Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding pp 53–69Cite as

Bond Strength to Enamel

  • Chapter

  • 2008 Accesses

Abstract

The ability of the clinician to bond restorative materials to enamel has been an important achievement of modern dentistry. A variety of restorative materials that rely on enamel bonding are now available to the clinician. These materials include resin composites, compomers, hybrid ionomers, and glass ionomers.

Keywords

  • Bond Strength
  • Resin Composite
  • Restorative Material
  • Bonding Agent
  • Resin Cement

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Craig RG, Powers JM, eds. Restorative dental materials, 11th den. Mosby, St. Louis, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barakat MM, Powers JM. In vitro bond strength of cements to treated teeth. Aust Dent J 1986; 31:415–419

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:299–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Powers JM, O’Keefe KL, Kaaden C, Pinzon LM. Correlation of inverted cone tensile and microtensile bond strengths. Trans Soc Biomater (CD), vol. 24, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  5. Powers JM, Kim H-B, Turner DS. Orthodontic adhesives and bond strength testing. Semin Orthod 1997; 3:147–156

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Powers JM, Messersmith ML. Enamel etching and bond strength. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T, eds. Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, New York, 2001, pp 105–122

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hobson RS, Mcabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 2001; 17:184–189

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl K-H, Schmalz G. Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Oral Invest 2002; 6:155–160

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23:481–486

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 2002; 27:403–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanca J III. One Step bond to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 9:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strengths of “one-bottle” adhesives. Am Acad Pediatr Dent 1998; 20:259–262

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hannig M, Reinhardt K-J, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999; 24:172–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Farah JW, Powers JM, eds. Bonding agents. Dent Advis 2002; 19:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tate WH, You C, Powers JM. Bond strength of compomers to human enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25:283–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Powers JM, Turner DS, Nakano A. Bonding of hybrid ionomers to unetched enamel and orthodontic brackets. Abstr J Dent Res 1996; 75:173

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vuu TM, Chang JC, Pinzon LM, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching adhesive to human enamel and dentin. Abstr J Dent Res 2003; 82:564

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strattman R, Powers JM. Acidic primers utilized to bond orthodontic resins to enamel. Abstr J Dent Res 2001; 80:232

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koh SH, You C, Chan JT, Powers JM. Effect of fluoride treatment on bonding of sealants to enamel. Abstr J Dent Res 1997; 76:189

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999; 27:523–530

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15:32–42

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McGrory KR, Lecrone V, English JD, Powers JM. Bond strengths of orthodontic self-etching primers on ground enamel. Abstr J Dent Res 2003; 82:1195

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lecrone V, McGrory KR, English JD, Powers JM. Bond strengths of orthodontic self-etching primers to unground enamel. Abstr J Dent Res 2003; 82:1196

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:115–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie J, Flaitz CM, Hicks MJ, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to caries-like enamel lesions. Abstr J Dent Res 1995; 74:32

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roeder LB, Berry EA III, You C, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 1995; 20:186–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berry EA III, Berry L, Powers JM. Bonding of hybrid ionomer to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Abstr J Dent Res 1994; 73:183

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva DL, Rivera FG, Santana-Penin UA. Differences in bonding to acidetched or Er: YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:280–288

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Trajtenberg CP, Pereira PNR, Powers JM. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium: YAG laser. Trans Academy of Dental Materials, vol 15. Proc Conference on Scientific Criteria for Selecting Materials and Techniques in Clinical Dentistry, Siena, Italy, 25–27 October 2001, p. 171

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993; 9:295–299

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Powers JM, Finger WJ, Xie J. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthodont 1995; 4:28–32

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosa BT, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Ritter AV. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to oil-contaminated enamel. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12:139–145

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shukla BA, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength sensitivity of self-etching adhesive to application procedure. Abstr J Dent Res 2001; 80:61

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bishara SE, Vonwald L, Zamtua J, Damon PL. Effects of various methods of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114:150–153

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. Lai SCN, Tay FR, Cheung GSP, Mak YF, Carvalho RM, Wei SHY, Toledano M, Osorio R, Pashley DH. Reversal of compromised bonding in bleached enamel. J Dent Res 2002; 81:477–481

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1998; 29:211–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Horowitz HS, Heifetz SB, Poulsen S. Retention and effectiveness of a single application of an adhesive sealant in preventing occlusal caries: final report after five years of a study in Kalispell, Montana. 1977: 95:1133–1139

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vrbi V. Retention of a fluoride-containing sealant on primary and permanent teeth 3 years after placement. Quintessence Int 1999; 30:825–828

    Google Scholar 

  39. Warren DP, Infante NB, Rice HC, Turner SD, Chan JT. Effect of topical fluoride on retention of pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Hyg 2001; 75:21–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Calderone JJ, Davis JM. The New Mexico sealant program: a progress report. J Public Health Dent 1987; 47:145–149

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sterritt GR, Frew RA. Evaluation of a clinic-based sealant program. J Public Health Dent 1988; 48:220–224

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Romcke RG, Lewis DW, Maze BD, Vickerson RA. Retention and maintenance of fissure sealants over 10 years. J Can Dent Assoc 1990; 56:235–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Whyte RJ, Leake JL, Howley TP. Two-year follow-up of 11,000 dental sealants in first permanent molars in the Saskatchewan Health Dental Plan. J Public Health Dent 1987; 47:177–181

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Raadal M, Laegreid O, Laegreid KV, Hveem H, Korsgaard EK, Wangen K. Fissure sealing of permanent first molars in children receiving a high standard of prophylactic care Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1984; 47:145–149

    Google Scholar 

  45. Forss H, Saarni U-M, Seppä L. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22:21–24

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. Houpt M, Shey Z. The effectiveness of a fissure sealant after 6 years. Pediatr Dent 1983; 5:104–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001; 29:298–301

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  48. Going RE, Haugh LD, Grainger DA, Conti AJ. Four-year clinical evaluation of a pit and fissure sealant. Am Dent J 1977; 95:972–981

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  49. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Della-Giustina VE, Brooks JE, Williams JE, Fairhurst CW. A comparative study of two pit and fissure sealants: results after 4 years in Augusta, Ga. Am Dent J 1981; 103:235–238

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  50. Meurman JH, Helminen SK, Luoma H. Caries reduction over 5 years from a single application of a fissure sealant. Scand J Dent Res 1978; 86:153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of a single application of white sealant after 10 years. Am Dent J 1987; 115:31–36

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  52. Heidmann J, Poulsen S, Mathiassen F. Evaluation of a fissure sealing programme in a Danish Public Child Dental Service. Comm Dent Health 1990; 7:379–388

    Google Scholar 

  53. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. Am Dent J 1991; 122:34–42

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  54. Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D. On the retention and effectiveness of fissure sealant in permanent molars after 15–20 years: a cohort study. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001; 29:302–307

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  55. Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 393–414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pereira AC, Basting RT, Pinelli C, de Castro Meneghim M, Werner CW. Retention and caries prevention of Vitremer and Ketac-bond used as occlusal sealants. Am Dent J 1999; 12:62–64

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pereira AC, Pardi V, Mialhe FL, Meneghim MC, Basting RT, Werner CW. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin used as a fissure sealant. Am Dent J 2000; 13:294–296

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ganss C, Klimek J, Gleim A. One-year clinical evaluation of the retention and quality of two fluoride releasing sealants. Clin Oral Invest 1999; 3:188–193

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  59. Hughes TJ, Kerr SD, Powers JM. Clinical study of the effect of no prophylaxis and reduced etching time on bond strength. J Clin Orthod 2003; 37:99–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Asgari S, Salas A, English J, Powers J. Clinical evaluation of bond failure rates with a new self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36:687–689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J.M. Powers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W.H. Tate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, 2 Thivon Street, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece

    George Eliades DDS, Dr. Dent.

  2. Biomaterials Research Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK

    David Watts PhD, DSc, FADM

  3. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Theodore Eliades DDS, MS, Dr.Med., PhD, FADM

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Powers, J., Tate, W. (2005). Bond Strength to Enamel. In: Eliades, G., Watts, D., Eliades, T. (eds) Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23408-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28559-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

search

Navigation