Abstract
During the long economic upswing of the 1980s and 1990s, the successful commercialization of new technology went together with the appearance of new financial vehicles, new organizational forms, and new practices promoting and mediating the transfer of the new technology from lab to market. They included business incubators, technology parks, venture capitalist firms, operators specializing in mergers and acquisitions, venture funds, and initial public offerings in the stock market. Commercialization-facilitating organizations and practices like these (here called “commercialization facilitators”) are themselves born by dynamic processes in a capitalist economy that can be analyzed in Schumpeterian terms. We discuss at some length a unique university-based institution that has an impressive track record of creating and operating new facilitating models: the IC2 Institute (Innovation, Creativity and Capital) of the University of Texas. During a twenty-five year period, IC2 came to be instrumental in the conversion of the local economy to the high tech age. The Institute’s activities span the range of the technology transfer and commercialization process, from the development and dissemination of new knowledge to the actual running of business incubators. We identify the IC2 Institute as a “second order” facilitator and discuss its possible global evolution into a “third order” facilitator.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1990) Innovation and small firms. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Audretsch DB, Thurik AR (2000) Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10: 17–34
Baldwin JR, Johnson J (1999) Entry, innovation and firm growth. In: Acs ZJ (ed.) Are small firms important? Their role and impact, Kluwer, Dordrecht
Brouwer MT (2002) Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on entrepreneurship and economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12: 83–105
Casson M (1995) Enterprise and competitiveness. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gilder G (1993) America’s best infrastructure program. The Wall Street Journal, March 2
Harvard Business School (1998) Austin, Texas: building a high-tech economy. Case 9-799-038, October
Hicks DA (1991) New dimensions of Dallas area economic development. The Survey of Regional Literature, 19, September: 11–24
Lundvall BA, Borrás S (1997) The globalising learning economy: implications for innovation policy. DG XII, Commission of the European Union
Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. 8th ed. 1946. Macmillan, London
MIT Media Laboratory (1999) Enabling technologies for learning and expression by people and machines. MIT, Cambridge, Mass. (March)
Nelson J (2002) Bringing institutions into evolutionary growth theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12: 17–28
Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1977) Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems: from dissipative structures to order through fluctuations. Wiley, New York
Norton JA, Bass FM (1992) Evolution of technological generations: the law of capture. Sloan Management Review, 33,2: 66–77
Porter AW (2001) The knowledge seekers: how to turn your community into an engine for economic success. IC2 Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas
Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos, Man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books, Toronto
Ramamoorthy CV (2000) A study of the service industry-functions, features and control. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E83-B(5): 885–902
Rogers RS (1998) Prickly research partnerships. C&EN (Sept. 21), 21–25
Ronstadt R, Furino A (2001) Creating IC2-like organizations: networking innovative organizations world-wide to design and launch new technologies, create jobs, and induce economic development. IC2 Institute, The University of Texas, Austin (working paper, October)
Ronstadt R, Furino A, Thore S (2002) Regional development strategies: creating a global network of commercialization accelerators. IC2 Institute, The University of Texas, Austin (working paper, August)
Ronstadt R, Paulin W (1996) Entrepreneurship facilitation for high technology businesses: forging a new theory. Pepperdine University, Malibu, Calif. (August)
Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle, German original 1911, first English ed. 1934, 2nd ed. 1978. Oxford University Press, London and New York
Schumpeter J (1950) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. 1st ed. Harper and Brothers 1942, third edition, Harper Torchbooks 1950, New York
Smilor RW, Gibson DV, Kozmetsky G (1988) Creating the technopolis: high-technology development in Austin, Texas. Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 49–67
Tanik J (1999) University-based technology transfer: a state-of-the-art process based on evolutionary success. The IC2 Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Texas
Thore S (1995) The diversity, complexity, and evolution of high tech capitalism, Also published on the Internet, see http://www.ic2.org/pubs/sten.pdf. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Thore S (2002) Technology commercialization: DEA and related analytical methods for evaluating the use and implementation of technical innovation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Wiggins J, Gibson DV (2003) Overview of US incubators and the case of the Austin Technology Incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3,1/2: 56–66
Wolfram S (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media
Wynarczyk P, Wynarczyk P (2002) Turning Schumpeterian theoretical insights into public policy action: fostering entrepreneurship and innovation through European Business and Innovation Centres (EuBICs) in less favoured regions of Europe. Paper presented at the 9th International Schumpeter Society Conference in Gainesville, Florida, March 2002
Yorke J, Li TY (1975) Period three implies chaos. American Mathematical Monthly, 82: 985–992
Zacks R (2000) University research scorecard. The Technology Review, 2000, July/August: 88–90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thore, S., Ronstadt, R. (2005). The growth of commercialization — facilitating organizations and practices: A Schumpeterian perspective. In: Cantner, U., Dinopoulos, E., Lanzillotti, R.F. (eds) Entrepreneurships, the New Economy and Public Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26994-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26994-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22613-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26994-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)
