Advertisement

The Technique of PCL Retention in Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • T. J. Williams
  • T. S. Thornhill

Summary

The posterior cruciate ligament is the strongest ligament about the knee and a significant contributor to the flexion space and flexion balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors feel that the posterior cruciate ligament should be retained and balanced during primary knee arthroplasty and, when applicable, in revision total knee arthroplasty. It is essential, however, to balance the posterior cruciate ligament and use a tibial femoral geometry that is compatible with PCL retention. The technique for PCL balancing is straightforward, but the tests to determine proper PCL balance are different in fixed-bearing vs mobile total knee arthroplasties. This chapter reviews the anatomy of the PCL, its importance in balancing the flexion space, and the techniques for assuring proper PCL balance in fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties.

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty Posterior Cruciate Ligament Medial Collateral Ligament Lateral Collateral Ligament Cruciate Retainer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Dommelen BA, Fowler PJ (1989) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:24–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harner CD, et al (1995) The human posterior cruciate ligament complex: an interdisciplinary study: ligament morphology and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 23:736–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rand JA (1996) Posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. In: Morrey BF (ed) Reconstructive surgery of the joints, vol 2, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1401–1408Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes CL, Sledge CB (1993) Total knee arthroplasty with posterior cruciate ligament retention designs. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti P (eds) Surgery of the knee, vol 2, 2nd edn. Churchill Living-stone, New York, pp 815–827Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott RD, Thornhill TS (1994) Posterior cruciate supplementing total knee replacement using conforming inserts an cruciate recession: Effect on range of motion and radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop 309:64–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM (1996) In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop 331:107–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al (1995) Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 77:884–889Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirsch HS, Lotke PA, Morrison LD (1994) The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery: save, sacrifice, or substitute? Clin Orthop 309:64–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM (1988) Posterior cruciate ligament balancing during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:323–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Callaghan JJ, O’Rourke MR, et al (2002) Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 04:83–88Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Puloski S, McCalden RW et al (2001) Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: an unrecognized source of polyethylene debris. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 83:390–397PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Williams
  • T. S. Thornhill

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations