Craniofacial Psychology:New Directions

  • Joyce M. Tobiasen


Cleft Palate Relative Deprivation Facial Appearance Target Person Facial Deformity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Macgregor FC, Abel TM, Bryt A, Lauer E, Weissman S. Facial deformities and plastic surgery: a psychological study. Springfield, IL: Thomas CC; 1953.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crocker J, Major B. Social stigma and self-esteem: the self-protective properties of stigma. Psychol Rev 1989; 96:608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brigham JC. Views of black and white children concerning the distribution of personality characteristics. J Pers 1974; 42:144–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broverman I K, Vogel SR, Broverman DM, Clarkson FE, Rosenkrantz PS. Sex stereotypes: A current appraisal. J Soc Issues 1972; 28:59.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berscheid E, Walster E. Physical attractiveness. In: Berkowitz L (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 7. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 157–215.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richardson SA, Kleck RL. The social status of handicapped and nonhandicapped boys in a camp setting. J Spec Educ 1974; 8:143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herek GM. Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. J Homosex 1984; 10:39–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellsworth RB. A behavioral study of staff attitudes toward mental illness. J Abnorm Psychol 1964; 70:194–200.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peter J, Chinsky R, Fisher M. Sociological aspects of cleft palate adults: II. Social integration. Cleft Palate J 1975; 12:304–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McWilliams BJ, Paradise LP. Educational, occupational, and marital status of cleft palate adults. Cleft Palate J 1974; 10:223–229.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peter J, Chinsky R. Sociological aspects of cleft palate adults: I.Marriage. Cleft Palate J 1974; 11:295–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heller A, Tidmarsh W, Pless IB. The psychological functioning of young adults born with cleft lip or palate. Clinical Pediatrics 1981; 20:459–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bjornsson A, Agustsdottir S. A psychological study of Icelandic individuals with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24:152–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harper DC, Peterson DB. Children of the Philippines: Attitudes toward visible physical impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38:566–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glass L, Starr CD, Stewart RE, Hodge SE. Identikit model II — a potential tool for judging cosmetic appearance. Cleft Palate J 1981; 18:137–151.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Podol J, Salvia J. Effects of visibility of a prepalatal cleft on the evaluation of speech. Cleft Palate J 1976; 13:361–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richman L. The effects of facial disfigurement on teachers’ perceptions of ability in cleft palate children. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15:155–160.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weinberg N, Santana R. Comic books: champion of the disabled stereotype. Rehabil Lit 1978; 39:327–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tobiasen J. Judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24:323–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sameroff A. Transactional models in early social relations. Human Dev 1975; 18:65–79.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosenthal R. On the social psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: further evidence for Pygmalion effects and their mediating mechanisms. New York: MSS Modular Publication, Modular 53; 1974.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Myerson L. Somatopsychology of physical disability. In: Cruickshank WM (ed.) Psychology of exceptional children and youth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1963.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merton R. Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1957.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Darley JM, Fazio RH. Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. Am Psychol 1980; 35:867–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rosenthal R, Jacobson CF. Pygmalion in the classroom: teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston; 1968.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crosby F. Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Langlois JH, Stephan CW. Beauty and the beast: the role of physical attractiveness in the development of peer relations and social behavior. In: Brehm S, Kassin S, Gibbons F (eds.) Developmental social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tobiasen J, Hiebert JM. Clefting and psychological adjustment: influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 20:623–631.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Clifford E. Why are they so normal? Cleft Palate Craniofacial J 1983; 20:83–84.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rosenberg M, Simmons RG. Black and white self-esteem: the urban school child. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association: 1972.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Macoby E, Jacklin CN. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1974.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maruyama G, Miller N. Physical attractiveness and personality. In: Mather BA, Maher WB (eds.) Progress in experimental personality research. New York: Academic Press; 1981. p. 204–281.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gibbons FX. The social psychology of mental retardation: What’s in a label? In: Brehm S, Kassin SM, Gibbons FX (eds.) Developmental social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1981. p. 249–270.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Booth JL. Self-esteem and facial impairment: Deformity is as deformity thinks. University of Kansas Medical Center; 1991. (unpublished paper).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brantley H, Clifford E. Cognitive, self-concept, and body image measures of normal cleft palate and obese patients. Cleft Palate J 1979; 16:177–182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Broder H, Strauss RP. Self concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26; 114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buckloh AB, Lemanek KL, Housh L, Hupp S. The resilience of adolescents with clefts. Paper presented at the 5th Florida Conference on Child Health Psychology; Gainesville, FL: 1995 April 21Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kapp K. Self concept of the cleft lip and/or palate child. Cleft Palate J 1979; 16:171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kapp-Simon K. Self concept of primary and school age children with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both. Cleft Palate J 1986; 23:24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Leonard E, Brust J, Abraham SG, et al. Self-concept of children and adolescents with cleft lip and /or palate. Cleft Palate J 1991; 28:347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Richman L. Behavior and achievement of cleft palate children. Cleft Palate J 1976; 13:4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Starr P. Self-esteem and behavioral functioning of teenagers with orofacial clefts. Rehabil Lit 1978; 39:233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Slifer KJ, Amari A, Diver T, Hilley Beck M, Kane A, McDonnell S. Social interaction patterns of children and adolescents with and without oral clefts during a videotaped analogue social encounter. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004; 41:175–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eiserman W. Unique outcomes and positive contributions associated with facial difference: expanding research and practice. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38:236–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Strauss RP. “Only skin deep”: health, resilience, and craniofacial care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38:226–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abel T. Personality characteristics of the facially impaired. Trans N Y Acad Sci 1952; 4:324–329.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Clifford E. Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. In: Bzoch, KC (ed.) Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. 2nd ed. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1979.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Davis JA. The campus as a frog pond: an application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. Am J Soc 1966; 72:17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1963.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wright B. Physical disability: a psychological approach. New York: Harper & Row; 1960.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kleck R, Strenta A. Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction. J Pers and Social Psychology 1980; 29:861–873.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Strenta A, Kleck R. Physical disability and the perception of social interaction: It’s not what you look at but how you look at it. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1984; 10:279–288.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jensen GF, White CS, Galliber JM. Ethnic status and adolescent self evaluations: an extension of research on minority self-esteem. Soc Probl 1982; 30:226–239.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dion K. Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. In: Olson JM, Herman CP, Zanna MP (eds.) Relative deprivation and social comparison. The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1986; 4:159–179.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Baker WY, Smith LH. Facial discrimination and personality. JAMA 1939; 112:301–304.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Suls JM, Miller RI (eds.) Social comparison processes: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington, DC: Halsted-Wiley; 1977.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Major B, Forcey B. Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for same-sex and same-job wage comparisons. J Exp Soc Psychol 1985; 21:393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Harter S. Processes underlying the construction, maintenance and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In: Suls J, Greenwald AJ (eds.) Psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1986. p. 136–182.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Facial impairment scale for clefts (FISC). Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93:31–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lefebvre A, Travis F, Arndt E, Munro IR. A psychiatric profile before and after reconstructive surgery in children with Apert’s syndrome. Br J Plastic Surg 1986; 39:510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kiyak HA, Hohl T, West RA, Mcneill RW. Psychologic changes in orthognathic surgery patients: A 24 month follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42:506–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Munro IR. The psychological effects of surgical treatment of facial deformity. In: Lucker GW, Ribbens KA, Mcnamara JA (eds.) Psychological aspects of facial form. Ann Arbor, MI: Center of human Growth and Development, Monograph; 1980. p. 171–199.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cash T, Horton C. Aesthetic surgery: Effects of rhinoplasty on the social perception of patients by others. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72:543–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kapp-Simon K. Psychological adaptation of patients with craniofacial malformations. In: Lucker GW, Ribbens KA, Mcnamara JA (eds.) Psychological aspects of facial form. Ann Arbor,MI: Center of Human Growth and Development Monograph 1980; p. 171–199.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joyce M. Tobiasen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations