Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

MDA® pp 183–246Cite as

Koordination und Kombination

  • Chapter

  • 2076 Accesses

Part of the book series: Xpert.press ((XPERT.PRESS))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

eBook
USD   14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Kent Beck et al.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://agilemanifesto.org/ (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Günter Böckle, Peter Knauber, Klaus Pohl und Klaus Schmid (Hrsg.): Software-Produktlinien — Methoden, Einführung und Praxis. dpunkt, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barry W. Boehm: Anchoring the Software Process. USC CSE Technical Reports, 1995. http://sunset.usc.edu/publications/TECHRPTS/1995/usccse95-507/ASP.pdf (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jan Bosch: Software Product Lines — Organizational Alternatives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE′01), S. 91–100, IEEE Computer Society, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wikipedia: Computer-aided software engineering. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CASE (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ThoughtWorks Inc.: CruiseControl Home. http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/ (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wikipedia: Creeping featurism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creeping_featurism (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin Fowler und Matthew Foemmel: Continuous Integration. http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul Clemens und Linda Northrop: Software Product Lines — Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alistair Cockburn: Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alistair Cockburn: Crystal Clear — A Human-Powered Methodology for Small Teams. Addison-Wesley, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andy Cole: Runaway Projects — Cause and Effects. In: Software World, Volume 26, Number 3, S. 3–5, A. P. Publications, 1995.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wikipedia: Commercial off-the-shelf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COTS (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tom DeMarco: Slack — Getting Past Burnout, Busywork, and the Myth of Total Efficiency. Broadway Books, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tom DeMarco und Timothy Lister: Peopleware — Productive Projects and Teams, Second Edition. Dorset House, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eclipse.org: Eclipse.org Main Page. http://www.eclipse.org/ (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robert L. Glass: The Realities of Software Technology Payoffs. In: Communications of the ACM, Volume 42, Issue 2, S. 74–79, ACM, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Apache Software Foundation (ASF): The Apache Jakarta Project. http://jakarta.apache.org/ (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. JBoss Inc.: JBoss.com — The Professional Open Source Company. http://www.jboss.org/index.html (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Java Community Process: JSRs — Java Specification Requests — detail JSR# 12. http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=12 (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wing Lam und John A. McDermid: A summary of domain analysis experience by way of heuristics. In: Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Software reusability, S. 54–64, ACM, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bernd Oesterreich, Christian Weiss, Claudia Schröder, Tim Weilkiens und Alexander Lenhard: Objektorientierte Geschäftsprozessmodellierung mit der UML. dpunkt, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wikipedia: Proof of concept. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_concept (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sekørb Defla: Innovation considered harmful. In: Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on Innovative Software Engineering, S. 54–64, AB, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Object Management Group (OMG): Sofware Process Engineering Metamodel, Version 1.1. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/spem.htm (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robert C. Seacord, Daniel Plakosh und Grace A. Lewis: Modernizing Legacy Systems — Software Technologies, Engineering Processes, and Business Practices. Addison Wesley Professional, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eclipse.org: Eclipse Test & Performance Tools Platform. http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/index.html (letzter Abruf September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. The U2TP Consortium: U2TP — The UML Testing Profile. http://www.fokus.gmd.de/u2tp/ (letzter Abruf September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Object Management Group (OMG): MDA Specifications — UML Profiles. http://www.omg.org/mda/specs.htm#Profiles (letzter Abruf Mai 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gerhard Versteegen (Hrsg.): Software-Management. Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. David M. Weiss und Chi Tau Robert Lai: Software Product-Line Engineering — A Family-Based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Koordination und Kombination. In: MDA®. Xpert.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28746-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation