Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Urinary and Fecal Incontinence pp 103–118Cite as

Fecal Incontinence After Rectal and Perianal Surgery

  • Chapter

  • 919 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker JM, LaMorte W, St Marie G et al (1997) Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 40:653–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum EH, Stamm L, Rafferty JF et al (1996) Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1215–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatwin NA, Ribordy M, Givel JC (2002) Clinical outcomes and quality of life after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg 168:297–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C et al (1994) Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81:302–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio VW, O’Riordain MG, Lavery IC et al (1999) Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 230:575–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M et al (1995) Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:249–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD et al (1996) Open vs. closed sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 39:440–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervaz P, Rotholtz N, Wexner SD et al (2001) Colonic J-pouch function in rectal cancer patients: impact of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1667–1675

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graf W, Pahlman L, Ejerblad S (1995) Functional results after seton treatment of high transsphincteric anal fistulas. Eur J Surg 161:289–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamalainen KP, Sainio AP (1997) Cutting seton for anal fistulas: high risk of minor control defects. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1443–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa H, Radley S, Keighley MR (2000) Long-term results of cutting seton fistulotomy. Acta Chir Iugosl 47[Suppl 1]:19–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayne D, Vaizey CJ, Boulos PB (2001) Anorectal injury following pelvic radiotherapy. Br J Surg 88:1037–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herman RM, Richter P, Walega P et al (2001) Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:370–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YH, Brown S, Heah SM et al (2002) Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg 236:49–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C et al (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy — cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 25:876–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho P, Law WL, Chan SC et al (2003) Functional outcome following low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in the elderly. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:230–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR (1995) Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy-and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 19:138–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johannsson HO, Graf W, Pahlman L (2002) Long-term results of haemorrhoidectomy. Eur J Surg 168:485–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, King DW (2002) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision: is anorectal function compromised? Dis Colon Rectum 45:601–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Pawlak SE, Eggenberger JC et al (2001) Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized trial comparing closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the Harmonic Scalpel technique of excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 44:845–849

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khubchandani IT, Reed JF (1989) Sequelae of internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure in ano. Br J Surg 76:431–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kling KM, Rongione AJ, Evans B et al (1996) The Delorme procedure: a useful operation for complicated rectal prolapse in the elderly. Am Surg 62:857–860

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konsten J, Baeten CG (2000) Hemorrhoidectomy vs. Lord’s method: 17-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 43:503–506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Haug V et al (1996) Functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1116–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lechaux JP, Lechaux D, Perez M (1995) Results of Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of a modified technique. Dis Colon Rectum 38:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis TH, Corman ML, Prager ED et al (1988) Long-term results of open and closed sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 31:368–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson ME et al (1995) Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 38:259–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Gunther K et al (2003) Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome. Colorectal Dis 5:458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell JC, Khubchandani IT (1983) Long-term follow-up of closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 26:797–799

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GV, Finan PJ (1998) Flap advancement and core fistulectomy for complex rectal fistula. Br J Surg 85:108–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz H, Marzo J (2000) Endorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas. Br JSurg 87:1680–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl RK, Andrews JR, Orsay CP et al (1993) Role of the seton in the management of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 36:573–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pernikoff BJ, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ et al (1994) Reappraisal of partial lateral internal sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1291–1295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rao GN, Drew PJ, Lee PW et al (1996) Anterior resection syndrome is secondary to sympathetic denervation. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:250–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen OO, Petersen IK, Christiansen J (2003) Anorectal function following low anterior resection. J Colorectal Dis 5:258–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten WR, Zimmerman DD, Briel JW (1999) Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1419–1422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sentovich SM (2003) Fibrin gluefor anal fistulas: longterm results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:498–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatiadis A, Konstantinou E, Theodosopoulou E et al (2002) Frequency of operative trauma to anal sphincters: evaluation with endoanal ultrasound. Gastroenterol Nurs 25:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theerapol A, So BY, Ngoi SS (2002) Routine use of setons for the treatment of anal fistulae. Singapore Med J 43:305–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin SA, Scott IH (1994) Delorme operation for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81:1681–1684

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N et al (2003) Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1260–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam JH, Huisman WM, Hop WC et al (2000) Fecal continence after rectocele repair: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:54–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC (1994) Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1194–1197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH (1995) Seton treatment of perianal fistula with high anal or rectal opening. Br J Surg 82:895–897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Tran K et al (1997) Influence of Parks’ anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1042–1045

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH (1985) Results of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 28:225–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh FK, McFall M, Mitchell G et al (2003) Pre-operative short-course radiotherapy is associated with faecal incontinence after anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 5:563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H et al (1993) Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg 159:301–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman DD, Gosselink MP, Hop WC et al (2003) Impact of two different types of anal retractor on fecal continence after fistula repair: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1674–1679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Alan G. Thorson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Zentrum für Medizinische Forschung, Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine, Waldhörnlestrasse 22, 72072, Tübingen, Germany

    Horst-Dieter Becker

  2. Universitätsklinik für Urologie, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Arnulf Stenzl

  3. Universitätsfrauenklinik, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Diethelm Wallwiener

  4. Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine, Hoppe-Seyler Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Tilman T. Zittel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thorson, A.G. (2005). Fecal Incontinence After Rectal and Perianal Surgery. In: Becker, HD., Stenzl, A., Wallwiener, D., Zittel, T.T. (eds) Urinary and Fecal Incontinence. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27494-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27494-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22225-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27494-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation