Advertisement

Artificial Urinary Sphincter

  • Jean Michel Guys
  • Geraldine Hery

28.8 Conclusion

The artificial urinary sphincter may be considered one of the methods of choice for the treatment of neurogenic urinary incontinence. In paediatric practice, however, it should not be proposed gratuitously for patients with sphincteric deficits. Obtaining continence is simple if the indications and the technique of implantation are given their due consideration.

Keywords

Public Health Urinary Incontinence Pediatric Surgery Paediatric Practice Artificial Urinary Sphincter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW, Kothari D. Treatment of incontinence secondary to myelodysplasia by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. South Med J 1973; 66:987–990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldwasser B, Furlow WL, Barret DM. The model AS 800 artificial urinary sphincter. Mayo Clinic experience. J Urol 1987; 137:668–671.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Light JK, Scott FB. The artificial urinary sphincter in children. Br J Urol 1984; 56:54–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guys JM, Faure F. Le sphincter artificiel dans le traitement de l’incontinence urinaire d’origine neurologique. In Radiodiagnostic chez l’enfant. Edited by A. Couture, C. Veyrac, C. Baud, Sauramps Medical, pp 300–317;1989.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simeoni J, Guys JM, Mollard P, Buzelin JM, Moscovici J, Bondonny JM, Melin Y, Lortat-Jacob S, Aubert D, Osta F, Galifer B, Debeugny P. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation for neurogenic bladder: a multi institutional study in 107 children. Br J Urol 1996; 78:287–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guys JM, Faure F, Chiapello A, Monfort G. Le sphincter artificiel urinaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques de l’enfant. Chir Pédiatr 1988; 29:178–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lottmann H, Traxer O, Aigrain Y, Melin Y. Posterior approach to the bladder for implantation of the 800 AMS artificial sphincter in children and adolescents: techniques and results in eight patients. Ann Urol (Paris) 1999; 33:357–363Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spiess PE, Capolicchio JP, Kiruluta G, Salle JP, Berardinucci G, Corcos J. Is an artificial sphincter the best choice for incontinent boys with Spina Bifida? Review of our long term experience with the AS 800 artificial sphincter. Can J Urol 2002; 9:1486–1491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Light JK, Pietro T. Alteration in detrusor behaviour and the effect on renal function following insertion of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 1986; 136:632–635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Light JK, Scott FB. Complications of the artificial urinary sphincter in pediatric patients. Urol Clin North Am 1983; 10:551–555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor GA, Lebowitz RL. Artificial urinary sphincters in children: radiographic evaluation. Radiology 1985; 155:91–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klijn AJ, Hop WC, Schroder FH, Bosch JL. Satisfactory long-term results with a sphincter prosthesis in patients with urinary incontinence due to an intrinsic urinary sphincter deficiency: evaluation of 86 patients. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143:352–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noll F, Schreiter F. The AS 800 artificial sphincter for the treatment of incontinence. Urologe 1991; 30:294–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Belloli G, Campobasso P, Mercurella A. Neuropathic urinary incontinence in pediatric patients: management with artificial sphincter. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27:1461–1464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roth DR, Vyas PR, Kroowand RL, Perlumtter AD. Urinary tract deterioration associated with the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 1986; 135:528–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bauer SB, Reda EF, Colodney AH, Retik AB. Detrusor instability: a delayed complication in association with the artificial sphincter. J Urol 1986; 135:1211–1215.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scott FB, Fishman IJ, Shabsigh R. The impact of the artificial urinary sphincter in the neurogenic bladder on the upper urinary tract. J Urol 1986; 136:636–642.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herndon CD, Rink RC, Shaw MB, Simmons GR, Cain MP, Kaefer M, Casale AJ. The Indiana experience with artificial urinary sphincters in children and young adults. J Urol 2003; 169:650–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Badiola FI, Castro-Diaz D, Hart-Austin C, Gonzalez R. Influence of preoperative bladder capacity and compliance on the outcome of artificial sphincter implantation in patients with neurogenic sphincter incompetence. J Urol 1992; 148:1493–1495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maillet F, Buzelin JM, Bouchot O, Karam G. Management of artificial urinary sphincter dysfunction. Eur Urol 2004; 26:241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hafez AT, McLorie G, Bagli D, Khoury A. A single-centre long-term outcome analysis of artificial urinary sphincter placement in children. BJU Int 2002; 89:82–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kryger JV, Leverson G, Gonzalez R. Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincters in children are independent of age at implantation. J Urol 2001; 165 2377–2379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gonzalez R, Jednak R, Franc-Guimond J, Schimke CM. Treating neuropathic incontinence in children with seromuscular colocystoplasty and an artificial urinary sphincter. BJU Int 2002; 90:909–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gonzales R, Nguyen DH, Koleilat N, Sidi AA. Compatibility of enterocystoplasty and the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 1989; 142:502–504.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holmes NM, Kogan BA, Baskin LS. Placement of artificial urinary sphincter in children and simultaneous gastrocystoplasty. J Urol 2001; 165:2366–2368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Y, Hadley HR. Experiences with the artificial urinary sphincter in the irradiated patients. J Urol 1992; 147:612–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Castellan M, Gosalbez R, Labbie A, Ibrahim E, Disandro M. Bladder neck sling for treatment of neurogenic incontinence in children with augmentation cystoplasty: long-term followup. J Urol 2005; 173:2128–2131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomas K, Venn SN, Mundy AR. Outcome of the artificial urinary sphincter in female patients. J Urol 2002; 167:1720–1722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kryger JV, Spencer Barthold J, Fleming P, Gonzalez R. The outcome of artificial urinary sphincter placement after a mean 15-year follow-up in a paediatric population. BJU Int 1999; 83:1026–1031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meulen PH, Zambon V, Kessels AG, Van Kerrebroeck PE. Quality of life, functional outcome and durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter in patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Urol Int 2003; 71:55–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Michel Guys
    • 1
  • Geraldine Hery
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryLa Timône Children’s HospitalMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric SurgeryLa Timône Children’s HospitalMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations