Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 184:786–792
Bromer MQ, Weinberg DS (2005) Screening for colorectal cancer — now and the near future. Semin Oncol 32:3–10
Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG et al. (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation feasibility study. Radiology 219:693–698
Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1713–1719
Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. Am J Roentgenol 1711:989–995
FDA (2001) Science backgrounder: safety of sodium oral phosphates oral solution. www.fda.gov/cder/drug/safety/sodiumphosphate.htm
Fenlon HM (2002) CT colonography: pitfalls and interpretation. Abdom Imaging 27:284–291
Fenlon HM, Nunes DP et al. (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. NEJM 341:1496–1502
Ferrucci J (2005a) CT colonography for detection of colon polyps and cancer. Working group on CT colongraphy. Lancet. 365:1464–1465; author reply 1465–1466
Ferrucci JT (2005b) Colonoscopy: virtual and optical — another look, another view. Radiology 235:13–16
Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M et al. (2005) CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 15:1192–1202
Hinshaw JL, Taylor AJ, Jones DA (2005) Prospective blind trial comparing 45-ml and 90-ml doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation prior to CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 184(s):20
Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300–1311
Johnson CD, Dachman AH (2000) CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 216:331–341
Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR et al. (1993) A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 88:1218–1223
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S (2005) Fast reading of CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 184(s):21
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al. (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results — polyp detection and patient compliance. Radiology 224:393–403
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M et al. (2004) A method to perform laxative-free CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 183:945–948
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J et al. (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. Am J Roentgenol 184:1836–1842
Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. Am J Roentgenol 176:137–143
Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218:274–277
Macleod AJ, Duncan KA, Pearson RH et al. (1998) A comparison of Fleet Phospho-soda with Picolax in the preparation of the colon for double contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 53:612–614
Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB et al. (1999) Virtual colonoscopy: a kinder, gentler colorectal cancer screening test? Lancet 354:1048–1049
Murphy J, Coster G (1997) Issues in patient compliance. Drugs 54:797–800
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 181:799–805
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200
Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ et al. (2003) Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:304–310
Rex DK (2000) Virtual colonoscopy: time for some tough questions for radiologists and gastroenterologists. Endoscopy 32:260–263
Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V et al. (2003a) Optimizing colonic distention for multi-row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229:99–108
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V et al. (2003b) Optimizing bowel preparation for multidetector row CT colonography: effect of Citramag and Picolax. Clin Radiol 58:723–732
Thomeer M, Carbone I, Bosmans H et al. (2003) Stool tagging applied in thin-slice multidetector computed tomography colonography. JCAT 27:132–139
Toledo TK, DiPalma JA (2001) Review article: colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15:605–611
van Dam J, Cotton P, Johnson CD et al. (2004) AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 127:970–984
Vanner SJ, McDonald PH, Paterson WG et al. (1990) A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 85:422–427
Zalis ME, Hahn PF (2001) Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 176(3):646–648
Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C et al. (2003) CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction — initial observations. Radiology 226:911–917
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lefere, P., Gryspeerdt, S. (2006). The Alternative: Faecal Tagging. In: Lefere, P., Gryspeerdt, S. (eds) Virtual Colonoscopy. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22865-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30904-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)