Skip to main content

New Developments in Caries Removal and Restoration

  • Chapter
Operative Dentistry
  • 2948 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson DR, Cobb CM, Killoy WJ. The effect of an air-powder abrasive system on in vitro root surfaces. J Periodontol 1984; 55:13–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro validation of carious dentin removed using different excavation criteria. Am J Dent 2003; 16:228–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baume LJ, Holz J. Long term clinical assessment of direct pulp capping. Int Dent J 1981; 31:251–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baysan A, Lynch E. Effect of ozone on the oral microbiota and clinical severity of primary root caries. Am J Dent 2004; 17:56–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baysan A, Whiley RA, Lynch E. Antimicrobial effect of a novel ozone-generating device on micro-organisms associated with primary root carious lesions in vitro. Caries Res 2000; 34:498–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bettner MD, Beiswanger MA, Miller CH, Palenik CJ. Effect of ultrasonic cleaning on microorganisms. Am J Dent 1998; 11:185–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonecker M, Toi C, Cleaton-Jones P. Mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in carious dentine before and after Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. JDent 2003; 31:423–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston DW. New device for selective dentin caries removal. Quintessence Int 2003; 34:678–685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bulut G, Zekioglu O, Eronat C, Bulut H. Effect of Carisolv on the human dental pulp: a histological study. J Dent. 2004; 32:309–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess JO, Alvarez A, Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1997; 22:128–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjor IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001; 29:317–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cipriano TM, Ferreira Santos JF. Clinical behavior of repaired amalgam restorations: a two-year study. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:8–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox CF, Subay RK, Ostro E, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH. Tunnel defects in dentin bridges: their formation following direct pulp capping. Oper Dent 1996; 21:4–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cudd LA, Burrows GE, Clarke CR Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of tolonium chloride in sheep. Vet Hum Toxicol 1996; 38:329–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dederich DN, Bushick RD; ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and Division of Science; Journal of the American Dental Association. Lasers in dentistry: separating science from hype. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135:204–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dostalova T, Jelinkova H, Krejsa O, Hamal K, Kubelka J, Prochazka S, Himmlova L. Dentin and pulp response to Erbium:YAG laser ablation: a preliminary evaluation of human teeth. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1997; 15:117–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eguro T, Maeda T, Otsuki M, Nishimura Y, Katsuumi I, Tanaka H. Adhesion of Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin and composite resins: application of various treatments on irradiated surface. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 30:267–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elderton RJ, Davis M. Restorative dental treatment in the General Dental Service in Scotland. Br Dent J 1984; 157:196–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elderton RJ. The prevalence of failure of restorations: a literature review. J Dent 1976a; 4:207–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elderton RJ. The causes of failure of restorations; a literature review. J Dent 1976b; 4:257–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DJ, Matthews S, Pitts NB, Longbottom C, Nugent ZJ. A clinical evaluation of an Erbium:YAG laser for dental cavity preparation. Br Dent J 2000; 24;188:677–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster LV. Three year in vivo investigation to determine the progression of approximal primary carious lesions extending into dentine. Br Dent J 1998; 185:353–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frencken JE, Van’t Hof MA, VanAmerongen WE, Holmgren CJ. Effectiveness of singlesurface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2004; 83:120–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fusayama T. Clinical guide for removing caries using a caries-detecting solution. Quintessence Int 1988; 19:397–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Comparisonof atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int 2003; 34:31–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Going RE, Loesche WJ, Grainger DA, Syed SA. The viability of microorganisms in carious lesions five years after covering with a fissure sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 97:455–462.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J, Tanzer J, Munster E, Amara J, Thal F, Birkhed D. Cross-sectional clinical evaluation of recurrent caries, restoration of marginal integrity, and oral hygiene status. J Am Dent Assoc 1981; 102:635–641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg M, Six N, Decup F, Buch D, Soheili Majd E, Lasfargues JJ, Salih E, Stanislawski L. Applicationof bioactive molecules inpulp-capping situations. Adv Dent Res 2001;15:91–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman SL, Washburn F, Wopperer P. Two-year report of sealant effect on bacteria in dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93:967–970.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth: a 7-year follow-up study. Swed Dent J 1998; 22; 1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B. Behaviour of approximal carious lesions assessed by clinical examination after tooth separation and radiography: a 2.5 year longitudinal study in young adults. Caries Res 1999; 33:415–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoke JA, Burkes EJ Jr, Gomes ED, Wolbarsht ML. Erbium:YAG (2.94mum) laser effects on dental tissues J Laser Appl 1990; 2:61–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honkala S, Honkala E. Atraumatic dental treatment among Finnish elderly persons. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:435–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:753–759.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn KR, Geitel B, Kostka E, Wischnewski R, Roulet JF. Tensile bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel. Adhes Dent 1999; 1:25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokstad A, Mjör IA. Analysesof long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations. Acta Odont Scand 1991; 49:47–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kakaboura A, Masouras C, Staikou O, Vougiouklakis G. A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method. Quintessence Int 2003; 34:269–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kavvadia K, Karagianni V, Polychronopoulou A, Papagiannouli L. Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:23–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly PG, Smales RJ. Long-term cost-effectiveness of single indirect restorations in selected dental practices. Br Dent J 2004; 196:639–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Smith MM, Allan R, Howe L, Smith SR. The use of a caries detector dye in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1989; 167:132–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd EAM. How ‘clean’ must a cavity be before restoration? Caries Res 2004; 38:305–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Kim B, Yoon S. Effect on the healing of periapical perforations in dogs of the addition of growth factors to calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2001; 27:734–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein H, Fuks A, Eidelman E, Chosak A. Partial pulpotomy following complicated crown fracture in permanent incisors: a clinical and radiographical study. J Pedod 1985; 9:142–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohns P, Zhou P, Stormann R. Effective laser ablation of enamel and dentine without thermal side effects. J Laser Appl 1997; 9:171–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurell KA, Carpenter W, Daugherty D, Beck M. Histopathologic effects of kinetic cavity preparation for the removal of enamel and dentin. An in vivo animal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80:214–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson LC, Smith BG. Replacement of missing cusps: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994; 22:118–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malmstrom HS, Chaves Y, Moss ME. Patient preference: conventional rotary handpieces or air abrasion for cavity preparation. Oper Dent 2003; 28:667–671.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, van’t Hof MA. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Caries Res 2003; 37:246–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo T, Nakanishi T, Shimizu H, Ebisu S. A clinical study of direct pulp capping applied to carious-exposed pulps. J Endod 1996; 22:551–556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel RJ, Davis RD, Murchison DF, Cohen RB. Causes of failure among cuspalcoverage amalgam restorations: a clinical survey. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:173–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merret CW, Elderton RJ. An in vitro study of restorative treatment decisions and dental caries. Br Dent J 1984; 157:128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mestrener SR, Holland R, Dezan E Jr. Influence of age on the behavior of dental pulp of dog teeth after capping with an adhesive system or calcium hydroxide. Dent Traumatol 2003; 19:255–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: early lesions. Quintessence Int. 2000; 31:535–546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Slaby I, Matsumoto K, Ritchie HH, Lyngstadaas SP. Immunohistochemical characterization of rapid dentin formation induced by enamelmatrix derivative. Calcif Tissue Int 2004; 75:243–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuckles DB, Draughn RA, Smith TI. Evaluation of an adhesive system for amalgam repair: bond strength and porosity. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:829–833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuki M, Eguro T, Maeda T, Tanaka H. Comparison of the bond strength of composite resin to Er:YAG laser irradiated human enamel pre-treated with various methods in vitro. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 30:351–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palma-Dibb RG, de Castro CG, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:57–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson FM, Paterson RC, Watts A, Blinkhorn AS. Initial stages in the development of valid criteria for the replacement of amalgam restorations. JDent 1995; 23:137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilka GJ, Bell M, Häberlein I, Mehl A, Hickel R, Flemmig TF: In vitro evaluation of novel low abrasive air polishing powders. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30:9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts NB, Rimmer PA. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth. Caries Res 1992; 26:146–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rafique S, Fiske J, Banerjee A. Clinical trial of an air-abrasion/chemomechanical operative procedure for the restorative treatment of dental patients. Caries Res 2003; 37:360–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard G, Richardson R, Johnson T, McColl D, Hooper L. Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 3:CD004153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts D. Management of the deep carious lesion and the vital pulp dentine complex. Br Dent J 2001; 191:606–610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford RB, Niekrash CE, Kennedy JE, Charette MF. Platelet-derived and insulinlike growth factors stimulate regeneration of periodontal attachment in monkeys. J Periodontal Res 1992; 27:285–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sen D, Nayir E, Çetiner F. Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:446–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shovelton DS. A study of deep carious dentin. Int Dent J 1968; 18:392–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival of repaired amalgams, recemented crowns and gold castings. Oper Dent 2004; 29:249–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smales RJ, Wetherell JD. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Oper Dent 2000; 25:374–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smales RJ, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries. Quintessence Int 2002; 33:427–432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spahr A, Lyngstadaas SP, Boeckh C, Andersson C, Podbielski A, Haller B. Effect of the enamelmatrix derivative Emdogain on the growth of periodontal pathogens in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29:62–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:923–931.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CC, Land MF, Albin-Wilson SM, Stewart GP. Caries detection accuracy by multiple clinicians and techniques Gen Dent 2000; 48:334–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D’Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003; 31:395–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth CL, Martin MV, Gallagher M, Worthington HV. A comparison of decontamination methods used for dental burs. Br Dent J 2004; 197:635–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JA, Pearson GJ, Colles MJ, Wilson M. The effect of variable energy input from a novel light source on the photoactivated bactericidal action of toluidine blue O on Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 2003; 37:190–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yazici AR, Atilla P, Ozgunaltay G, Muftuoglu S. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal. J Oral Rehabil 2003 30:1177–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA. The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1994; 176:417–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young C, Bongenhielm U. A randomised, controlled and blinded histological and immunohistochemical investigation of Carisolv on pulp tissue. J Dent 2001; 29:275–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). New Developments in Caries Removal and Restoration. In: Operative Dentistry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29618-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29618-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29616-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-29618-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics