Advertisement

Computer-Assisted Surgery and Rotational Alignment of Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • G.M. Sikorski

Summary

Producing correct rotational alignment is important in total knee replacement. When bony landmarks are used, the transepicondylar axis (TEA) is the reference axis of choice for the femur. Referencing using soft-tissue balance or kinematics is today still speculative. The tibial component rotatory alignment should follow the achieved position of the femoral component. Good rotational alignment of both the tibial and femoral component is difficult to achieve with or without computer assistance.

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component Total Knee Replacement Tibial Component Anterior Knee Pain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrack RL et al (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:46–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger RA et al (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 356:144–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nagamine R et al (1995) Effect of rotation malposition of the femoral component on knee stability kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:265–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anouchi YS et al (1993) The effects of axial rotation alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop 287:170–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pagnano MW et al (2001) Varus tibial joint line obliquity: a potential cause of femoral component malrotation. Clin Orthop 393:68–74Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arima J et al (1995) Femoral rotational alignment, based on the antero-posterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:1331–1334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Churchill DL et al (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 356:111–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jerosch J et al (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in peri-operative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:194–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller MC et al (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:38–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olcott CW et al (2000) A comparison of four intra-operative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthropasty 15:22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Romero J et al (2003) Significance of axial rotation alignment of components of knee prostheses. Orthopade 32:461–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katz MA et al (2001) Determining femoral rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty: reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 16:301–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uehara K et al (2002) Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 402:196–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jazrawi LM et al (2000) The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation. J Arthroplasty 15:761–766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott W, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (The Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 86:818–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G.M. Sikorski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations