cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy, radiation, and erythropoietin. Cancer 98: 1514–1520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yessaian A, Magistris A, Burger RA, Monk BJ (2004) Radical hysterectomy followed by tailored postoperative therapy in the treatment of stage IB2 cervical cancer: feasibility and indications for adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol 94: 61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski GD, Bais AG, Helmerhorst TJ et al. (2004) HPV testing and monitoring of women after treatment of cin 3: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Obstetr Gynecol Surv 59(7): 543–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oettling, G., Kreienberg, R. (2006). Cervix uteri. In: Kaufmann, M., Costa, S.D., Scharl, A. (eds) Die Gynäkologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31105-X_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31105-X_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25664-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31105-8

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics