Advertisement

The use of local agents: surgicel and surgifoam

  • Michael Sabel
  • Walter Stummer

Abstract

There are various electrical, mechanical and chemical methods used to achieve haemostasis in spine surgery. Chemical haemostatic agents are often preferable to bipolar cautery in intraspinal procedures, because these products control bleeding without occluding the vessel lumen and cause no thermal injuries to adjacent structures. A topical haemostat is the often the technique of choice to control bleeding from bone and to diffuse capillary and epidural venous oozing. This paper focuses on technical aspects of the application of absorbable porcine gelatine and regenerated, oxidised cellulose. These haemostats have been used in neurosurgical intraspinal procedures for more than 30 years; however, new application forms like Surgicel fibrillar and Surgifoam powder imply different handling options, which are discussed in this paper.

Keywords

Haemostats Spine Absorbable porcine gelatine Regenerated oxidised cellulose Intraspinal surgery 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alander DH, Stauffer ES (1995) Gelfoam-induced acute quadriparesis after cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 20:970–971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arand AG, Sawaya R (1986) Intraoperative chemical hemostasis in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 18:223–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banerjee T, Goldschmidt K (1998) “Surgiceloma” manifested as cauda equina syndrome. South Med J 91: 481–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellen P (1992) [Prevention of peridural fibrosis following laminectomy. Apropos of a case of monoradicular paralysis due to an intracanalar hematoma on Gelfoam]. Acta Orthop Belg 58:236–239Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brodbelt AR, Miles JB, Foy PM, Broome JC (2002) Intraspinal oxidised cellulose (Surgicel) causing delayed paraplegia after thoracotomy — a report of three cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:97–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman J, Whitecloud TS 3rd (2001) Lumbar cauda equina syndrome associated with the use of gelfoam: case report. Spine 26:E485–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibrahim MF, Aps C, Young CP (2002) A foreign body reaction to Surgicel mimicking an abscess following cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22:489–490; author reply 490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oto A, Remer EM, O’Malley CM, Tkach JA, Gill IS (1999) MR characteristics of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel). AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1481–1484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sandhu GS, Elexpuru-Camiruaga JA, Buckley S (1996) Oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) granulomata mimicking tumour recurrence. Br J Neurosurg 10: 617–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Turley BR, Taupmann RE, Johnson PL (1994) Postoperative abscess mimicked by Surgicel. Abdom Imaging 19:345–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Young ST, Paulson EK, McCann RL, Baker ME (1993) Appearance of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) on postoperative CT scans: similarity to postoperative abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:275–277PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Sabel
    • 1
  • Walter Stummer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryHeinrich Heine University of DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations