Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding pp 3–33Cite as

Etched Enamel Structure and Topography: Interface with Materials

  • Chapter

Abstract

Experiments on bonding of acrylic resins to enamel and dentine began in the early 1950s in England with Dr. Oskar Hagger. He developed a monomer based on glycerophosphoric acid dimethacrylate that was chemically cured with sulphinic acid [1].

Keywords

  • Glass Ionomer Cement
  • Smear Layer
  • Resin Cement
  • Hybrid Layer
  • Prismatic Enamel

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hagger O. New catalyst for polymerization of ethylene at room temperature. Helv Chem Acta 1948; 31:1624–1631 [in German]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kramer IRH, McLean JW. Alterations in the staining reaction of dentine resulting from a constituent of a new self-polymerizing resin. Br Dent J 1952; 93:150

    Google Scholar 

  3. McLean JW, Kramer IRH. A clinical and pathologic evaluation of a sulfinic acid activated resin for use in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 1952; 93:255–269

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849–853

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Retief DH. A comparative study of three etching solutions: effects on enamel surface and adhesive-enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil 1975; 2:75–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meola MT, Papaccio G. A scanning electron microscope study of the effect of etching time and mechanical pre-treatment on the pattern of acid etching on the enamel of primary teeth. Int Dent J 1986; 36:49–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simonsen RJ. Fissure sealants: deciduous molar retention of colored sealant with variable etch time. Quintessence Int 1978; 9:71–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eidelman E, Shapira J, Houpt M. The retention of fissure sealants using twenty-second etching time. ASDC J Dent Child 1984; 51:422–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Hussey DL, Mitchell CA. Bonding to molars: the effect of etch time (an in vitro study). Eur J Orthod 1998; 20:195–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner A, Hobson R. Variations in acid-etch patterns with different acids and etch times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120:64–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 1968; 13:61–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brännström M, Malmgren O, Nordenvall KJ. Etching of young permanent teeth with an acid gel. Am J Orthod 1982; 82:379–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on enamel depth of etch: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 98:154–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Mudgil A, Levine A. Effects of etching time on enamel bond strengths. Am J Dent 1993; 6:302–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pashley DH. The effects of acid-etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992; 17:229–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beech DR, Jalaly T. Bonding of polymers to enamel: influence of deposits formed during etching, etching time and period of water immersion. J Dent Res 1980; 59:1156–1162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strengths with various etching times. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:47–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shinchi MJ, Soma K, Nakabayashi N. The effect of phosphoric acid concentration on resin tag length and bond strength of a photo-cured resin to acid-etched enamel. Dent Mater 2000; 16:324–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon IL, Fejerskov O. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res 1975; 9:373–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Asmussen E. Penetration of restorative resins into acid etched enamel. I. Viscosity, surface tension and contact angle of restorative resin monomers. Acta Odontol Scand 1977; 35:175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Busscher HJ, Retief DH, Arends J. Relationship between surface-free energies of dental resins and bond strengths to etched enamel. Dent Mater 1987; 3:60–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Uno S, Finger WJ. Effect of acid etchant composition and etch duration on enamel loss and resin composite bonding. Am J Dent 1995; 8:165–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: an SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 110:329–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien JA III, Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denys FR. Effects of saliva contamination and phosphoric acid composition on bond strength. Dent Mater 1987; 3:296–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tandon S, Kumari R, Udupa S. The effect of etch-time on the bond strength of a sealant and on the etch-pattern in primary and permanent enamel: an evaluation. ASDC J Dent Child 1989; 56:186–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakabayashi N, Takeyama M, Kojima K, Mogi M, Miura F, Masuhara E. Studies on dental self-curing resins (22) – adhesion of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to enamel. J Jpn Soc Dent Appar Mater 1982; 23:88–92

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee HL Jr. Adhesion between living tissue and plastics. I. Adhesion of epoxy and polyurethane resins to dentin and enamel. J Biomed Mater Res 1969; 3:349–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nygaard VK, Simmelink JW. Ultrastructural study of the resin infiltration zone in acid-treated human enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1978; 23:1151–1156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol 1967; 12:1615–1620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakabayashi N, Takeyama M, Kojima K, Masuhara E. Studies on dental self-curing resins (20) — adhesion mechanism of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to dentine. J Jpn Soc Dent Appar Mater 1982; 23:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, Iwaku M. Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res 1979; 58:1364–1370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bertolotti RL. Total etch: the rational dentin bonding protocol. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46:277–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3:237–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17:296–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001; 17:430–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110:464–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Peters MC. Adhesive permeability affects composite coupling to dentin treated with a self-etch adhesive. Oper Dent 2003; 28:612–623

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, Goracci C,Monticelli F,Yiu C, Huang C, Prati C, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives J Dent Res 2004; 83:459–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Boyde A, Switsur VR, Steward ADG. An assessment of two new physical methods applied to the study of dental tissues. In: Hardwick JL et al. Advances in fluorine research and dental caries prevention, vol 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1963, pp 185–193

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eick JD, Wilko RA, Anderson CH, Sorensen SE. Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res 1970; 49(Suppl):1359–1368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tao L, Pashley DH, Boyd L. Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. Dent Mater 1988; 4:208–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Interfacial ultrastructure of the resin-enamel region of three adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1998; 11:13–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent 1984; (Suppl 3):13–29

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pashley DH. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88(Suppl 1):215–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pashley DH, Michelich V, Kehl T. Dentin permeability: effects of smear layer removal. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46:531–537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Glantz PO. The effect of EDTA-containing surface-active solutions on the morphology of prepared dentin: an in vivo study. J Dent Res 1980; 59:1127–1131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater 2002; 18:454–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gwinnett AJ. Smear layer: morphological considerations. Oper Dent 1984 3(Suppl):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pashley DH, Tao L, Boyd L, King GE, Horner JA. Scanning electron microscopy of the substructure of smear layers in human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1988; 33:265–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2:83–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pashley DH, Horner JA, Brewer PD. Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent 1992; 5 (Suppl):137–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Spencer P, Wang Y, Walker MP, Swafford JR. Molecular structure of acid-etched dentin smear layers: in situ study. J Dent Res 2001; 80:1802–1807

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: solubility of dentinal smear layer in dilute acid buffers. Int Dent J 1978; 28:97–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2:99–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pahlavan A, Dennison JB, Charbeneau GT. Penetration of restorative resins into acid-etched human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1976: 93:1170–1176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Low T, Lee KW, Fraunhofer JA von. The adaptation of composite materials to etched enamel surfaces. J Oral Rehabil 1978; 5:349–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Voss JE, Charbeneau GT. A scanning electron microscope comparison of three methods of bonding resin to enamel rod ends and longitudinally cut enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98:384–389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. ten Cate JM, Keizer S, Arends J. Polymer adhesion to enamel. The influence of viscosity and penetration. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4:149–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. O’Brien KD, Watts DC, Read MJ. Light cured direct bonding: Is it necessary to use a primer? Eur J Orthod 1991; 13:22–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tang AT, Bjorkman L, Adamczak E, Andlin-Sobocki A, Ekstrand J. In vitro shear bond strength of orthodontic bondings without liquid resin. Acta Odontol Scand 2000; 58:44–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schaneveldt S, Foley TF. Bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:267–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Dincer B, Hazar S, Sen BH. Scanning electron microscope study of the effects of soft drinks on etched and sealed enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:135–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16:265–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Donly KJ, Ruiz M. In vitro demineralization inhibition of enamel caries utilizing an unfilled resin. Clin Prev Dent 1992; 14:22–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Frazier MC, Southard TE, Doster PM. Prevention of enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment: an in vitro study using pit and fissure sealants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110:459–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. García-Godoy F, Summitt JB, Donly KJ. Caries progression of white spot lesions sealed with an unfilled resin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997; 21:141–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Protective effects of resin impregnation on demineralization of enamel. Am J Dent 1999; 12:315–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Tantbirojn D, Rozzi SM, Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL, Douglas WH. In vitro inhibition of enamel demineralization by a polymerizable amphiphilic film. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108:564–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Gray GB, Shellis P. Infiltration of resin into white spot caries-like lesions of enamel: an in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002; 10:27–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kuhar M, Cevc P, Schara M, Funduk N. In vitro permeability and scanning electron microscopy study of acid-etched and ground enamel surfaces protected with dental adhesive coating. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26:722–730

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Foliart R. Effects of adhesion promoters on resin-enamel retention. J Dent Res 1979; 58:1371–1376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hotta K, Mogi M, Miura F, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 4-MET on bond strength and penetration of monomers into enamel. Dent Mater 1992; 8:173–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gunadi G, Nakabayashi N. Preparation of an effective light-cured bonding agent for orthodontic application. Dent Mater 1997; 13:7–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strengths of “one-bottle” adhesives. Pediatr Dent 1998; 20:259–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000; 25:11–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kanca J. Improved bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123:35–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to moist enamel. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:103–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Walls AW, Lee J, McCabe JF. The bonding of composite resin to moist enamel. Br Dent J 2001; 191:148–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Moll K, Gartner T, Haller B. Effect of moist bonding on composite/enamel bond strength. Am J Dent 2002; 15:85–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr. Bond strengths of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 1992; 5:318–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Zaikov GE, Iordanskii AL, Markin VS (1988). Diffusion of electrolytes in polymers. VSP BV (formerly VNU Science Press BV): Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp 48–70

    Google Scholar 

  83. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: an ultra-morphological FE-SEM examination of the adhesive interface. Dent Mater 1999; 15:105–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999; 27:523–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:115–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kodaka T, Mori R, Miyakawa M. Sequential observations followed by acid etching on the enamel surfaces of human teeth under scanning electron microscopy at low vacuum. Microsc Res Tech 1993; 24:429–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of enamel pretreatments on bond strength of compomer. Dent Mater 2001; 17:402–408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Jongebloed WL, Molenaar I, Arends J. Morphology and size-distribution of sound and acid-treated enamel crystallites. Calcif Tissue Res 1975; 19:109–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Daculsi G, LeGeros RZ, Mitre D. Crystal dissolution of biological and ceramic apatites. Calcif Tissue Int 1989; 45:95–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Hosoya Y, Goto G. Effects of cleaning, polishing pretreatments and acid etching times on unground primary enamel. J Pedod 1990; 14:84–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Hosoya Y, Tominaga A. A comparison of five adhesive systems to primary enamel. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21:46–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 2002; 27:403–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Schmitt DC, Lee J. Microleakage of adhesive resin systems in the primary and permanent dentitions. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24:587–593

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, Dörfer C. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:23–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:333–341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Gillet D, Nancy J, Dupuis V, Dorignac G. Microleakage and penetration depth of three types of materials in fissure sealant: self-etching primer vs etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26:175–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:621–624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Korbmacher H, Klocke A, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Enamel conditioning for orthodontic bonding with a single-step bonding agent. J Orofac Orthop 2002; 63;463–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Velo S, Carano A, Carano A. Self-etching vs traditional bonding systems in orthodontics: an in vitro study. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002; 5:166–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Carstensen W. Effect of reduction of phosphoric acid concentration on the shear bond strength of brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108: 274–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 1998; 26:609–616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Sinhoreti MA. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent 1999; 12:181–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999; 24:172–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ. Self-etching primers: an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique? J Orofac Orthop 2001; 62:238–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Hayakawa T, Nemoto K. Efficacy of self-etching primers in the adhesion of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement to enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:105–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Perdigão J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997; 10:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems. Oper Dent 2000; 25:75–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:528–533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002; 18:269–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17:122–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1706–1715

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 1998; 14:99–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27:447–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Moura SK. Microleakage of four simplified adhesive systems under thermal and mechanical stresses. Am J Dent 2002; 15:164–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Oral Investig 2002; 6:155–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent 2003; 28:20–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1396–1399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999; 78:898–905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Miyazaki S, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 2001; 14:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  120. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27:88–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Effects of agitation of self-etching primers/adhesives on resin-dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 2003; 16:340–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Kugel G, Perry RD, Hoang E, Hoang T, Ferrari M. Dyract compomer: comparison of total etch vs no etch technique. Gen Dent 1998; 46:604–606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Manhart J, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Bond strength of a compomer to dentin under various surface conditions. Clin Oral Investig 1999; 3:175–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Luo Y, Tay FR, Lo EC, Wei SH. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods. J Dent 2000; 28:495–500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Tate WH, You C, Powers JM. Bond strength of compomers to human enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25:283–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Goracci C, Ferrari M, Grandini S, Monticelli F, Tay FR. Bonding of a self-adhesive resin cement to dental hard tissues. J Adhes Dent (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  127. Cowan AJ, Wilson NH, Wilson MA, Watts DC. The application of ESEM in dental materials research. J Dent 1996; 24:375–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Alster D, Venhoven BA, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of compliance of the substrate materials on polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers. Biomaterials 1997; 18:337–341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989; 68:48–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991; 70:880–882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Verzijden CW, Feilzer AJ, Creugers NH, Davidson CL. The influence of polymerization shrinkage of resin cements on bonding to metal. J Dent Res 1992; 71:410–413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20:963–971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Kuijs R, Burgersdijk RC. Necessity of bevels for box only class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:274–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Hoelscher DC, Gregory WA, Linger JB, Pink FE. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13:171–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Arnold RW, Combe EC, Warford JH Jr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 274–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Yamada R, Hayakawa T, Kasai K. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2002; 558–564

    Google Scholar 

  137. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a fluoride-releasing self-etch acidic primer on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2002; 72:199–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Denehy G. The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self-etch primer. Angle Orthod 2002; 72:554–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Tay FR, Lai CNS, Chersoni S, Pashley DH, Mak YF, Suppa P, Prati C, King NM. Osmotic blistering in enamel bonded with one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2004; 83:296–301

    Google Scholar 

  140. Watson TF, Pagliari D, Sidhu SK, Naasan MA. Confocal microscopic observation of structural changes in glass-ionomer cements and tooth interfaces. Biomaterials 1998; 19:581–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Ngo H, Mount GJ, Peters MC. A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscopic technique. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:63–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Sidhu SK, Sherriff M, Watson TF. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1495–1501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Palaghias G. An FTIR study on the setting mechanism of resin-modified glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater 1996; 12:173–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Small IC, Watson TF, Chadwick AV, Sidhu SK. Water sorption in resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro comparison with other materials. Biomaterials 1998; 19:545–550

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Gordan VV. Effect of conditioning times on resin-modified glass-ionomer bonding. Am J Dent 2000; 13:13–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000; 79:709–714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Sennou HE, Lebugle AA, Grégoire GL. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the dentin-glass ionomer cement interface. Dent Mater 1999; 15:229–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Cortes O, García-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993; 6:299–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Desai M, Tyas MJ. Adhesion to enamel of light-cured poly-acid dental materials. Aust Dent J 1996; 41:393–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Bishara SE, Vonwald L, Laffoon JF, Jakobsen JR. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118:288–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Arweiler NB, Auschill TM, Reich E. Does pretreatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glass-ionomer cements? J Adhes Dent 2000; 2:289–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Cimmino A, Tyas MJ. The evaluation of four conditioners for glass ionomer cements using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. J Dent 2001; 29:131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Attin T, Buchalla W, Hellwig E. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:29–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25:51–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28:215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. F.R. Tay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D.H. Pashley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, 2 Thivon Street, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece

    George Eliades DDS, Dr. Dent.

  2. Biomaterials Research Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK

    David Watts PhD, DSc, FADM

  3. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Theodore Eliades DDS, MS, Dr.Med., PhD, FADM

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tay, F., Pashley, D. (2005). Etched Enamel Structure and Topography: Interface with Materials. In: Eliades, G., Watts, D., Eliades, T. (eds) Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23408-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28559-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

search

Navigation