Angiography in Kidney Cancer

  • Jocelyn A. S. Brookes
  • Uday Patel
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

5.6 Conclusion

From occupying a central role in the evaluation of kidney cancer, renal arteriography has been relegated to a problem-solving secondary role in the modern era. This is partly due to the changing presentation of renal tumors; most are now identified at an early stage, and renal arteriography is insensitive when compared with the cross-sectional modalities for evaluation of small renal masses. Arteriography is now seldom used for diagnosis. For staging it may help in the occasional case with indeterminate findings regarding venous involvement on CT and MR imaging. It may have some utility for pre-operative surgical planning, but mostly it is now used for planning of therapeutic or palliative tumor embolization.


Renal Cell Carcinoma Renal Artery Inferior Vena Cava Renal Cancer Renal Mass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahms HL (1964) The response of neoplastic renal vessels to epinephrine in man. Radiology 82:217–223Google Scholar
  2. Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson S-G, Strasser R, Wilenbrock R, Berg KJ (2003) Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 348:491–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakal CW, Cynamon J, Lakritz PS, Sprayregen S (1993) Value of preoperative renal artery embolization in reducing blood transfusion requirements during nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:727–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balfe DM, McClennan BL, Stanley RJ, Weyman PJ, Sagel SS (1982) Evaluation of renal masses considered indeterminate on computerised tomography. Radiology 142:421–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baris S, Karakaya D, Aykent R, Kirdar K, Sagkan O, Tur A (2001) Comparison of midazolam with or without fentanyl for conscious sedation and hemodynamics in coronary angiography. Can J Cardiol 17:277–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bracken B, Jonsson K (1979) How accurate is angiographic staging of renal carcinoma? Urology 14:96–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Das G, Chisholm GD, Sherwood T (1977) Can angiography stage renal carcinoma? Br J Urol 49:611–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deray G (2004) Value of N-acetylcysteine to prevent nephrotoxicity from iodinated contrast agents. J Radiol 85:725–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dos Santos R, Lamas A, Caldas JP (1929) Arteriography of the aorta and the abdominal blood vessels. Bull Mem Soc Nat Chir 55:587–601Google Scholar
  10. Elkin M (1990) Stages in the growth of uroradiology. Radiology 175:297–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans AT (1957) Renal cancer: translumber arteriography for its recognition. Radiology 69:657–662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fichtner J, Swoboda A, Hutschenreiter G, Neuerburg J (2003) Percutaneous embolization of the kidney: indications and clinical results. Aktuelle Urol 34:475–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gammill SL, Shipkey FH, Himmelfarb EH, Parvey LS, Rabinowitz JG (1976) Roentgenology-pathology correlative study of neovascularity. Am J Roentegenol 126:376–385Google Scholar
  14. Hagen G, Wadstrom J, Magnusson A (2003) 3D rotational angiography of transplanted kidneys. Acta Radiol 44:193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones T, McCutcheon H (2004) A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 16:243–246Google Scholar
  16. Kalman D, Varenhorst E (1999) The role of arterial embolization in renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol 33:162–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufmann JA, Geller SC, Bazari H, Waltman AC (1999) Gadolinium based contrast agents as an alternative at vena cavography in patients with renal insufficiency: early experiences. Radiology 212:280–284Google Scholar
  18. Lang EK, Johnson B, Chance HL, Enright JR, Fontenot R, Trichel BE, Martin EC (1972) Assessment of avascular renal masses: the use of nephrotomography, arteriography, cyst puncture, double contrast study and histochemical and histopathologic examination of the aspirate. South Med J 65:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Levin DC, Gordon D, Kinkhabwala M, Becker JA (1976) Reticular neovascularity in malignant and inflammatory renal masses. Radiology 120:61–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Levine E (1995) Renal cell carcinoma: clinical aspects, imaging diagnosis and staging. Semin Roentgenol 30:128–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin PH, Terramani TT, Bush RL, Keane TE, Moore RG, Lumsden AB (2003) Concomitant intraoperative renal artery embolization and resection of complex renal carcinoma. J Vasc Surg 38:446–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Manno C, Strippoli GF, Arnesano L, Bonifati C, Campobasso N, Gesualdo L, Schena FP (2004) Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 66:1570–1577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McClennan BL, Deyoe LA (1994) The imaging evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis and staging. Radiol Clin North Am 32:55–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moline LR (2000) Patient psychologic preparation for invasive procedures: an integrative review. J Vasc Nurs 18:117–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Onishi T, Oishi Y, Suzuki Y, Asano K (2001) Prognostic evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization for unresectable renal cell carcinoma with distant metastasis. BJU Int 87:312–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ritchie AW, Chisholm GD (1983) The natural history of renal carcinoma. Semin Oncol 10:390–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy C, Tuchmann C, Morel M, Saussine C, Jacqmin D, Tongio J (1999) Is there still a place for angiography in the management of renal mass lesions? Eur Radiol 9:329–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandhu C, Belli AM, Patel U (2003) Demonstration of renal arterial anatomy and tumor neovascularity for vascular mapping of renal cell carcinoma: the value of CO2 angiography. Br J Radiol 76:89–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Seymour HR, Matson MB, Belli AM, Morgan R, Kyriou J, Patel U (2001) Rotational digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries: technique and evaluation in the study of native and transplant renal arteries Br J Radiol 74:134–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tepel M, Zidek W (2002) Acetylcysteine and contrast media nephropathy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 11:503–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomsen HS, Almen T, Morcos SK (2002) Gadolinium containing contrast media for radiographic examinations: a position paper. Eur Radiol 12:2600–2605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ueda T, Tobe T, Yamamoto S, Motoori K, Murakami Y, Igarashi T, Ito H (2004) Selective intra-arterial three-dimensional computed tomography angiography for pre-operative evaluation of nephron-sparing surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:496–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Uson AC, Melicow MM, Lattimer JK (1963) Is renal arteriography a reliable test in the differential diagnosis between renal cysts and neoplasms? J Urol 89:554–559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vaitkus PT (2002) Effectiveness of mechanical compression devices in attaining hemostasis after femoral sheath removal. Am J Crit Care 11:155–162Google Scholar
  35. Watson RC, Fleming RJ, Evans JA (1968) Arteriography in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma: review of 100 cases. Radiology 91:888–897PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Weyman PJ, McClennan BL, Stanley RJ, Levitt RG, Sagel SS (1980) Comparison of computed tomography and angiography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma. Radiology 137:417–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Whittier WL, Korbet SM (2004) Renal biopsy: update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13:661–665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Watanabe O, Yoshimatsu S, Ueno S, Ishimaru S, Kan M, Takano S, Ninomiya M (1992) Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and radiologic correlation. Radiology 184:493–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zagoria RJ (2000) Imaging of small renal masses. A medical success story. Am J Roentgenol 175:945–955Google Scholar
  40. Zielinski H, Szmigielski S, Petrovich Z (2000) Comparison of preoperative embolization followed by radical nephrectomy with radical nephrectomy alone for renal cell carcinoma Am J Clin Oncol 23:6–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jocelyn A. S. Brookes
    • 1
  • Uday Patel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyThe Middlesex Hospital, UCLHLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of RadiologySt. George’s Hospital and Medical SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations