Advertisement

Identification of Marine Microalgae by Neural Network Analysis of Simple Descriptors of Flow Cytometric Pulse Shapes

  • M. F. Wilkins
  • L. Boddy
  • G. B. J. Dubelaar

21.5 Conclusions

The use of AFC pulse shape information does improve discrimination of microalgal taxa, and is likely to be even more useful when species that form chains are to be discriminated. The use of RBF ANNs was again shown to be a rapid and useful tool for analysing large sets of high dimensional data.

Keywords

Discrete Cosine Transformation Pulse Shape Radial Basis Function Neural Network Radial Basis Function Network Discriminatory Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balfoort HW, Snoek J, Smits JRM, Breedveld LW, Hofstraat JW, Ringelberg J (1992) Automatic identification of algae: neural network analysis of flow cytometric data. J. Plankton Res. 14, 575–589Google Scholar
  2. Boddy L, Morris CW, Wilkins MF, Tarran GA, Burkill PH (1994) Neural network analysis of flow cytometric data for 40 marine phytoplankton species. Cytometry 15, 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boddy L, Morris CW, Wilkins MF, Al-Haddad L, Tarran GA, Jonker RR, Burkill PH (2000) Identification of 72 phytoplankton species by radial basis function neural network analysis of flow cytometric data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 195, 47–59Google Scholar
  4. Burkill PH, Mantoura RFC (1990) The rapid analysis of single marine cells by flow cytometry. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A333, 99–112Google Scholar
  5. Chen S, Cowan CFN, Grant PM (1991) Orthogonal least-squares learning algorithm for radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2, 302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubelaar GBJ, Gerritzen PL, Beeker AER, Jonker RR, Tangen K (1999) Design and first results of CytoBuoy: a wireless flow cytometer for in situ analysis of marine and fresh waters. Cytometry 137, 247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubelaar GBJ, Gerritzen PL (2000) CytoBuoy: a step forward towards using flow cytometry in Operational Oceanography. Scientia Marina (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Frankel DS, Olson RJ, Frankel SL, Chisholm SW (1989) Use of a neural net computer system for analysis of flow cytometric data of phytoplankton populations. Cytometry 10, 540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankel DS, Frankel SL, Binder BJ, Vogt RF (1996) Application of neural networks to flow cytometry data analysis and real-time cell classification. Cytometry 23, 290–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu LM (1994) Neural Networks in Computer Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Godavarti M, Rodriguez JJ, Yopp TA, Lambert GM, Galbraith DW (1996) Automated particle classification based on digital acquisition and analysis of flow cytometric pulse waveforms. Cytometry 24, 330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Maxwell Macmillan International, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hush DR, Horne BG (1993) Progress in supervised neural networks-what’s new since Lippmann? IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag. 10, 8–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joliffe IT (1986) Principal components analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonker RR, Meulemans JT, Dubelaar GBJ, Wilkins MF, Ringelberg J (1995) Flow cytometry: a powerful tool in analysis of biomass distributions in phytoplankton. Water Sci. Technol. 32, 177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lippmann RP (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc. Mag. 4, 4–22Google Scholar
  17. Morris CW, Boddy L, Allman R (1992) Identification of basidiomycete spores by neural network analysis of flow cytometry data. Mycol. Res. 96, 697–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morris CW, Boddy L (1996) Classification as unknown by RBF networks: discriminating phytoplankton taxa from flow cytometry data. In: Dagli, C.H., Akay, M., Chen, C.L.P., Fernandez, B.R., Ghosh, J. (Editors), Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, vol. 6. ASME Press, New York, pp 629–634Google Scholar
  19. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipies in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, 994 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Smits JRM, Breedveld LW, Derksen MWJ, Kateman G, Balfoort HW, Snoek J, Hofstraat JW (1992) Pattern classification with artificial neural networks: classification of algae, based upon flow cytometer data. Anal. Chim Acta 258, 11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilkins MF, Boddy L, Morris CW, Jonker R (1996) A comparison of some neural and nonneural methods for identification of phytoplankton from flow cytometry data. CABIOS 12, 9–18Google Scholar
  22. Wilkins MF, Morris CW, Boddy L (1994) A comparison of radial basis function and backpropagation neural networks for identification of marine phytoplankton from multivariate flow cytometry data. CABIOS 10, 285–294Google Scholar
  23. Wilkins MF, Boddy L, Morris CW, Jonker RR (1999) Identification of phytoplankton from flow cytometry data using radial basis function neural networks. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 65, 4404–4410Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Wilkins
    • 1
  • L. Boddy
    • 1
  • G. B. J. Dubelaar
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiff School of BiosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Dubelaar Research Instruments Engineering (DRIE)BodegravenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations