Zusammenfassung
Dieses Kapitel gibt zuerst einen kurzen historischen Überblick über „Reasoning“, d. h. Schließen, Wissensrepräsentation und „künstliche Intelligenz“. Der Hauptteil geht auf einige „Reasoning“-Mechanismen und -Konzepte, die im Semantic Web eine Rolle spielen, ein und zeigt, wie dieses „Reasoning“ — unauffällig — in den Konzepten des Semantic Web zur Beschreibung von Wissensbasen enthalten ist. Weiterhin werden Reasoning-Mechanismen umrissen, die dem Zusammenspiel verschiedener Knoten im Semantic Web dienen, und ein kurzes Fazit gezogen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
G. Antoniou, E. Franconi, and F. van Harmelen. Introduction to semantic web ontology languages. In Reasoning Web, First International Summer School. Springer LNCS 3564, 2005.
F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
R. J. Brachman and J. G. Schmolze. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9(2):171–216, 1985.
M. D’Agostino, D. Gabbay, R. Hähnle, and J. Posegga, editors. Handbook of Tableau Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
S. Decker, D. Brickley, J. Saarela, and J. Angele. A Query Service for RDF. QL’98-The Query Languages Workshop, 1998.
D. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger, and J. A. Robinson. Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. Oxford Science Publ., 1994.
V. Haarslev and R. Möller. Racer system description. In Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR). Springer LNCS 2083, 2001. http://www.racer-systems.com.
I. Horrocks. Using an expressive description logic: Fact or Fiction? In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pages 636–647, 1998. http://www.ca.man.ac.uk/~horrocks/FaCT.
I. Horrocks, D. Fensel, J. Broekstra, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, C. Goble, F. van Harmelen, M. Klein, S. Staab, R. Studer, and E. Motta. The ontology inference layer OIL, 2000. Available at http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil.
I. Horrocks, P. Patel-Schneider, and F. van Harmelen. From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1):7–26, 2004.
I. Horrocks and U. Sattler. A tableau decision procedure for SHOIQ(D). In Intl. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2005.
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. Pellet: An OWL DL reasoner. http://www.mindswap.org/2003/pellet.
Jena: A Java Framework for Semantic Web Applications. http://jena.sourceforge.net.
M. Kifer and G. Lausen. F-Logic: A higher-order language for reasoning about objects, inheritance and scheme. In ACM Intl. Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 134–146, 1989.
M. Minsky. A framework for representing knowledge. In J. Haugeland, editor, Mind Design. MIT Press, 1981.
M. Schmidt-Schauss and G. Smolka. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 48(1):1–26, 1991.
A. Sheth, C. Ramakrishnan, and C. Thomas. Semantics for the semantic web: The implicit, the formal and the powerful. J. on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 1(1):1–18, 2005.
Zu den genannten Sprachvorschlägen findet man die aktuellsten Referenzen im Web am besten mit Google. http://www.google.de.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
May, W. (2006). Reasoning im und für das Semantic Web. In: Pellegrini, T., Blumauer, A. (eds) Semantic Web. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29325-6_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29325-6_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29324-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-29325-5
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)