Are deep-water corals important habitats for fishes?

  • Peter J. Auster
Part of the Erlangen Earth Conference Series book series (ERLANGEN)


High densities of fishes in aggregations of deep-water corals (e.g., of the genera Primnoa, Paragorgia, Paramuricea) do not necessarily indicate that corals are important habitats in terms of population processes. Frequency dependent distribution models provide a basis for assessing the role of deep-water corals. It is necessary to understand the overall habitat-related distributions of fish species, at particular life history stages, in order to assess the particular role of corals. Examining the landscape for ecologically equivalent habitats is one approach for assessing the importance of coral habitats. Measures of the functional equivalence of habitats are demonstrated, as an example, for sites from the Gulf of Maine on the northeast United States continental shelf. Fish census data based on surveys with a remotely operated vehicle in 2003 showed that communities in habitats dominated by dense corals and dense epifauna were functionally equivalent when compared with five other less complex habitats (e.g., boulder with sparse coral cover). Comparison of species-individual curves showed that sites with dense coral and dense epifauna habitats supported only moderate levels of fish diversity when compared with other sites. Further, density of Acadian redfish (Sebastes fasciatus) in dense coral and dense epifauna habitats, where this species was dominant, was not statistically different but was higher than an outcrop-boulder habitat with sparse epifauna (the only other site where this species was abundant). Such data suggest that coral habitats are not necessarily unique but have attributes similar to other important habitats. However, the level of their importance in the demography of fish populations and communities remains to be demonstrated. Focusing conservation efforts for deep-water corals on their perceived value to exploited species, without good demographic information on fish populations, may ultimately leave corals open to destructive fishing practices if new and contrary information emerges. Conservation efforts for corals, in the absence of explicit ties to managed fish species, might do better emphasizing the intrinsic value of corals, their slow growth, high sensitivity to disturbance, and the questionable potential for recovery.


Frequency-dependant models species-individual relationships video functionally equivalent habitat 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews AH, Cordes EE, Mahoney MM, Munk K, Coale KH, Cailliet GM, Heifetz J (2002) Age, growth and radiometric age validation of a deep-sea, habitat forming gorgonian (Primnoa resedaeformis) from the Gulf of Alaska. Hydrobiologia 471: 101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auster PJ (2001) Defining thresholds for precautionary habitat management actions in a fisheries context. North Amer J Fish Managem 21: 1–9Google Scholar
  3. Auster PJ, Malatesta RJ, LaRosa SC (1995) Patterns of microhabitat utilization by mobile megafauna on the southern New England (USA) continental shelf and slope. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 127: 77–85Google Scholar
  4. Auster PJ, Malatesta RJ, Donaldson CLS (1997) Distributional responses to small-scale habitat variability by early juvenile silver hake, Merluccius bilinearis. Environ Biol Fish 50: 195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auster PJ, Michalopoulos C, Valentine PC, Malatesta RJ (1998) Delineating and monitoring habitat management units in a temperate deep-water marine protected area. In: Munro NWP, Willison JHM (eds) Linking Protected Areas with Working Landscapes, Conserving Biodiversity. Sci Managem Protected Areas Assoc, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, pp 169–185Google Scholar
  6. Auster PJ, Lindholm J, Valentine PC (2003) Variation in habitat use by juvenile Acadian redfish, Sebastes fasciatus. Environ Biol Fish 68: 381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breeze H, Davis DS, Butler M, Kostylev V (1997) Distribution and status of deep-sea corals off Nova Scotia. Marine Issue Comm Spec Publ l, Ecology Action Center, Halifax, NS, Canada, 58 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  9. De Forges BR, Koslow JA, Poore GCP (2000) Diversity and endemism of the benthic seamount fauna in the southwest Pacific. Nature 405: 944–947Google Scholar
  10. Fosså JH, Mortensen PB, Furevik DM (2000) Lophelia korallrev langs norskekysten forekomst og tilstand. Prosjektrapp Havforskningsinst, Bergen, 94 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Fosså JH, Mortensen PB, Furevik DM (2002) The deep-water coral Lophelia pertusa in Norwegian waters: distribution and fishery impacts. Hydrobiologia 471: 1–12Google Scholar
  12. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoret 19: 16–36Google Scholar
  13. Gilmore RG, Jones RS (1992) Color variation and associated behavior in the epihepheline groupers, Mycteroperca microlepis (Goode and Bean) and M. phenax Jordan Swain. Bull Mar Sci 51: 83–103Google Scholar
  14. Heifetz J (2002) Coral in Alaska: distribution, abundance, and species associations. Hydrobiologia 471: 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Husebø A, Nøttestad L, Fosså JH, Furevik DM, Jørgensen SB (2002) Distribution and abundance of fish in deep-sea coral habitats. Hydrobiologia 471: 91–99Google Scholar
  16. Koenig CC, Coleman FC, Grimes CB, Fizhugh GR, Scanlon KM, Gledhill CT, Grace M (2000) Protection of fish spawning habitat for the conservation of warm-temperate reef fish fisheries of shelf-edge reefs of Florida. Bull Mar Sci 66: 593–616Google Scholar
  17. Koenig CC, Shepard AN, Reed JK, Coleman FC, Brooke SD, Brusher J, Scanlon KM (in press) Habitat and fish populations in the deep-sea Oculina coral ecosystem of the western Atlantic. Amer Fish Soc Symp SerGoogle Scholar
  18. Koslow JA, Gowlett-Holmes K, Lowry JK, O’Hara T, Poore GCB, Williams A (2001) Seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 213: 111–125Google Scholar
  19. Kramer DL, Rangeley RW, Chapman LJ (1997) Habitat selection: patterns of spatial distribution from behavioural decisions. In: Godin J (ed) Behavioural Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Oxford Univ Press, New York, pp 37–80Google Scholar
  20. Krieger KJ (2001) Coral (Primnoa) impacted by fishing gear in the Gulf of Alaska. In: Willison JHM, Hall J, Gass SE, Kenchington ELR, Butler M, Doherty P (eds) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Deep-Sea Corals. Ecology Action Centre, Halifax, pp 106–116Google Scholar
  21. Krieger KJ, Wing BL (2002) Megafauna associations with deepwater corals (Primnoa spp.) in the Gulf of Alaska. Hydrobiologia 471: 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lazier A, Smith JE, Risk MJ, Schwarcz HP (1999) The skeletal structure of Desmophyllum cristagalli: the use of deep-water corals in sclerochronology. Lethaia 32: 119–130Google Scholar
  23. Lindholm JB, Auster PJ, Ruth M, Kaufman L (2001) Juvenile fish responses to variations in seafloor habitats: modeling the effects of fishing and implications for the design of marine protected areas. Conserv Biol 15: 424–437Google Scholar
  24. MacCall AD (1990) Dynamic Geography of Marine Fish Populations. Univ Washington Press, Seattle, 153 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Reed JK (2002) Comparison of deep-water coral reefs and lithotherms off southeastern USA. Hydrobiologia 471: 57–69Google Scholar
  26. Risk MJ, Heikoop JM, Snow MG, Beukens R (2002) Lifespans and growth patterns of two deep-sea corals: Primnoa resedaeformis and Desmophyllum cristagalli. Hydrobiologia 471: 125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sale PF (2002) Coral Reef Fishes, Dynamics and Diversity in a Complex Ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, California, 549 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Watling L, Auster PJ, Babb I, Skinder C, Hecker B (2003) A geographic database of deepwater Alcyonaceans of the Northeastern U.S. Continental Shelf and Slope. Version 1.0 CD-ROM. Natl Undersea Res Cent, Univ Connecticut, GrotonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Auster
    • 1
  1. 1.National Undersea Research Center, Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of ConnecticutGrotonUSA

Personalised recommendations