Skip to main content

Entangled States, EPR Paradox and Bell’s Inequality

  • Chapter
  • 2326 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • On the EPR problem: Quantum theory and measurement, edited by J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983); “The conceptual implications of quantum mechanics”, Workshop of the Hugot Foundation of the “Collège de France”, J. Physique 42, colloque C2 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964); see also J. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993). The inequality derived here is a modified version of Bell’s initial result, due to J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969). F. Laloë, “Do we really understand quantum mechanics?” Am. J. Phys. 69, 655 (2001). A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bennett, G. Brassard and A. Ekert, “Quantum cryptography”, Sci. Am., October 1992; R. Hughes and J. Nordholt, “Quantum cryptography takes the air”, Phys. World, May 1999, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lyod, “Quantum mechanical computers”, Sci. Am., November 1995, p. 44; S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, “Quantum computing: dream or nightmare”, Phys. Today, August 1996, p. 51; “Quantum information”, special issue of Phys.World, March 1998; N. Gershenfeld and I.L. Chuang, “Quantum computing with molecules”, Sci. Am., June 1998, p. 50; J. Preskill, “Battling decoherence: the fault-tolerant quantum computer”, Phys. Today, June 1999, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Physics of Quantum Information, D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, A. Zeilinger (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, M. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grangier, P. (2002). Entangled States, EPR Paradox and Bell’s Inequality. In: Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28805-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28805-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27706-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28805-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics