Introduction and Overview

Part of the Studies in Choice and Welfare book series (WELFARE)


Social Choice American Political Science Review Bargaining Model Electoral Competition Pure Strategy Equilibrium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Aragones E. and Palfrey T. (2002) Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate. Journal of Economic Theory, 103: 131–161.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Austen-Smith, D. (1987) Sophisticated sincerity: voting over endogenous agendas. American Political Science Review, 81: 1323–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Austen-Smith, D. and J. S. Banks (1989) Electoral accountability and incumbency, in Models of Strategic Choice in Politics, Ordeshook, P. (ed) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Austen-Smith, D. and J. S. Banks (1996) Information aggregation, rationality and the Condorcet jury theorem. American Political Science Review, 90: 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Banks, J. S. (1985) Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control. Social Choice and Welfare, 1: 295–306.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Banks, J. S. (1989a) Equilibrium outcomes in two-stage amendment procedures. American Journal of Political Science, 33: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Banks, J. S. (1989b) Agency budgets, cost information, and auditing. American Journal of Political Science, 33: 670–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Banks, J. S. (1990) A model of electoral competition with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Theory, 50: 309–325.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Banks, J. S. (1990b) Monopoly agenda control and asymmetric information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105: 445–464.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Banks, J. S. (1990c) Equilibrium behavior in crisis bargaining games. American Journal of Political Science, 34: 599–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Banks, J. S. (1993) Two-sided uncertainty in the monopoly agenda setter model. Journal of Public Economics, 50: 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Banks, J. S. (1995a) Acyclic social choice from finite sets. Social Choice and Welfare 1995, 12: 293–310zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Banks, J. S. (1995b) Singularity theory and core existence in the spatial model. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 24: 523–536.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Banks, J. S. (1999) Committee proposals and restrictive rules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96: 8295–8300.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Banks, J. S. and J. Duggan (2000) A bargaining model of collective choice. American Political Science Review, 94: 733–788.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Banks, J. S. and J. Duggan (2002) A multidimensional model of repeated elections. Mimeo. University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Banks, J. S. and J. Duggan (2002) A bargaining model of legislative policy-making. Mimeo. University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Banks, J. S., J. Duggan, and M. Le Breton (2002a) Bounds on mixed strategy equilibria and the spatial model of elections. Journal of Economic Theory 103: 88–105.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Banks, J. S., J. Duggan, and M. Le Breton (2004) Social choice and electoral competition in the general spatial model. Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Banks, J. S. and F. Gasmi (1987) Endogenous agenda formation in three person committees. Social Choice and Welfare, 54: 133–152.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Banks, J.S., C. Plott and D. Porter (1988) An experimental analysis of unanimity in public goods provision mechanisms. Review of Economic Studies, 55: 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Banks, J. S. and J. Sobel (1987) Equilibrium selection in signaling games. Econometrica, 55: 647–661.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Banks, J. S. and R. Sundaram (1992a) A class of bandit problems yielding myopic optimal strategies. Journal of Applied Probability, 29: 625–632.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Banks, J. S. and R. Sundaram (1992b) Denumerable-armed bandits. Econometrica, 60: 1071–1096.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Banks, J. S. and R. Sundaram (1993) Adverse selection and moral hazard in a repeated elections model. In Political Economy: Institutions, Information, Competition, and Representation, Barnett, W., M. Hinich and N. Schofield (eds) New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Banks, J. S. and R. Sundaram (1994) Switching costs and the Gittens index. Econometrica, 62: 687–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Banks, J. S. and R. Sundaram (1998) Optimal retention in agency problems. Journal of Economic Theory 82: 293–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Baron, D. P. (1989) A noncooperative theory of legislative coalitions. American Journal of Political Science, 33: 57–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Baron, D. P. (1991a) Majoritarian incentives, pork barrel programs, and procedural control. American Journal of Political Science, 34: 57–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Baron, D. P. (1991b) A spatial bargaining theory of government formation in parliamentary systems. American Political Science Review, 85: 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Baron, D. P. and J. A. Ferejohn (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. American Political Science Review, 83: 1181–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Barro, R. (1973) The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model, Public Choice 14: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Black, D. (1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Black, D. and R.A. Newing (1951) Committee Decisions with Complementary Valuations. London: William Hodge.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Borel, E. (1953) The theory of play and integral equations with skew symmetric kernels. Econometrica 21: 97–100.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Calvert, R. (1986) Models of Imperfect Information in Politics. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Coughlan, P. (2001) In defense of unanimous jury verdicts: mistrials, communication and strategic voting. American Political Science Review 94: 375–93.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Coughlin, P. (1992) Probabilistic Voting Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Coughlin, P. and S. Nitzan (1981) Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and Nash social welfare maxima. Journal of Public Economics, 15: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Cox, G. W. and M. D. McCubbins (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Duggan, J. (2000) Repeated elections with asymmetric information. Economics and Politics 12: 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Duggan, J. (2003) Endogenous voting agendas. Social Choice and Welfare, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Eraslan, H. (2002) Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in the Baron-Ferejohn model. Journal of Economic Theory, 103: 11–30.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Farqhuarson, R. (1969) Theory of Voting. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Ferejohn J.A. (1986) Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Gilligan, T. and K. Krehbiel (1987) Collective decision-making and standing committees: an informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3: 287–335.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Gittins, J. (1989) Allocation Indices for Multi-Armed Bandits. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Gittins, J. and D. Jones (1974) A dynamic allocation index for the sequential allocation of experiments. In J. Gani et al. (eds) Progress in Statistics Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Gross, O. and R. Wagner (1951) A continuous Colonel Blotto game. Working Paper, RAND RM-408.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Hinich, M. (1977) Equilibrium in spatial voting: the median voter result is an artifact. Journal of Economic Theory, 16: 208–219.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Hinich, M., J. Ledyard, and P. Ordeshook (1972) Nonvoting and the existence of equilibrium under majority rule. Journal of Economic Theory, 4: 144–153.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Hinich, M., J. Ledyard, and P. Ordeshook (1973) A theory of electoral equilibrium: a spatial analysis based on the theory of games. Journal of Politics, 35: 154–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Hotelling, H. (1929) Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Kalandrakis, T. (2004) A three player dynamic majoritarian bargaining game. Journal of Economic Theory, 116: 294–322.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Kramer, G. (1972) Sophisticated voting over multidimensional choice spaces. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2: 165–180.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    Kramer, G. (1978) Existence of electoral equilibrium, in P. Ordeshook (ed) Game Theory and Political Science, NYU Press: New York.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Krehbiel, K. (1998) Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Ladha, K. (1992) The Condorcet jury theorem, free speech and correlated votes. American Journal of Political Science, 36: 617–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Laslier, J.-F. (1997) Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Laslier, J.-F. and N. Picard (2002) Distributive politics and electoral competition. Journal of Economic Theory, 103: 106–130.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Ledyard, J. (1984) The pure theory of large two-candidate elections. Public Choice, 44: 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    Mas-Colell, A. and H. Sonnenschein. (1972) General possibility theorems for group decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 39: 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    McKelvey, R. D. (1986) Covering, dominance and institution-free properties of social choice. American Journal of Political Science, 30: 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    McKelvey, R. D. and R.G. Niemi (1978) A multistage game representa-tion of sophisticated voting for binary procedures. Journal of Economic Theory, 18: 1–22.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    McLennan, A. (1998) Consequences of the Condorcet jury theorem for beneficial information aggregation by rational players. American Political Science Review, 92: 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    Merlo, A. (1997) Bargaining over governments in a stochastic environment. Journal of Political Economy, 105: 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    Miller, N. R. (1977) Graph-theoretical approaches to the theory of voting. American Journal of Political Science, 21: 769–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    Miller, N. R. (1980) A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting. American Journal of Political Science, 24: 68–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    Miller, N. R. (1986) Information, electorates and democracy: some extensions and interpretations of the Condorcet jury theorem. In Grofman, B. and G. Owen (eds) Information Pooling and Group Decision-Making. Greenwich, Con.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  71. [71]
    Miller, N. R. (1995) Committees, Agendas and Voting. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Miller, N. R., B. Grofman and S. Feld (1990) The structure of the Banks set. Public Choice, 66: 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. [73]
    Morelli, M. (1999) Demand competition and policy compromise in legislative bargaining. American Political Science Review, 93: 809–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. [74]
    Nakamura, K. (1979) The vetoers in a simple game with ordinal preferences. International Journal of Game Theory, 8: 55–61.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    Nitzan, S. and J. Paroush (1985) Collective Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. [76]
    Palfrey, T. and H. Rosenthal (1985) Voter participation and strategic uncertainty. American Political Science Review, 79: 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. [77]
    Penn, E. (2003) A distributive N-amendment game with endogenous agenda-setting. Mimeo. Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    Plott, C. (1967) A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review 57: 787–806.Google Scholar
  79. [79]
    Riker, W.H. (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  80. [80]
    Rohde, D. W. (1991) Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  81. [81]
    Rubinstein, A. (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50: 97–109.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. [82]
    Saari, D. (1997) The generic existence of a core for q-rules, Economic Theory, 9: 219–260.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    Schofield, N. (1980) Generic properties of simple Bergson-Samuelson welfare functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 7: 175–192.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    Schofield, N. (1983) Generic instability of majority rule. Review of Economic Studies, 50: 695–705.zbMATHMathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    Schwartz, T. (2001) From Arrow to cycles, instability, and chaos by untying alternatives. Social Choice and Welfare, 18: 1–22.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    Shepsle, K. A. (1979) Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Political Science, 23: 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    Winter, E. (1996) Voting and vetoing. American Political Science Review, 90: 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityUSA
  2. 2.University of RochesterRochester

Personalised recommendations