Skip to main content

Doppler Velocimetry for Fetal Surveillance: Adverse Perinatal Outcome and Fetal Hypoxia

  • Chapter
Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Summary

There is ample evidence that Doppler indices from the fetal circulation can reliably predict adverse perinatal outcome in an obstetric patient population with a high prevalence of complications, such as fetal growth restriction and hypertension. This efficacy is not evident, however, in populations with a low prevalence of pregnancy complications. It is also apparent that fetal Doppler indices are capable of reflecting fetal respiratory deficiency with varying degrees of efficiency. The umbilical arterial Doppler indices are more sensitive to asphyxia than to hypoxia, whereas cerebral Doppler indices demonstrate significant sensitivity to hypoxia. Compared to fetal heart rate monitoring and the biophysical profile, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry shows mostly similar and often superior efficacy. Furthermore, progressive fetal deterioration manifests in sequential abnormalities of the various fetal assessment parameters, starting with middle cerebral artery vasodilation and eventual progression to disappearance of the fetal heart rate variability, late deceleration, and the absence or reversal of the end-diastolic velocity in the umbilical artery. Evidently, no single testing modality should be regarded as the exclusive choice for fetal surveillance, as these tests reveal different aspects of fetal pathophysiology, often in a complementary manner. Clearly, more work is needed to determine the optimal integration of the various surveillance methods for improving perinatal outcome in a cost-effective manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohn H, Sachs E, Heymann M, Rudolph A (1974) Cardiovascular responses to hypoxemia and acidemia in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 120:817–823

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trudinger BJ, Cook CM, Jones L, Giles WB (1986) A comparison of fetal heart rate monitoring and umbilical artery waveforms in the recognition of fetal compromise. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:171–175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Devoe LD, Gardner P, Dear C, Castillo RA (1990) The diagnostic values of concurrent nonstress testing, amniotic fluid measurement, and Doppler velocimetry in screening a general high-risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:1040–1047

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swets JA, Pickett RM (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. Academic Press, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  6. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maulik D, Yarlagadda P, Youngblood JP, Ciston P (1990) The diagnostic efficacy of the umbilical arterial systolic/diastolic ratio as a screening tool: a prospective blinded study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:1518–1523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Farmakides G, Schulman H, Winter D et al (1988) Prenatal surveillance using non-stress testing and Doppler velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol 71:184–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Soliani A, Romanini C (1991) Doppler velocimetry versus nonstress test in the antepartum monitoring of low-risk pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 10:331–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hastie SJ, Brown MF, Whittle MJ (1990) Predictive values of umbilical artery waveforms and repeat cardiotocography in pregnancies complicated by nonreactive cardiotocography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 34:67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nordstrom UL, Patel NB, Taylor DJ (1989) Umbilical artery waveform analysis and biophysical profile: a comparison of two methods to identify compromised fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 30:245–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maršál K, Ley D (1992) Intrauterine blood flow and postnatal neurological development in growth-retarded fetuses. Biol Neonate 62:258–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Amiel-Tison C et al (2001) Correlation between prenatal velocity waveforms in the aortic isthmus and neurodevelopmental outcome between the ages of 2 and 4 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:630–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Todd AL, Trudinger BJ, Cole MJ, Cooney GH (1992) Antenatal tests of fetal welfare and development at age 2 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:66–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beattie RB, Dornan JC (1989) Antenatal screening for intrauterine growth retardation with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography. BMJ 298:631–635

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanretty KP, Primrose MH, Neilson JP, Whittle MJ (1989) Pregnancy screening by Doppler uteroplacental and umbilical waveforms. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:1163–1167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Newnham JP, Patterson LL, James IR, Diepeveen DA, Reid SE (1990) An evaluation of the efficacy of Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis as a screening test in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:403–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sijmons EA, Reuwer PJ, van Beek E, Bruinse HW (1989) The validity of screening for small-for-gestational-age and low-weight-for-length infants by Doppler ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:557–561

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Soothill PW, Nicolaides KH, Bilardo K, Campbell S (1986) Relation of fetal hypoxia in growth retardation to mean blood velocity in the fetal aorta. Lancet 2:1118–1120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolaides KH, Bilardo CM, Soothill PW, Campbell S (1988) Absence of end diastolic frequencies in umbilical artery: a sign of fetal hypoxia and acidosis. BMJ 297:1026–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrazzi E, Pardi G, Bauscaglia M (1988) The correlation of biochemical monitoring versus umbilical flow velocity measurements of the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:1081–1087

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tyrrell S, Obaid AH, Lilford RJ (1989) Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of fetal hypoxia and acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol 74:332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pardi G, Cetin I, Marconi AM et al (1993) Diagnostic value of blood sampling in fetuses with growth retardation. N Engl J Med 328:692–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vintzileos AM, Campbell W, Rodis J et al (1991) The relationship between fetal biophysical assessment, umbilical artery velocimetry, and fetal acidosis. Obstet Gynecol 77:622–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon BH, Syn HC, Kim SW (1992) The efficacy of Doppler umbilical velocimetry in identifying fetal acidosis: a comparison with fetal biophysical profile. J Ultrasound Med 11:1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoon BH, Romero R, Roh CR et al (1993) Relationship between the fetal biophysical profile score, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:1586–1594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bilardo CM, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S (1990) Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:115–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vyas S, Nicolaides KH, Bower S, Campbell S (1990) Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:797–803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiba Y, Murakami M (1992) Cerebral blood flow dynamics in fetus. No To Hattatsu 24:136–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Akalin-Sel T, Nicolaides KH, Peacock J, Campbell S (1994) Doppler dynamics and their complex interrelation with fetal oxygen pressure, carbon dioxide pressure, and pH in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 84:439–446

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C (1992) Changes of pulsatility index from fetal vessels preceding the onset of late decelerationin growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 79:605–611

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. James DK, Parker MJ, Smoleniec JS (1992) Comprehensive fetal assessment with three ultrasonographic characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1486–1491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ribbert LS, Visser GH, Mulder EJ, Zonneveld MF, Morssink LP (1993) Changes with time in fetal heart rate variation, movement incidences and haemodynamics in intrauterine growth retarded fetuses; a longitudinal approach to the assessment of fetal well being. Early Hum Dev 31:195–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, Penny B (1994) Central and peripheral hemodynamic changes in fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: correlation with computerized fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:509–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hecher K, Bilardo CM, Stigter RH et al (2001) Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:564–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Harman Cr (2001) The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:571–577

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maulik, D., Figueroa, R. (2005). Doppler Velocimetry for Fetal Surveillance: Adverse Perinatal Outcome and Fetal Hypoxia. In: Maulik, D. (eds) Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28903-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28903-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23088-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28903-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics