The impacts of globalization on the urban spatial-economic system in Korea

  • Sang-Chuel Choe
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


This chapter discusses trends in Korean urbanization during the era of increasing globalization. Much of the earlier globalization bypassed Korea except in the sense that its industrial growth was propelled forward by export expansion. More recently, however, Korea has had to face the impacts of globalization on the internal dynamics of the Korean economy and its cities: trade liberalization, market opening and foreign direct investment. This has resulted in severe adjustment problems in terms of economic structure (the transition to high-order services has probably been too slow) and the urban hierarchy (reinforcing the larger cities, especially the Seoul metropolitan region). There are opportunities and goals, e.g. to attract global events (in sports and culture) and to build up Seoul as the symbolic land bridge linking China and Japan. However, the government has not yet developed a viable trade-off between the dispersal policies aimed at achieving balanced regional development and the implicit spatial consequences (benefiting the larger cities) of accommodating globalization.


Foreign Direct Investment Capital Region World City Industrial Restructuring Korean Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Choe S-C (1996) The evolving urban system in Northeast Asia. In: Lo F-c; Yang Y-m (eds) Emerging world cities in Pacific Asia. United Nations University, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Region) (2000) European spatial planning and urban-rural relationship: The UK dimension. DETR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Dieleman F, Faludi A (1998) Polynucleated metropolitan regions in Northwest Europe: Theme of the special issues. European Planning Studies 6(4): 365–377Google Scholar
  4. Douglass M (1998) Globalization and extended metropolitan regions in Pacific Asia. Paper at the workshop on comparative policy framework for managing the expansion of the extended metropolitan regions in Pacific Asia, Bellagio, Italy, May 27–June 2Google Scholar
  5. Friedmann J (1995) Where we stand: a decade of world city research. In: Knox P, Taylor P (eds) World cities in world system. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujita K (1991) A world city and flexible specialization: restructuring of the Tokyo metropolis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 15: 269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ginsberg N, Koppel B, McGee T (1991) The extended metropolis: Settlement transition in Asia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  8. Hong SW (1997) Building a power house. KRIHS, AnyangGoogle Scholar
  9. Hwang M-I (1995) The status of unregistered factories and improvement measures. Planning Information Bulletin, pp 34–41 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  10. Kim WB (2005) National competitiveness and governance of the capital region of Seoul, Korea. Environment and Planning A (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  11. Kim WB (1995) Patterns of industrial restructuring. In: Clark GL, Kim WB (eds) Asian NIEs and the global economy: Industrial restructuring and corporate strategy in the 1990s. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim WB, Kwon YS, Lee YA (1997) Strategies for local competitiveness of large cities. KRIHS, Kyonggi, South KoreaGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee BS (1998) Land use regulations and efficiency of Seoul’s economy. International Journal of Urban Sciences 2: 48–72zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Lim JD (1996) Pusan, Korea: second-city blues. In: Clark GL, Kim WB (eds) Asian NIEs and the global economy: Industrial restructuring and corporate strategy in the 1990s. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. McGee T, Pang X, Shin D-H (1999) From corridor to intercity networks: The role of emerging urban system in building regional networks in Northeast. The Korean Journal of Regional Science 15(2): 21–38Google Scholar
  16. Mills ES, Hamilton BW (1984) Urban economics, 3rd ed. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  17. Moomaw RL (1988) Agglomeration economies; localization or urbanization? Urban Studies 25: 150–161Google Scholar
  18. Park SO (1995) Seoul, Korea: city and suburbs. In: Clark GL, Kim WB (eds) Asian NIEs and the global economy: Industrial restructuring and corporate strategy in the 1990s. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Sassen S (1991) The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott AJ (1996) Regional motors of the global economy. Futures 28: 391–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Todaro MP (1969) A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. American Economic Review 59: 138–148Google Scholar
  22. Yang Y-m (ed) (1998) Urban development in Asia: Retrospect and Prospect. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang-Chuel Choe
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations