Skip to main content

Credit Scoring Using Global and Local Statistical Models

  • Conference paper
Classification — the Ubiquitous Challenge

Abstract

This paper compares global and local statistical models that are used for the analysis of a complex data set of credit risks. The global model for discriminating clients with good or bad credit status depending on various customer attributes is based on logistic regression. In the local model, unsupervised learning algorithms are used to identify clusters of customers with homogeneous behavior. Afterwards, a model for credit scoring can be applied separately in the identified clusters. Both methods are evaluated with respect to practical constraints and asymmetric cost functions. It can be shown that local models are of higher discriminatory power which leads to more transparent and convincing decision rules for credit assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ARMINGER, G. et al. (1997): Analyzing Credit Risk Data: A Comparison of Logistic Discrimination, Classification Tree Analysis, and Feedforward Networks. Computational Statistics, 12, 293–310.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • BACHER, J. (1996): Clusteranalyse. 2. Aufl. Oldenbourg, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • BONNE, T. (2000): Kostenorientierte Klassifikationsanalyse. Eul, Lohmar.

    Google Scholar 

  • HASTIE, T., TIBSHIRANI, R. and FRIEDMAN, J. (2001): The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOHONEN, T. (1982): Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 59–69.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • KOHONEN, T. (1984): Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOHONEN, T. (1995): Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOHONEN, T. (1998): The SOM Methodology. In: G. Deboeck and T. Kohonen (Eds.): Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, London, 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • PODDIG, T. and SIDOROVITCH, I. (2001): Künstliche Neuronale Netze: Überblick, Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Anwendungsprobleme. In: H. Hippner et al. (Eds.): Handbuch Data Mining im Marketing. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 363–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHMITT, B. and DEBOECK, G. (1998): Differential Patterns in Consumer Purchase Preferences using Self-Organizing Maps: A Case Study of China. In: G. Deboeck. and T. Kohonen (Eds.): Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, London, 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schwarz, A., Arminger, G. (2005). Credit Scoring Using Global and Local Statistical Models. In: Weihs, C., Gaul, W. (eds) Classification — the Ubiquitous Challenge. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28084-7_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics