Radiation Exposure in Thoracic CT

  • J. R. Mayo
  • J. Aldrich
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


Radiation Dose Radiation Exposure Effective Dose Organ Dose Compute Tomography Dose Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atherton JV, Huda W (1996) Energy imparted and effective dose in computed tomography. Med Phys 123:735–741Google Scholar
  2. Beir V (1990) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berland LL, Smith JK (1998) Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 209:327–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al. (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brody AS (2002) CT scanner design and patient radiation exposure. Pediatr Radiol 32:268–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapple C-L, Willis S, Frame J (2002) Effective dose in paediat-ric computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 47:107–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conway BJ, McCrohan JL, Antonsen RG et al. (1992) Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT study. Radiology 184:135–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham IA (1995) Computed tomography: instrumentation. In: Bronzino JE (ed) The biomedical engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 990–1002Google Scholar
  10. Curry TS III, Dowdey JE, Murray RC Jr (1984) Christensen’s introduction to the physics of diagnostic radiology. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 73Google Scholar
  11. Donnelly LF (2002) Lessons from history. Pediatr Radiol 32: 287–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European C (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computer tomography. EUR 16262EN. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, LuxembergGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans SH, Davis R, Cooke J et al. (1989) A comparison of radiation doses to the breast in computed tomographic chest examinations for two scanning protocols. Clin Radiol 40: 45–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fearon T (2002) CT dose parameters and their limitations. Pediatr Radiol 32:246–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frush DP (2002) Strategies of dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol 32:293–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC (2002) Commentary. Radiation dose in CT: Are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol 75:1–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Greess H, Wolf H, Baum U et al. (2000) Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions. Eur Radiol 10:391–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haaga JR, Miraldi F, MacIntyre W et al. (1981) The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomography image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. Radiology 138: 449–454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al. (1999) Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu H (1999) Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys 26:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huda W (1997) Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. AJR 169:1487–1488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Huda W (2002) Effective doses to adult and pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 32:272–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Huda W, Atherton JV (1995) Energy imparted in computed tomography. Med Phys 22:1263–1269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. ICRP-60 (1991) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. International Electrotechnical Commission I (2002) Amendment 1 to IEC 60601-2-44, 2nd edn. Medical electrical equipment, parts 2—44: Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for computed tomography — final draft international standard. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  26. Itoh H, Ikeda M, Arahata S et al. (2000) Lung cancer screening: minimum tube current reqired for helical CT. Radiology 215:175–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jessen KA, Shrimpton PC, Geleijns J et al. (1999) Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. Appl Radiat Isot 50:165–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones AP, Mott DJ, Parkinson L (1992) Experience with a new simple method for the determination of doses in computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:139–142Google Scholar
  29. Jones DG, Shrimpton PC (1993) Normalized organ doses for X-ray CT calculated using Monte Carlo techniques NRPB-SR250. NRPB, Chilton, OxonGoogle Scholar
  30. Jucius RA, Kambic GX (1977) Radiation dosimetry in computed tomography. Appl Opt Instr Eng Med VI 127:286–295Google Scholar
  31. Kalender WA, Polacin A (1991) Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. Med Phys 18:910–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E et al. (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999a) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26:2248–2253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C et al. (1999b) Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 9:323–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Khursheed A, Hiller MC, Shrimpton PC, Wall BF (2002) Infl uence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75:819–830PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee KS, Primack SL, Staples CA et al. (1994) Chronic infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracies of radiography and low-and conventional-dose thin-section CT. Radiology 191:669–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Marco AF di, Briones B (1993) Is chest CT performed too often? Chest 103:985–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marco AF di, Renston JP (1994) In search of the appropriate use of chest computed tomography. Chest 106:332–333Google Scholar
  39. Mayo J, Aldrich J (1996) Radiation exposure. In: Remy-Jardin M, Remy J (eds) Spiral CT of the chest. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, p 39Google Scholar
  40. Mayo JR, Webb WR, Gould R et al. (1987) High-resolution CT of the lungs: an optimal approach. Radiology 163:507–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mayo JR, Jackson SA, Müller NL (1993) High-resolution CT of the chest: radiation dose. AJR 160:479–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayo JR, Hartman TE, Lee KS et al. (1995) CT of the chest: minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose. AJR 164:603–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayo JR, Whittall KP, Leung AN et al. (1997) Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study. Radiology 202:453–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McCollough CH, Schueler BA (2000) Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27:828–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCollough CH, Zink FE (1999) Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys 26:2223–2230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. McGee PL, Humphreys S (1994) Radiation dose associated with spiral computed tomography. Can Assoc Radiol J 45: 124–129Google Scholar
  47. Mettler FA Jr, Upton AC (1995) Medical effects of ionizing radiation. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  48. Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA et al. (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Metz CE, Wagner RF, Doi K et al. (1995) Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems. Med Phys 22:1057–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C et al. (1990) Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology 175: 729–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Naidich DP, Pizzarello D, Garay SM et al. (1994) Is thoracic CT performed often enough? Chest 106:331–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nickoloff E (2002) Current adult and pediatric CT doses. Pediatr Radiol 32:250–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO (2001) Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception and policy. AJR 177:285–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Nishizawa K, Maruyama T, Takayama M et al. (1991) Determinations of organ doses and effective dose equivalents from computed tomographic examination. B J Radiol 64:20–28Google Scholar
  55. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1993) Risk estimates for radiation protection. NCRP report no. 115. Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  56. NRPB (1992) Documents of the NRPB National Radiological Protection Board. III. Chilton, England: National Radiological Protection Board, 1992; 1–16Google Scholar
  57. Panzer W, Scheurer C, Zankl M (1989) Dose to patients in computed tomography examinations: results and consequences from a field study in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Moores BM, Wall BF, Eriskat H, Schibilla H (eds) Optimization of image quality and patient exposure in diagnostic radiology. British Institute of Radiology, London, report 20Google Scholar
  58. Pentlow KS, Beattie JW, Laughlin JS (1977) Parameters and design considerations for tomographic transmission scanners. In: Ter-Pogossian MM, Phelps ME (eds) Reconstructive tomography in diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 267–279Google Scholar
  59. Pierce D, Shimizu Y, Preston D et al. (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part 1. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G (1992) Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 185:29–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Mayo JR et al. (2001) Acquisition, injection, and reconstruction techniques. CT angiography of the chest. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  62. Rogers L (2001a) Radiation exposure in CT: Why so high? AJR 177:277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rogers LF (2001b) Serious business: radiation safety and radiation protection. AJR 177:1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ron E (2002) Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:232–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rothenberg LN, Pentlow KS (1992) Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics 12:1225–1243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC (1981) A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 8:488–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shrimpton PC, Edyvean S (1998) CT scanner dosimetry. Br J Radiol 71:1–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF (2000) Reference doses for paediatric computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim 90:249–252Google Scholar
  69. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Wall BF et al. (1991a) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 1: Survey of CT practice in the UK. Chilton, Oxon, NRPB report R-248Google Scholar
  70. Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC et al. (1991b) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2: dosimetric aspects. Chilton, Oxon, NRPB report R-249Google Scholar
  71. Sinclair WK (1994) The concept of effective dose. Health Phys 66:586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Slovis TL (2002a) Welcome and introduction to the ALARA Conference on the ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol 32:222Google Scholar
  73. Slovis TL (2002b) Discussion, consensus, and mandate. Pediatr Radiol 32:301–313Google Scholar
  74. Slovis TL (2002c) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sprawls P Jr (1992) AAPM tutorial. CT image detail and noise. Radiographics 12:1041–1046PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Sternberg S. CT scans in children linked to cancer later. USA Today 2001; Jan 22:1Google Scholar
  77. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al. (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:508–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Toth TL (2002) Dose reduction opportunities for CT scanners. Pediatr Radiol 32:261–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Toth TL, Bromberg NB, Pan TS et al. (2000) A dose reduction X-ray beam positioning system for high-speed multislice CT scanners. Med Phys 27:2659–2668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. UNSCEAR (1993) United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 1993 report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes. New York, NY: United Nations 1993Google Scholar
  81. Varchena V (2002) Pediatric phantoms. Pediatr Radiol 32: 280–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G (1991) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part VI: Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations. GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut für Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  83. Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G (1993) Tomographic anthropomorphic models. Part II: Organ doses from computed tomographic examinations in paediatric radiology. GSF-Forschungszentrum fur Umwelt und Gesundtheit, Institut fur Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  84. Zwirewich CV, Mayo JR, Müller NL (1991) Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma. Radiology 180:413–417PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Mayo
    • 1
  • J. Aldrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Vancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver, BCCanada

Personalised recommendations