Skip to main content

Cognition and Decision in Multi-agent Modeling of Spatial Entities at Different Geographical Scales

  • Conference paper
Complex Artificial Environments

Abstract

The modeling of the dynamics of settlement systems can be developed at different geographical scales according to the theoretical framework which is chosen: the micro-level of the households and entrepreneurs, the meso-level of cities and regions, the macro-level of hierarchical and spatial structures. The underlying hypotheses and the links between these three levels are discussed in the case of a multi-agent system (MAS) approach. The question of which are the driving forces of change in a settlement system is raised. Then different ways for building hybrid models combining dynamics referring to different scales are discussed. I refer to the example of SimPop, a MAS model which simulates the emergence and the evolution of a settlement system on a period of 2000 years, in order to illustrate how a function of urban governance that ensures both cognitive and decisional capacities for the evolution of cities can be introduced in a model whose rules are principally built on meso-level regularities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, P., (1997). Cities and regions as self-organizing systems; models of complexity, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arentze, T., Timmermans, H., (2003). Modeling agglomeration forces in urban dynamics: a multi-agent system approach, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Sendai, Japan (www.ddss.arch/tue/nl/people/pages/theo/publications/AGGLOMERATION.pdf )

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschan, C, Mathian, H., Sanders, L., Mäkilä, K., (2000). A spatial microsimulation of population dynamics in Southern France: a model integrating individual decisions and spatial constraints, in (Ballot and Weisbuch, eds.), Applications of Simulation to Social Sciences, Hermes, Paris, p109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, J., (2003). Simulating Urban Dynamics in Latin American Cities, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on GeoComputation, Southampton (www.geocomputation.org/2003/ )

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., (2001). Polynucleated Urban Landscapes, Urban Studies, vol. 38,4, p635–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, I., Hatna, E., 2003, Human choice behavior makes city dynamics robust and, thus, predictable, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on GeoComputation, University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle, A., Mathian, H., Pumain, D., Rozenblat, C., (2000). Long-term dynamics of European towns and cities: towards a spatial model of urban growth, Cybergeo, 131 (www.cybergeo.presse.fr), 17p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bura, S., Guérin-Pace, F., Mathian, H., Pumain, D., Sanders, L., 1996, Multi-agents system and the dynamics of a settlement system, Geographical Analysis, 28,2, 161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, U., (2000). Interrelationship between household and housing market: a microsimulation model of household formation among the young, Cybergeo, 135 (www.cybergeo.presse.fr).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, E., Holme, K., Mäkilä, K., Mattson-Kauppi, Mörtvik, (2004). The microsimulation model SVERIGE; content, validation and applications, SMC, Kiruna, Sweden (www.sms.kiruna.se)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T., Kresl, J., Van West, C., Carr, E., Wilshusen H., (2000). Be there then: a modeling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral Pueblo populations of the Mesa Verde Region, U.S. Southwest, in (Kohler and Gumerman, eds.), Dynamics in human primate societies; agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Oxford, p145–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeckel, R., Schürmann, C., Wegener, M., (2002). Microsimulation of urban land use, Proceedings of the 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriconi-Ebrard, F., (1993). L’Urbanisation du Monde depuis 1950, Paris, Anthropos, 372p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otter, H., van der Veen, A., de Vriend, H., (2001). ABLOoM: Location behaviour,spatial patterns, and agent-based modeling, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.4,no4, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/4/2.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, M., Parisel, C., Pumain, D. and Sanders, L. (2001). Knowledge-based simulation of settlement systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25,2, 167–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, M., Langlois A., (1997). Spatial dynamics, cellular automata, and parallel processing computers, Environment and Planning B, 24, 193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Portugali, J., Benenson, I., Omer, I., (1997). Spatial cognitive dissonance and sociospatial emergence in a self-organizing city, Environment and Planning B, 24, 263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D., (2000). Settlement systems in the evolution, Geografiska Annaler, 82B,2, 73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders L. Pumain D. Mathian H. Guérin-Pace F. Bura S. (1997). SIMPOP: a multiagent system for the study of urbanism. Environment and Planning B, 24, 287–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, L., (1999). Modeling within a self-organizing or a microsimulation framework: opposition or complementarity, Cybergeo no 90 (www.cybergeo.presse.fr).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelling, T., (1971). Dynamic model of segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, p143–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, P.M., (2001). Can geocomputation save urban simulation? Throw some agents into the mixture, simmer and wait…, CASA working paper, 32, http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/paper31.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, P., (2002). UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68,3, 297–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidlich, W., Haag, G. (eds.) (1988). Interregional migration, Dynamic theory and comparative analysis, Berlin, Springer Verlag, 387p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sanders, L. (2006). Cognition and Decision in Multi-agent Modeling of Spatial Entities at Different Geographical Scales. In: Portugali, J. (eds) Complex Artificial Environments. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29710-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics