Advertisement

The Collapse of the Hanshin Expressway (Fukae) Bridge, Kobe 1995: Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction, Reconstruction, Seismic Isolation

Conference paper

Abstract

The collapse of 18 spans (total length 630 m) of the Hanshin Expressway Route 3 elevated highway bridge in Fukae during the 1995 Kobe earthquake is investigated. The overturned concrete deck was monolithically connected (“piltz” form) to 3.1-m-diameter circular-column piers, founded on 17-pile groups in alluvium sand and gravel. The collapse has been attributed by many research engineers to inadequate structural design, stemming from insufficient and prematurely-terminated longitudinal reinforcement, inadequate hoop anchorage, and (for the large intensity of shaking) insufficient shear capacity. The importance of other factors has been largely ignored. This study presents evidence in the form of a parametric study of the inelastic response of the bridge-foundation-soil system, showing that the role of Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction (SFSI) was significant and decisively detrimental.

The extreme distress of the structure also severely affected the piles, which were found to have suffered flexural cracking near their top; lateral pile load tests confirmed the decline of their structural stiffness and strength by about 50%. But the stiffness of the pile-soil system apparently only marginally decreased and, thanks to the elaborate seismic isolation bearings introduced in the new design, no changes to foundations were deemed necessary. We show that even a much simpler friction-based seismic isolation system would have saved the original bridge with rather minor acceptable damage.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Committee of Earthquake Engineering, The 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake-Investigation into damage to civil engineer structures, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Japanese Geotechnical Society: Geotechnical aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. Soils and Foundations, Special Issue, Jan. 1996.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Earthquake Engineering Research Institute: “The Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake, January 17, 1995”. Preliminary EERI Reconnaissance Report, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Seible, F., Priestley, M.J.N. and MacRae, G.: “The Kobe earthquake of January 17, 1995; initial impressions from a quick reconnaissance”. Structural Systems Research Report-95/03, University of California, San Diego, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Gazetas G.: Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering: Case Histories. Symeon Publishing Co, 1996, (in Greek).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Park, R.: “An Analysis of the failure of the 630 m elevated expressway in Great Hanshin Earthquake”. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 29, 2, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Iwasaki T., chm, et al: “Report on Highway bridge damage caused by the Hyogo ken Nanbu Earthquake of 1995”. Report by the Committee on Highway Bridge Damage, Japan, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kawashima K. & Unjoh S.: “Impact of Hanshin/Awaji earthquake on seismic design and seismic strengthening of Highway bridges”. The 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake, Committee of Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, pp. 135–163, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kawashima K. & Unjoh S.: “The Damage of Highway Bridges in the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake and its impact on Japanese Seismic Design”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, No 3, pp. 505–541, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Anastasopoulos, I.: “Analysis of the failure of two bridges in the 1995 Kobe earthquake, and the role of soil”. Diploma Thesis, National Technical University, Athens, Greece, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Sun, L., Goto, Y., Hayashi, H. and Kosa, K.: “Damage mechanism analysis of RC bridge by nonlinear dynamic simulations”. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 0488 New Zealand, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Abe, S., Fujino, Y. and Abe, M.: “An Analysis of damage to Hanshin Elevated Expressway during 1995 Kobe earthquake”. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper 0318, New Zealand 2000.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Adachi, Y., Ishizaki, H., Ikehata, S., Ikeda, S.: Verification of the Failure of Reinforced Concrete Piers under the Near-field Earthquake. Hanshin Expressway Public Corporation Publications, Japan, 2003.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Bielak, J.: “Dynamic response of non-linear building-foundation systems”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp 17–30, Jan.–Feb. 1978.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Resendiz, D. and Roesset, J.M.: “Soil-structure interaction in Mexico City during the 1985 earthquake”. The Mexico Earthquakes of 1985, ASCE Special Publication, M. A. Cassaro & E. M. Romero (eds.), pp. 193–203, 1987.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Meymand, P.J.: “Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Takewaki, I.: “Remarkable response amplification of building frames due to resonance with the surface ground”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 17, pp. 211–218, 1998Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mylonakis, G. and Gazetas, G.: “Seismic soil-Structure Interaction: Beneficial or Detrimental? ”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol 4, No 3, pp. 277–301, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Syngros, C.: “Seismic response of piles and pile-supported bridge piers evaluated through case histories”. Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Gazetas, G.: Foundation vibrations. Foundation Engineering Handbook H.Y. Fang, ed., Van Nostrand Reinholds, 553–593, 1991.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Mylonakis, G., Nikolaou, A., and Gazetas, G.: “Soil-pile-bridge seismic interaction: kinematic and inertial effects. Part I: Soft soil ”. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, pp. 337–359, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Poulos, H.G. & Davis, E.H.: Pile foundation analysis and design. Jonh Wiley & Sons, 1980.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Michaelides, O. and Gazetas G.: “Non-linear analysis of piles”. Research Report of Soil Mechanics Laboratory, National Technical University of Athens, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Gazetas, G. and Dobry, R.: “ Horizontal response of piles in layered soils”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.110, No. 1, pp. 20–21, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Somerville P.: “Seismic Hazard Evaluation State-of-the-Art Paper”. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Vol. 3, pp. 325–346, 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthen
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of PatrasPatras

Personalised recommendations