Skip to main content

Game situations

  • Chapter
  • 1011 Accesses

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ania, A.B., Trôger, T., and Wambach, A. (2002): An evolutionary analysis of insurance markets with adverse selection, Games and Economic Behavior, 40, 153–184.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. and Brandenburger, A. (1995): Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium, Econometrica, 63(5), 1161–80.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984): The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R. and Mosteller, F. (1955): Stochastic Models for Learning, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durieu, J. and Solal, P. (2002): Adaptive play with spatial sampling, Games and Economic Behavior, 43(2), 189–195.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. (1998): The Theory of Learning in Games, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C. (1967): Game with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, Management Science, 159–82, 320–34, 486–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C. and Selten, R. (1988): A general theory of equilibrium selection in games, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E. and Lehrer, E. (1993): Rational learning leads to Nash equilibrium, Econometrica, 61, 1019–1045.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kandori, M., Mailath, G., and Rob, R. (1993): Learning, mutation and long run equilibria in games, Econometrica, 61, 27–56.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. (1995): Learning in oligopoly: theory, simulation and experimental evidence, in A. Kirman and M. Salmon (eds.), Learning and rationality in economics, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F., Topol, R., and Walliser, B. (2001): A behavioral learning process in games, Games and Economic Behavior, 37, 340–366.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F. and Walliser, B. (2004): A reinforcement learning process in extensive form games, International Journal of Game Theory, 33, 219–227.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982): Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monderer, D. and Shapley, L. (1966): Fictitious Play property for games with identical interests, Journal of Economic Theory, 68, 258–265.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Monderer, D. and Shapley, L. (1996): Potential games, Games and Economic Behavior, 14, 124–143.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1951): Non cooperative games, Annals of Mathematics, 54, 289–93.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nöldeke, G. and Samuelson, L. (1993): An evolutionary analysis of backward and forward induction, Games and Economic Behavior, 5, 425–454.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944): Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1951): An iterative method of solving a game, Annals of Mathematics, 54, 296–301.

    CrossRef  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, A. and Vega-Redondo, F. (1996): Efficient equilibrium selection in evolutionary games with random matching, Journal of Economic Theory, 70, 65–92.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roth A. and Erev, I. (1995): Learning in extensive form games: experimental dataand simple dynamic models in the intermediate term, Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 164–212.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1994): Models of bounded rationality, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, L. (1997): Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (1996): Evolution of the Social Contract, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Redondo, F. (1996): Evolution, Games and Economic Behavior, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Redondo, F. (1997): The evolution of Walrasian behavior, Econometrica, 65, 375–84.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, B. (1998): A spectrum of equilibration processes in game theory, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8, 67–87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. (1995): Evolutionary Game Theory, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1993a): The evolution of conventions, Econometrica, 61:57–84.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1993b): An evolutionary model of bargaining, Journal of Economic Theory, 59, 145–168.

    CrossRef  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1998) Individual Strategy and Social Stucture, an Evolutionary Theory of Institutions, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Game situations. In: Evolutionary Microeconomics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28537-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics