Three-Dimensional Doppler Ultrasound in Gynecology

  • Ivica Zalud
  • Lawrence D. Platt

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Campani R, Bottinelli O, Calliada F, Coscia D (1998) The latest in ultrasound: three-dimensional imaging. Part II. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S183–S187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleischer AC (2001) New developments in the sonographic assessment of ovarian, uterine, and breast vascularity. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22:42–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wells PN (1998) Doppler studies of the vascular system. Eur J Ultrasound 7:3–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pan HA, Wu MH, Cheng YC, Wu LH, Chang FM (2004) Quantification of ovarian stromal Doppler signals in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization with three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:338–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Kendall NR, Clewes JS, Johnson IR (2004) Quantifying the changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with three-dimensional power Doppler angiography. Hum Reprod 19: 330–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Johnson IR (2003) The reliability of virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:633–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M, Gavric Lovrec V, Zazula D, Sergent N (2003) Measurement of perifollicular blood flow of the dominant preovulatory follicle using three-dimensional power Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:520–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu MH, Tsai SJ, Pan HA, Hsiao KY, Chang FM (2003) Three-dimensional power Doppler imaging of ovarian stromal blood flow in women with endometriosis undergoing in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:480–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kupesic S, Kurjak A (2002) Predictors of IVF outcome by three-dimensional ultrasound. Hum Reprod 17:950–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schild RL, Holthaus S, d’Alquen J, Fimmers R, Dorn C, van der Ven H, Hansmann M (2000) Quantitative assessment of subendometrial blood flow by three-dimensional-ultrasound is an important predictive factor of implantation in an in-vitro fertilization program. Hum Reprod 15:89–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, Prka M, Bekavac I (2003) The detection of stage I ovarian cancer by three-dimensional sonography and power Doppler. Gynecol Oncol 90:258–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Czekierdowski A, Smolen A, Bednarek W, Kotarski J (2002) Three dimensional sonography and 3D power angiography in differentiation of adnexal tumors. Ginekol Pol 73:1061–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen LS, Escobar PF, Scharm C, Glimco B, Fishman DA (2001) Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. Gynecol Oncol 82:40–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, Kosuta D (2000) Three-dimensional ultrasonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovarian lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:365–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sparac V, Kupesic S, Kurjak A (2000) What do contrast media add to three-dimensional power Doppler evaluation of adnexal masses? Croat Med J 41:257–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suren A, Osmers R, Kuhn W (1998) 3D Color power angio imaging: a new method to assess intracervical vascularization in benign and pathological conditions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:133–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Platt LD, Santulli T Jr, Carlson DE, Greene N, Walla CA (1998) Three-dimensional ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology: preliminary experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:1199–1206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yaman C, Ebner T, Jesacher K (2002) Three-dimensional power Doppler in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20:513–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sladkevicius P, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G (2000) Three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the assessment of Fallopian tube patency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:644–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan CC, Ng EH, Li CF, Ho PC (2003) Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 18:2175–2180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Hull A, Riccabona M, Sklansky MS, James G (2000) Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:374–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivica Zalud
    • 1
  • Lawrence D. Platt
    • 2
  1. 1.Fetal Diagnostic Center, Rm 540 Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and ChildrenHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obsterics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California at Los Angeles Center for Fetal Medicine and Women’s UltrasoundLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations