Keywords
- Adenomatous Polyp
- Compute Tomographic Colonography
- Colorectal Cancer Screening
- Conventional Colonoscopy
- Virtual Colonoscopy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahsan H, Neugut A, Garbowshi G et al. (1998) Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps and increased risk for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 128:900–905
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (1998) The role of colonoscopy in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc 48:689–690
Anderson W, Guyton K, Hiatt R et al. (2002) Colorectal cancer screening for persons at average risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1126–1133
Barish M (2004) Billing and reimbursement of virtual colonoscopy. Fifth Annual Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy, Boston, USA
Biancone L, Fiori R, Tosti C et al. (2003) Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for stricturing postoperative recurrences in Crohn’s disease. Inflammatory Bowel Dis 9:343–350
Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C et al. (2004) Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 127:452–456
Bruzzi J, Moss A, Fenlon H. (2001) Clinical results of CT colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 11:2188–2194
Chen S, Lu D, Hecht J, et al. (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. Am J Roentgenol 172:595–599
Dachman A, Kuniyoshi J, Boyle C et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. Am J Roentgenol 171:989–995
Desch C, Benson A, Smith T et al. (1999) Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 17:1312
Fenlon H, McAneny D, Nunes D et al. (1999a) Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 210:423–428
Fenlon H, Nunes D, Schroy P et al. (1999b) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496–1503
Frazier A, Lindsay M, Graham A et al. (2000) Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 284:1954–1961
Fukutomi Y, Moriwaki H, Nagase S et al. (2002) Metachronous colon tumors: risk factor and rationale for the surveillance colonoscopy after initial polypectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 128:569–574
Garbay J, Suc B, Rotman N et al. (1996) Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy. Br J Surg 83:42–44
Gollub M, Ginsberg M, Cooper C et al. (2002) Quality of virtual colonoscopy in patients who have undergone radiation therapy or surgery: how successful are we? Am J Roentgenol 178:1109–1116
Gryspeerdt S, Herman M, Baekelandt M, et al. (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:768–777
Huda W, Stone RM (2003) Review of radiologic physics, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al. (2003) Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 229:775–781
Johnson C, MacCarty R, Welch T et al. (2004) Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for the screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:314–321
Kusama T, Ota K (2002) Radiological protection for diagnostic examination of pregnant women. Congenital Anomalies 42:10–14
Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Bria E et al. (2003) Contrastenhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 13:883–889
Leaper M, Johnston MJ, Barclar M et al. (2004) Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy. Endoscopy 36:499–503
Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Dewyspelaere J et al. (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393–403
Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M et al. (1999) Usefulness of CT colography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR 173:561–564
Macari M, Bini E, Xue X et al. (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multidetector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224:383–392
Morrin M, Farrell R, Kruskal J et al. (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771
Mpofu C, Watson A, Rhodes J (2004) Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000279
O’Brien M, Winawer S, Zauber A et al. (1990) The national polyp study. patient and polyp characteristics associated with high grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 88:371–379
Ota Y, Matsui T, Ono H et al. (2003) Value of virtual computed tomographic colonography for Crohn’s colitis: comparison with endoscopy and barium enema. Abdom Imaging 28:778–783
Pickhardt P, Choi J, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200
Rankin GB. (1987) Indications, contraindications, and complications of colonoscopy. In: Sivak MV (ed). Gastrointestinal endoscopy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 873–878
Rex D, Cutler C, Lemmel G et al. (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28
Rozen P, Pignone M (2003) Implementing colon cancer screening. Recommendations from an international workshop. Oncology 9:17–22
Siemens AG (2002) Medical solutions. Computed tomography; its history and technology. Brochure. Siemensstr. 1, D-91301 Forcheim, Germany. Telephone ++49913184-0. www.SiemensMedical.com
Taylor S, Halligan S, Saunders B et al. (2003) Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 181:913–921
Van Dam J, Cotton P, Johnson D et al. (2004) AGA Future Trends Report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 127:970–984
Vining D, Gelfand D, Bechtold R et al. (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. Am J Rotenography 162(suppl):104
Winawer S, Schottenfeld D, Flehinger B (1991) Colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:243–253
Winawer S, Fletcher R, Miller L et al. (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594–642
Winawer S, Zauber A (2002) The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1212:1–9
Yee J, Akerkar G, Hung R et al. (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692
Zalis M (2004) Presentation 5th Annual Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy, Boston, MA, USA
Zubarik R, Fleischer DE, Mastropietro C et al. (1999) Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 50:322–328
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Odulate, A.S., Mortele, K.J. (2006). The Eligible Patient: Indications and Contraindications. In: Lefere, P., Gryspeerdt, S. (eds) Virtual Colonoscopy. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22865-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30904-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)