Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chen S, Lu D, Hecht J et al. (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. Am J Roentgenol 172:595–59
Dachman A, Kuniyoshi J, Boyle C et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR 171:989–995
Fenlon H, Nunes D, Schroy PI et al. (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341(20):1496–1503
Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL et al. (2002) Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27(3):292–300
Fidler J, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Huprich JE, Barlow JM, Earnest F IV, Bartholmai BJ (2004) Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 11:750–756
Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL et al. (1999) CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. Am J Roentgenol 172(5):1271–1278
Fletcher J, Johnson C, Welch T et al. (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: a prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711
Fletcher J, Johnson C, Reed J et al. (2001) Feasibility of planar virtual pathology: a new paradigm in volume-rendered CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:864–869
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE (1997) Colorectal lesions: evaluation with CT colography. Radiographics 17(5):1157–1167; discussion 1167–1168
Macari M, Megibow A (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. Am J Roentgenol 176:137–143
Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M et al. (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two-and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol 174(6):1543–1549
Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL et al. (2003) Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo-and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesions, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly). Radiographics 23(5):1073–1091
Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL et al. (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230(3):629–636
Morrin M, Farrell R, Kruskal J et al. (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217(3):765–771
Pickhardt PJ, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200
Yee J, Akerkar G, Hung R et al. (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692
Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226(3):653–661
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fletcher, J.G., Booya, F. (2006). Pictorial Overview of Normal Anatomy, Mimics of Disease, and Neoplasia at CT Colonography. In: Lefere, P., Gryspeerdt, S. (eds) Virtual Colonoscopy. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30904-7_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22865-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30904-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)