Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 396 Accesses

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Taylor (2003:1).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor (2003:3).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Business Week (September 23, 2002:14).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ward (2003:224).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gladwin et al. (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Newing (2003:6).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Berle and Means (1932), Jensen and Meckling (1976), Eisenhardt (1989) and Aguilera and Jackson (2003:448ff).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Implying that some of the incentive systems in common use do not generate the alignment between principals and agents for which they were supposedly designed (Brecht et al, 2002:47).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frey (2003:4).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aquilera and Jackson (2003:448).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Hung (1998:105).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daily and Canella (2003:376).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Davis et al (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Aoki (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hung (1998:105).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boxall (1992:60).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boxall (1992:75).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Aoki (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Fiedler (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Davis et al (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Neuberger (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Hillman et al. (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Jensen and Meckling (1976), Fama and Jensen (1983), Eisenhardt (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Freeman (1984) and for example, Donaldson and Preston (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cadbury (1992:1).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Demb and Neubauer (1992:187).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shleifer and Vishny (1997:737).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Daily and Canella (2003:371).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weick (1979:95).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maleztke (1972:1515).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koenig (1967:7).

    Google Scholar 

  32. McQuail (1973:83).

    Google Scholar 

  33. The graphical model of this idea is intended as more than a simple analogy. It should demonstrate “the key structure of the system under study” (Beer, 1981:75).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Introduction. In: New Corporate Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28168-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics