Abstract
When a tooth becomes decayed or fractured, an indirect restoration may be indicated to restore its functional and biological integrity. To reach that goal, special requirements have to be set for the properties of the cement used to retain the restoration.
Keywords
- Adhesive System
- Smear Layer
- Resin Cement
- Bond Strength Test
- Ceramic Restoration
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Pontius O, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endod 2002; 28:710–715
Webb EL, Straka WF, Phillips CL. Tooth crazing associated with threaded pins:a three-dimensional model. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:624–628
Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849–853
Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001:119–144
Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1212–1220
Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereira PN, Tagami J. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent 2001; 26:375–382
Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27:447–454
Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60:288–291
Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hotpressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2:305–313
Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers (see comments). J Dent Res 1989; 68:48–50
Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am 1983; 27:671–684
Calamia JR. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art. Quintessence Int 1985; 16:5–12
Kato H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:103–110
El Zohairy A, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A, Davidson CL. Long-term micro-tensile bond strength of resin cements bonded to CAD/CAM ceramic blocks. J Dent Res 2002; 81:380
al Edris A, al Jabr A, Cooley RL, Barghi N. SEM evaluation of etch patterns by three etchants on three porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:734–739
Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: an ultra-morphological FE-SEM examination of the adhesive interface. Dent Mater 1999; 15:105–119
El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 2005; 21:83–93
Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998; 23:250–257
Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater 2002; 18:380–388
Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a 4-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1171–1181
Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/ composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995; 74:381–387
Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT, Bowen RL. Bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic resin denture bases. J Am Dent Assoc 1967; 74:1018–1023
Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:464–470
Sato K, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of three-liquid bonding agents on bond strength to a machine-milled ceramic material. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26:570–574
Matsumura H, Kato H, Atsuta M. Shear bond strength to feldspathic porcelain of two luting cements in combination with three surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:511–517
Della Bona A, Northeast SE. Shear bond strength of resin bonded ceramic after different try-in procedures. J Dent 1994; 22:103–107
Barghi N. To silanate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21:659–662, 664; quiz 666
Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 2002; 18:179–188
Kern M, Strub JR. Bonding to alumina ceramic in restorative dentistry: clinical results over up to 5 years. J Dent 1998; 26:245–249
James DF, Yarovesky U. An esthetic inlay technique for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1983; 14:725–731
Wendt SL Jr. The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:351–356
Wendt SL Jr. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:265–271
DeSchepper EJ, Tate WH, Powers JM. Bond strength of resin cements to microfilled composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6:235–238
Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992; 8:193–196
Tate WH, DeSchepper EJ, Powers JM. Bond strength of resin cements to a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 1993; 6:195–198
Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Baresel J, Trapper T, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Effect of surface treatment on fatigue behaviour between Tetric Ceram inlays and Variolink luting composite. Clin Oral Investig 2001; 5:260–265
Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1993; 18:187–194
Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of a resin cement to a cured composite inlay material. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:189–193
Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16:265–273
Shono Y, Terashita M, Shimada J, Kozono Y, Carvalho RM, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Durability of resin-dentin bonds. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:211–218
Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin—resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater 2001; 17:268–276
Okuda M, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Relationship between nanoleakage and longterm durability of dentin bonds. Oper Dent 2001; 26:482–490
Okuda M, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of resin dentin interface: nanoleakage vs microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2002; 27:289–296
Takahashi A, Inoue S, Kawamoto C, Ominato R, Tanaka T, Sato Y, Pereira PN, Sano H. In vivo long-term durability of the bond to dentin using two adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:151–159
Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 1998; 19:503–508
Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:222–225
Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:241–245
Attar N, Onen A. Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:791–798
Swift EJ Jr. Fluoride release from two composite resins. Quintessence Int 1989; 20:895–897
Burke FJ, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:335–340
Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:823–831
Mitchell CA, Douglas WH, Cheng YS. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15:7–13
Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements. Am J Dent 2000; 13:77–80
Aberg CH, van Dijken JW, Olofsson AL. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:140–149
van Dijken JW, Horstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994; 22:265–272
van Dijken JW, Hoglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998; 26:219–225
Sindel J, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Crack formation of all-ceramic crowns dependent on different core build-up and luting materials. J Dent 1999; 27:175–181
Venhoven BA, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction and conversion of lightcuring BisGMA-based methacrylate resins. Biomaterials 1993; 14:871–875
Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:146–148
Hofmann N, Papsthart G, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin-based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28:1022–1028
Linden JJ, Swift EJ Jr, Boyer DB, Davis BK. Photo-activation of resin cements through porcelain veneers. J Dent Res 1991; 70:154–157
Foxton RM, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Durability of the dual-cure resin cement/ceramic bond with different curing strategies. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:49–59
Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 1998; 14:120–128
Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1998; 14:394–398
Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17:61–67
Øilo G, Austrheim EK. In vitro quality testing of dentin adhesives. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:263–269
Holtan JR, Nystrom GP, Olin PS, Phelps RA 2nd, Phillips JJ, Douglas WH. Bond strength of six dentinal adhesives. J Dent 1994; 22:92–96
Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997; 76:1298–1307
Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength: evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994; 10:236–240
Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:299–309
DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995; 11:126–131
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
El Zohairy, A., Feilzer, A. (2005). Bonding in Prosthodontics with Cements. In: Eliades, G., Watts, D., Eliades, T. (eds) Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23408-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28559-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)
