Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technique

  • Chapter
MR Cholangiopancreatography

  • 808 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Fayad LM, Kowalski T, Mitchell DG (2003) MR cholangiopancreatography: evaluation of common pancreatic diseases. Radiol Clin North Am 41: 97–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher AS, Turner MA (2002) MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiol Clin North Am 40: 1363–1376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hundt W, Petsch R, Scheidler J et al. (2002) Clinical evaluation of further-developed MRCP sequences in comparison with standard MRCP sequences. Eur Radiol 12: 1768–1777

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K et al. (2000) Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes — value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 214: 173–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez Hanninen E, Amthauer H, Hosten N et al. (2002) Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Radiology 224: 34–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ly JN, Miller FH (2002) MR imaging of the pancreas: a practical approach. Radiol Clin North Am 40: 1289–1306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoe L, Mermuys K, Vanhoenacker P (2004) MRCP pitfalls. Abdom Imaging 29: 360–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, McEntee G et al. (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparison of single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences. Clin Radiol 55: 866–873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer B, Grässner J, Hausman R (1994) Image acquisition in a second with half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo. J Magn Reson Imaging (P) Suppl: 86–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A et al. (2000) Pancreaticobiliaryductal system: value of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiopancreatography for postoperative evaluation. Radiology 215: 81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Epps K, Regan F (1999) MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE sequences. Clin Radiol 54: 588–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoe L, Bosmans H, Aerts P, Baert AL, Fevery J, Kiefer B, Marchal G (1996) Focal liver lesions: fast T2-weighted MR imaging with half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement. Radiology 201: 817–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK, et al. (2002) Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 409–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Bosmans H, Gryspeerdt S, Van Hoe L, Van Oostende S, De Jaegere T, Kiefer B, Baert AL, Marchal G (1997a) Preliminary experience with a new double echo half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo acquisition in the characterisation of liver lesions. MAGMA 5: 79–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosmans H, Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Kiefer B, Van Steenbergen W, Baert AL, Marchal G (1997b) Technical note. Single-shot T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper abdomen: preliminary experience with the double echo HASTE technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 1291–1293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pawluk RS, Borrello JA, Brown JJ, McFarland EG, Mirowitz SA, Tsao LY (2000) A prospective assessment of breath-hold fast spin echo and inversion recovery fast spin echo techniques for detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 18: 543–551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Bosmans H, Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S et al. (1997) Technical note. Single-shot T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper abdomen: preliminary experience with the double echo HASTE technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 1291–1293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu DS, Saini S, Hahn PF et al. (1994) T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen: should fat suppression be used routinely? AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1095–1100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Laubenberger J, Büchert M, Schneider B, Blum B, Hennig J, Langer M (1995) Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 33: 18–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matos C, Metens T, Devière J et al. (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203: 435–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keogan MT, Edelman RR (2001) Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 220: 310–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoe L, Mermuys K, Vanhoenacker P (2004) MRCP pitfalls. Abdom Imaging 29: 360–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Laubenberger J, Büchert M, Schneider B, Blum B, Hennig J, Langer M (1995) Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 33: 18–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matos C, Metens T, Devière J et al. (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203: 435–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoe L, Mermuys K, Vanhoenacker P (2004) MRCP pitfalls. Abdom Imaging 29: 360–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

References

  • Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferruci JT (1995) MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacity of a three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165: 295–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T et al. (1992) Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 183: 578–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold C, Bret P (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography. Abdom Imaging 21: 105–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Haase A (1990) Snapshot FLASH MRI. Applications to T1,T2 and chemical shift imaging. Magn Reson Med 13: 77–89

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger-Bampton AE, Riederer SJ, Campeau NG, Ehman RL, Johnson CD (1991) T1-weighted snapshot gradient-echo MR imaging of the abdomen. Radiology 181: 25–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keogan MT, Edelman RR (2001) Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 220: 310–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Keogan MT, Edelman RR (2001) Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 220: 310–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semelka SR, Asher SM (1993) MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiology 188: 593–602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rofsky, NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. (1999) Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 212: 876–884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Laubenberger J, Büchert M, Schneider B, Blum B, Hennig J, Langer M (1995) Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 33: 18–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Vanbeckevoort D et al. (1998) Normal Vaterian sphincter complex: evaluation of morphology and contractility with dynamic single-shot MR cholangiography. AJR 170: 1497–1500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Bosmans H, Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Kiefer B, Van Steenbergen W, Baert AL, Marchal G (1997) Technical note. Single-shot T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper abdomen: preliminary experience with the double echo HASTE technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 1291–1293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laubenberger J, Büchert M, Schneider B, Blum B, Hennig J, Langer M (1995) Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 33: 18–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A (1996) Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single-shot MR cholangiography versus intravenous cholangiography. Radiology 198: 561–566

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Vanbeckevoort D et al. (1998) Normal Vaterian sphincter complex: evaluation of morphology and contractility with dynamic single-shot MR cholangiography. AJR 170: 1497–1500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Chan JH, Tsui EY, Yuen MK et al. (2000) Gadopentetate dimeglumine as an oral negative gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRCP. Abdom Imaging 25: 405–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geitung JT, Gjesdal KI (1997) Dynamic imaging of the gastric ventricle using MRI. MAGMA 5[Suppl]: 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos C, Metens T, Devière J et al. (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203: 435–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A, Maris T et al. (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography before and after oral blueberry juice administration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24: 229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M et al. (1994) Small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement. Radiology 193: 683–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm B, Mahfouz A-E, Taupitz M et al. (1997) Liver metastases: improved detection with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging? Radiology 202: 677–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanematsu M, Shiratori Y, Hoshi H, et al. (2000) Pancreas and peripancreatic vessels: effect of imaging delay on gadolinium enhancement at dynamic gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging. Radiology 215: 95–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rofsky, NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. (1999) Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 212: 876–884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC (1997) Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and an MR power injector. Radiology 202: 268–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaa J, Wendl K, Trede M, Georgi M (1997) New concepts in MR imaging of pancreatic carcinoma: the all-in-one approach. In: Oudkerk M, Edelman R (eds) High-power gradient MR-imaging. Blackwell Science, Berlin, pp 425–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogan MT, Edelman RR (2001) Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 220: 310–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, Chenevert TL, Williams DM, Marx MV, Cho KJ (1995) Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197: 785–792

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rofsky, NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. (1999) Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 212: 876–884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Fayad LM, Kamel IR, Mitchell DG, Bluemke DA (2005) Functional MR cholangiography: diagnosis of functional abnormalities of the gallbladder and biliary tree. Am. J. Roentgenol 184: 1563–1571

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl HB, Vorwerk D, Klose KC, Guenther RW (1991) Pancreatic enhancement after low-dose infusion of Mn-DPDP. Radiology 180: 337–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kettritz U, Warshauer D, Brown E, Schlund J, Eisenberg L, Semelka R (1996) Enhancement of the normal pancreas: comparison of manganese-DPDP and gadolinium chelate. Eur Radiol 6: 14–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beers B, Gallez B, Pringot J (1997) Contrastenhanced MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 203: 297–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK, et al. (2002) Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 409–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Anzai Y, Blackwell KE, Hirschowitz SL et al. (1994) Initial clinical experience with dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. Radiology 192: 709–715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers JM, Lewis J, Josephson L (1994) Visualization of superior mesenteric lymph nodes by the combined oral and intravenous administration of the ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide AMI 227. Magn Reson Imaging 12: 1161–1165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senéterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y et al. (1996) Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 200: 785–792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogl TJ, Hammerstingl R, Schwarz W et al. (1996) Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced versus gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Radiology 198: 881–887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Czako L, Endes J, Takacs T et al. (2001) Evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function by secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Pancreas 23: 323–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darweesh R, Dodds W, Hogan W et al. (1988) Efficacy of quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy and fatty-meal sonography for evaluating patients with suspected partial common duct obstruction. Gastroenterology 94: 779–786

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoki T, Hasuike Y, Takeda Y et al. (2004) Visualization of pancreaticobiliary reflux in anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction by secretin-stimulated dynamic magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Acta Radiol 45: 375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellerhoff KJ, Helmberger H, Rösch T, et al. (2002) Dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin administration: image quality and diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 121–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy S, Krishnamurthy G (1996) Cholecystokin and morphine pharmacological intervention during 99mTc-HIDA cholescintigraphy: a rational approach. Semin Nucl Med 26: 16–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matos C, Metens T, Devière J et al. (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203: 435–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Chopra K, Westaby D, Murray-Lyon I (1996) Why use buscopan during diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy? Gut 38: 473

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forssmann K, Singer MV (1994) Akute Cholezystitis — konservative Therapie. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 83: 877–879

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Dalal PU, Howlett DC, Sallomi DF et al. (2004) Does intravenous glucagon improve common bile duct visualisation during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Results in 42 patients. Eur J Radiol 49: 258–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferruci J, Wittenberg J, Stone L, Dreyfuss J (1976) Hypotonic cholangiography with glucagon. Radiology 118: 466–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Staritz M (1988) Pharmacology of the sphincter of Oddi. Endoscopy 20: 171–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Cotton P, Chong W. Complications of ERCP and therapy. In: Silvis S, Rohrmann C, Ansel H (eds) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Igaku-Shoin, New York, pp 446–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SI et al. (2002) Using kinematic MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate biliary dilatation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 178: 909–914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold C, Bret PM (1996) Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 1285–1295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferruci JT (1996) MR cholangiography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 199: 91–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  • Reinhold C, Bret PM (1996) Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 1285–1295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoe L, Mermuys K, Vanhoenacker P (2004) MRCP pitfalls. Abdom Imaging 29: 360–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Guibaud L, Bret P, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AL (1995) Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 197: 109–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Conner HJ, Hamilton I, Ellis WR, Watters J, Lintott DJ, Axon AT (1986) Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gastrointest Radiol 11: 161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch T, Lightdale CJ, Botet JF et al. (1992) Localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 326: 1721–1726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbey AL, Lee MJ, Brugge WR, Mueller PR (1996) Endoscopic sonography of the upper gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 45–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Cahir JG, Freeman AH, Courtney HM (2004) Multislice CT of the abdomen. Br J Radiol 77 Spec No 1: S64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J et al. (1997) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 202: 655–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Molina PL, Sharp TJ, Calvo B (1996) Pancreatic masses with inconclusive findings on spiral CT: is there a role for MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 6: 585–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Technique. In: MR Cholangiopancreatography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30971-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30971-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22269-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30971-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation