Stroke CT Angiography (CTA)

  • Shams Sheikh
  • R. Gilberto González
  • Michael H. Lev


Vertebral Artery Acute Stroke Shade Surface Display Axial Source Image Hyperacute Stroke 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adams HP, Brott TG, Ferlan AJ et al (1996) Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Circulation 94:1167–1174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alberts MJ (1998) tPA in acute ischemic stroke — United States experience and issues for the future. Neurology 51:S53–S55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barr JD, Mathis JM, Wildenhain SL, Wechsler L, Jungreis CA, Horton JA (1994) Acute stroke intervention with intraarterial urokinase infusion. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 5:705–713Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caplan L, Mohr JP, Kistler P et al (1997) Should thrombolytic therapy be the first-line treatment for acute ischemic stroke? N Engl J Med 337:1309–1310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiu D, Krieger D, Villar-Cordova C et al (1998) Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the first year of clinical practice. Stroke 29:18–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Del Zoppo GJ, Poeck K et al (1992) Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute thrombotic stroke. Ann Neurol 32:78–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Del Zoppo GJ, Pessin MS, Mori E, Hacke W (1991) Thrombolytic intervention in acute thrombotic and embolic stroke. Semin Neurol 11:368–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Del Zoppo GJ (1995) Acute stroke — on the threshold of a therapy. N Engl J Med 333:1632–1633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS, Rowley HA, Gent M (1998) PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. PROACT Investigators. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. Stroke 29:4–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hacke W, Zeumer H, Ferbert A et al (1988) Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy improves outcome in patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusive disease. Stroke 19:1216–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C et al (1995) Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). J Am Med Assoc 274:1017–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Institute of Neurological Disorders for Strokert-PA Stroke Study (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 333:1581–1587Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    NINDS Stroke Study Group (1997) Effect of rt-PA on ischemic lesion size by computed tomography. Preliminary results from the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke 28:2109–2118Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sussman BJ, Fitch TS (1958) Thrombolysis with fibrinolysis in cerebral arterial occlusion. J Am Med Assoc 167:1705–1709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y et al (2005) The DIAS Study Group. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS) a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 36:66–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Von Kummer R, Allen KL, Holle R et al (1997) Acute stroke: usefulness of early CT findings before thromobolytic therapy. Radiology 205:327–333Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lev MH, Nichols SJ (2000) Computed tomographic angiopgraphy and computed tomographic perfusion imaging of hyperacute stroke. Top Magn Reson Imaging 11:273–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lev MH, Farkas J, Rodriguez VR et al (2001) CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:520–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Esteban JM, Cervera V (2004) Perfusion CT and angio CT in the assessment of acute stroke. Neuroradiology 46:705–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garg N, Eshkar N, Tanenbaum L et al (2004) Computed tomography angiographic correlates of early computed tomography signs in acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimag 14:242–245Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chuang YM, Chao AC, Teng MM et al (2003) Use of CT ngiography in patient selection for thrombolytic therapy. Am J Emerg Med 21:167–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cullen SP, Symons SP, Hunter G et al (2002) Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography of acute ischemic stroke: CTA and CTP. Semin Roentgenol 37:192–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith WS, Roberts HC, Chuang NA et al (2003) Safety and feasibility of a CT protocol for acute stroke: combined CT, CT angiography, and CT perfusion imaging in 53 consecutive patients. Am J Neuroradiol 24:688–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verro P, Tanenbaum LN, Borden NM, Sen S, Eshkar N (2002) CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke: preliminary results. Stroke 33:276–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hunter GJ, Hamberg LM, Ponzo JA et al (1998) Assessment of cerebral perfusion and arterial anatomy in hyperacute stroke with three-dimensional functional CT: early clinical results. Am J Neuroradiol 19:29–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwartz RB (1995) Helical (spiral) CT in neuroradiologic diagnosis (review; 8 refs). Radiol Clin North Am 33:981–995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lev MH, Ackerman RH, Lustrin ES et al (1995) Two dimensional spiral CT angiography in carotid occlusive disease: measurement of residual lumen diameter with ultrasound correlation. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lev MH, Ackerman RH, Lustrin ES, Brown JH (1995) A procedure for accurate spiral CT angiographic measurement of lumenal diameter. Proceedings of the 81st Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silverman PM, Kalendar WA, Hazle JD (2001) Common terminology for single and multislice helical CT. Am J Radiol 176:1135–1136Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fox SH, Tanenbaum LN, Ackelsberg S (1998) Future directions in CT technology. Neuroimag Clin North Am 8:497–513Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kallmes DF, Evans AJ, Woodcock RJ et al (1996) Optimization of parameters for the detection of cerebral aneurysms: CT angiography of a model. Radiology 200:403–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Napoli A, Fleischmann D, Chan FP et al (2004) Computed tomography angiography: state-of-the-art imaging using multidetector-row technology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:S32–S45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rydberg J, Bukwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS et al (2000) Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 20:1787–1806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    NRC Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation BV (1990) In: Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wall BF, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 70:437–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McCollough CH, Schueler BA (2000) Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27:828–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jucius RA, Kambic GX (1980) Measurements of computed tomography x-ray fields utilizing the partial volume effect. Med Phys 7:379–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kalendar WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26:2248–2253Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kalendar WA, Prokop M (2001) 3D CT angiography. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 42:1–28Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO (2001) Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. Am J Roentgenol 177:285–287Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ertl-Wagner BB, Hoffmann RT, Bruning R (2004) Multidetector row CT angiography of the brain at various kilovoltage settings. Radiology 231:528–535Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kalra MK, Maher MM, Saini S (2004) Radiation exposure and projected risks with multidetector-row computed tomography scanning: clinical strategies and technologic developments for dose reduction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:S46–S49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kendall BE, Pullicino P (1980) Intravascular contrast injection in ischaemic lesions. II. Effect on prognosis. Neuroradiology 19(5):241–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Doerfler A et al (1998) Are iodinated contrast agents detrimental in acute cerebral ischemia? An experimental study in rats. Radiology 206(1):211–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Han JK et al (2000) Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24(3):400–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Anderson JH (1995) Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation. Acad Radiol 2(3):226–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA (1999) Contrast-mediainduced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Eur Radiol 9(8):1602–1613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morcos SK (1998) Contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity-questions and answers. Br J Radiol 71(844):357–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Aspelin P et al (2003) Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 348(6): 491–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pugh ND (1996) Haemodynamic and rheological effects of contrast media: the role of viscosity and osmolality. Eur Radiol 6[Suppl 2]:S13–S15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Henson JW et al (2004) Gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography of the circle of Willis and neck. Am J Neuroradiol 25(6):969–972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schoellnast H et al (2003) Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: reduction of cost and contrast material dose using saline flush. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(6):847PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schoellnast H et al (2004) Aortoiliac enhancement during computed tomography angiography with reduced contrast material dose and saline solution flush: influence on magnitude and uniformity of the contrast column. Invest Radiol 39(1):20–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bader TR, Prokesch RW, Grabenwoger F (2000) Timing of the hepatic arterial phase during contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the liver: assessment of normal values in 25 volunteers. Invest Radiol 35(8):486–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cademartiri F et al (2002) Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(4): 598–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hopper KD et al (1997) Thoracic spiral CT: delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution in a power injector. Radiology 205(1):269–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Haage P et al (2000) Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax. Am J Roentgenol 174(4): 1049Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kopka L et al (1995) Parenchymal liver enhancement with bolus-triggered helical CT: preliminary clinical results. Radiology 195(1):282–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Paulson EK et al (1998) Helical liver CT with computer-assisted bolus-tracking technology: is it possible to predict which patients will not achieve a threshold of enhancement? Radiology 209(3):787–792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shimizu T et al (2000) Helical CT of the liver with computer-assisted bolus-tracking technology: scan delay of arterial phase scanning and effect of flow rates. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24(2):219–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Puskas Z, Schuierer G (1996) Determination of blood circulation time for optimizing contrast medium administration in CT angiography. Radiologe 36(9):750–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT, part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 207(3): 657–662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rubin GD et al (1998) Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 206(3):823–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rubin GD et al (1993) Three-dimensional spiral computed tomographic angiography: an alternative imaging modality for the abdominal aorta and its branches. J Vasc Surg 18(4):656–664; discussion 665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT, part I. Prediction with a computer model. Radiology 207(3):647–655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP (2000) Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 216(3):872–880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP (2004) Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method. Radiology 231(3):732–736PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Fleischmann D, Hittmair K (1999) Mathematical analysis of arterial enhancement and optimization of bolus geometry for CT angiography using the discrete Fourier transform. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23(3):474–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Fleischmann D et al (2000) Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 214(2):363–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lev MH, Farkas J, Gemmete JJ et al (1999) Acute stroke: improved nonenhanced CT detection — benefits of soft-copy interpretation by using variable window width and center level settings. Radiology 213:150–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dix JA, Evans AJ, Kallmes DF, Sobel A, Phillips CD (1997) Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of the carotid artery bifurcation. Am J Neuroradiol 18:409–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Napel S et al (1992) CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology 185(2):607–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rubin GD et al (1994) Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 190(1):181–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Vieco PT, Morin EE 3rd, Gross CE (1996) CT angiography in the examination of patients with aneurysm clips. Am J Neuroradiol 17(3):455–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kuszyk BS et al (1995) CT angiography with volume rendering: imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 165(2):445–448Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lev MH et al (2001) CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(4):520–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Schramm P et al (2002) Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 33(10):2426–2432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lev MH et al (2003) Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 24(6): 1123–1129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Nguyen-Huynh MN, Lev MH, Rordorf G (2003) Spontaneous recanalization of internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 34(4):1032–1034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kucinski T et al (2003) Collateral circulation is an independent radiological predictor of outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroradiology 45(1):11–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wolpert SM et al (1993) Neuroradiologic evaluation of patients with acute stroke treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. The rt-PA Acute Stroke Study Group. Am J Neuroradiol 14(1):3–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Wildermuth S et al (1998) Role of CT angiography in patient selection for thrombolytic therapy in acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 29(5):935–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kucinski T et al (1998) The predictive value of early CT and angiography for fatal hemispheric swelling in acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 19(5):839–846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Zivin JA (1998) Factors determining the therapeutic window for stroke. Neurology 50(3):599–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Provenzale JM (1995) Dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries: imaging features. Am J Roentgenol 165(5):1099–1104Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Adams HP Jr. et al (1995) Ischemic stroke in young adults. Experience in 329 patients enrolled in the Iowa Registry of stroke in young adults. Arch Neurol 52(5):491–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bogousslavsky J, Regli F (1987) Ischemic stroke in adults younger than 30 years of age. Cause and prognosis. Arch Neurol 44(5):479–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Oelerich M et al (1999) Craniocervical artery dissection: MR imaging and MR angiographic findings. Eur Radiol 9(7):1385–1391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Debernardi S et al (2004) CT angiography in the assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease: results of more than two years’ experience. Radiol Med (Torino) 108(1–2): 116–127Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Shapira MY et al (1999) Esophageal perforation after transesophageal echocardiogram. Echocardiography 16(2):151–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Zaidat O et al (2002) The utility of ultrafast cardiac cycle gated and contrasted spiral computerized axial chest tomography in evaluation of patients with acute stroke and comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Proceedings of the 27th International Stroke Conference. American Stroke Association, San Antonio, Tex.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shams Sheikh
    • 1
  • R. Gilberto González
    • 1
  • Michael H. Lev
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuroradiology DivisionMassachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations